CPE Details
Alerte pour un CPE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CPE spécifique.
CPE Name: cpe:2.3:a:mitel:micollab:7.3:*:*:*:*:-:*:*
Informations
Vendor
mitelProduct
micollabVersion
7.3Target Software
-Related CVE
| CVE ID | Publié | Description | Score | Gravité |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP2 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privilege to conduct a local file read, due to insufficient input sanitization. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated admin attacker to access resources that are constrained to the admin access level, and the disclosure is limited to non-sensitive system information. This vulnerability does not allow file modification or privilege escalation. | 4.4 |
Moyen |
||
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts. | 4.8 |
Moyen |
||
| A vulnerability in the Suite Applications Services component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts. | 4.8 |
Moyen |
||
| A vulnerability in the Suite Applications Services component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations. | 7.2 |
Haute |
||
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations. | 7.2 |
Haute |
||
| A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a path traversal attack, due to insufficient input validation. A successful exploit could allow unauthorized access, enabling the attacker to view, corrupt, or delete users' data and system configurations. | 9.1 |
Critique |
||
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.2.9 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to download a shared file via a crafted request - including the exact path and filename - due to improper authentication control. A successful exploit could allow access to sensitive information. | 5.9 |
Moyen |
||
| The web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.0.13 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary scripts due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow remote code execution within the context of the application. | 9.8 |
Critique |
||
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client server component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack due to insufficient restriction of URL parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to leverage connections and permissions available to the host server. | 8.8 |
Haute |
||
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload malicious files. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application. | 9.8 |
Critique |
||
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to impersonate another user's name. | 6.5 |
Moyen |
||
| The TP-240 (aka tp240dvr) component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.4 SP1 FP1 and MiVoice Business Express through 8.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service (performance degradation and excessive outbound traffic). This was exploited in the wild in February and March 2022 for the TP240PhoneHome DDoS attack. | 9.8 |
Critique |
||
| The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack due to improper TLS negotiation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify data. | 4.8 |
Moyen |
||
| The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to get source code information (disclosing sensitive application data) due to insufficient output sanitization. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view source code methods. | 6.5 |
Moyen |
||
| The MiCollab Client service in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to gain system access due to improper access control. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify application data, and cause a denial of service for users. | 9.8 |
Critique |
||
| The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a clickjacking attack due to an insecure header response. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to modify the browser header and redirect users. | 5.4 |
Moyen |
||
| The AWV and MiCollab Client Service components in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack by sending multiple session renegotiation requests, due to insufficient TLS session controls. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to modify application data and state. | 3.7 |
Bas |
||
| The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to view sensitive system information through an HTTP response due to insufficient output sanitization. | 6.5 |
Moyen |
||
| The SAS Admin portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access (view and modify) user data by injecting arbitrary directory paths due to improper URL validation, aka Directory Traversal. | 6.5 |
Moyen |
||
| The Join Meeting page of Mitel MiCollab Web Client before 9.2 FP2 could allow an attacker to access (view and modify) user data by executing arbitrary code due to insufficient input validation, aka Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). | 6.1 |
Moyen |
||
| A library index page in NuPoint Messenger in Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP1 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain access (view and modify) to user data. | 9.1 |
Critique |
||
| The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to access user credentials due to improper input validation, aka SQL Injection. | 7.2 |
Haute |
||
| The NuPoint Messenger Portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to insufficient input validation, aka XSS. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify user data. | 5.4 |
Moyen |
||
| The online help portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to redirect a user to an unauthorized website by executing malicious script due to insufficient access control. | 6.1 |
Moyen |
||
| The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to view system information by sending arbitrary code due to improper input validation, aka XSS. | 6.1 |
Moyen |
||
| The AWV portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to gain access to conference information by sending arbitrary code due to improper input validation, aka XSS. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to view user conference information. | 6.1 |
Moyen |
||
| The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to gain access to a web conference due to insufficient access control for conference codes. | 5.3 |
Moyen |
||
| The NuPoint Messenger of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker with escalated privilege to access user files due to insufficient access control. Successful exploit could potentially allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information. | 4.9 |
Moyen |
||
| The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.1.3 could allow an attacker to access user data by performing a header injection in HTTP responses, due to the improper handling of input parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access user information. | 8.1 |
Haute |
||
| A vulnerability in the web conference chat component of MiCollab, versions 7.3 PR6 (7.3.0.601) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP2 (8.0.2.202), and MiVoice Business Express versions 7.3 PR3 (7.3.1.302) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP1 (8.0.2.202), could allow creation of unauthorized chat sessions, due to insufficient access controls. A successful exploit could allow execution of arbitrary commands. | 5.3 |
Moyen |
||
| MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier, 7.2 (7.2.2.13) and earlier, and 7.1 (7.1.0.57) and earlier and MiCollab AWV 6.3 (6.3.0.103), 6.2 (6.2.2.8), 6.1 (6.1.0.28), 6.0 (6.0.0.61), and 5.0 (5.0.5.7) have a Command Execution Vulnerability. Successful exploit of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary system commands. | 9.8 |
Critique |
||
| The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | 7.5 |
Haute |
Les informations affichées sur CVE Find proviennent de plusieurs sources de référence rigoureusement sélectionnées. Les données CVE sont fournies par MITRE Corporation et la National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Le catalogue des vulnérabilités activement exploitées (KEV) provient de la Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), tandis que les scores EPSS sont issus de FIRST.org. Enfin, les données relatives aux faiblesses logicielles (CWE) et aux schémas d'attaque courants (CAPEC)
sont maintenues par MITRE Corporation, et les informations sur les configurations
logicielles et matérielles (CPE) proviennent du NVD.