CVE-2016-1000345 : Détail

CVE-2016-1000345

5.9
/
Moyen
0.38%V3
Network
2018-06-04
19h00 +00:00
2020-10-20
19h14 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-361 Category : 7PK - Time and State
This category represents one of the phyla in the Seven Pernicious Kingdoms vulnerability classification. It includes weaknesses related to the improper management of time and state in an environment that supports simultaneous or near-simultaneous computation by multiple systems, processes, or threads. According to the authors of the Seven Pernicious Kingdoms, "Distributed computation is about time and state. That is, in order for more than one component to communicate, state must be shared, and all that takes time. Most programmers anthropomorphize their work. They think about one thread of control carrying out the entire program in the same way they would if they had to do the job themselves. Modern computers, however, switch between tasks very quickly, and in multi-core, multi-CPU, or distributed systems, two events may take place at exactly the same time. Defects rush to fill the gap between the programmer's model of how a program executes and what happens in reality. These defects are related to unexpected interactions between threads, processes, time, and information. These interactions happen through shared state: semaphores, variables, the file system, and, basically, anything that can store information."

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.0 5.9 MEDIUM CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

High

A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

[email protected]
V2 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version To (including) 1.55

  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.01 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.02 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.03 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.04 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.05 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.06 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.07 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.08 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.09 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.10 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.11 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.12 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.13 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.14 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.15 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.16 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.17 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.18 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.19 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.20 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.21 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.22 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.23 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.24 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.25 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.26 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.27 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.28 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.29 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.30 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.31 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.32 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.33 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.34 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.35 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.36 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.37 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.38 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.39 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.40 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.41 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.42 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.43 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.44 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.45 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.46 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.47 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.48 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.49 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.50 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.51 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.52 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.53 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.54 (Open CPE detail)
  • Bouncycastle>>Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api >> Version 1.55 (Open CPE detail)

Configuraton 0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 8.0

Références

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
https://usn.ubuntu.com/3727-1/
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT