CVE-2008-5718 : Détail

CVE-2008-5718

OS Command Injection
A03-Injection
1.82%V4
Network
2008-12-26
16h08 +00:00
2009-01-22
09h00 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

The papd daemon in Netatalk before 2.0.4-beta2, when using certain variables in a pipe command for the print file, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a print request, as demonstrated using a crafted Title.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version To (including) 2.0.3

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.4.99-0.20000927

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.4.99-0.20001108

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5.1

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5.1.1

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5.2

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5.3.1

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5.5

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5pre3

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5pre4

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5pre5

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5pre6

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5pre7

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.5pre8

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.6.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.6.1

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.6.2

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.6.3

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.6.4

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 1.6.4a

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0.0

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0.1

Netatalk>>Netatalk >> Version 2.0.2

Références

http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1705
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://secunia.com/advisories/34484
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/33548
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/33227
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://osvdb.org/50824
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_OSVDB
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32925
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/13/3
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST