Faiblesses connexes
CWE-ID |
Nom de la faiblesse |
Source |
CWE-20 |
Improper Input Validation The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. |
|
Metrics
Metric |
Score |
Sévérité |
CVSS Vecteur |
Source |
V3.0 |
9.8 |
CRITICAL |
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack VectorThis metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers). Attack ComplexityThis metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component. Privileges RequiredThis metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack. User InteractionThis metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsAn important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges. ScopeFormally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports. An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component. Confidentiality ImpactThis metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity ImpactThis metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component. Availability ImpactThis metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental Metrics
|
[email protected] |
V2 |
10 |
|
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
[email protected] |
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
EPSS Score
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
EPSS Percentile
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Informations sur l'Exploit
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 40599
Date de publication : 2016-10-19 22:00 +00:00
Auteur : Google Security Research
EDB Vérifié : Yes
Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=868
We have encountered Windows kernel crashes in the win32k!sbit_Embolden and win32k!ttfdCloseFontContext functions while processing corrupted TTF font files. Excerpts of them are shown below:
---
KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (8e)
This is a very common bugcheck. Usually the exception address pinpoints
the driver/function that caused the problem. Always note this address
as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.
Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003. This means a hard
coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted
/NODEBUG. This is not supposed to happen as developers should never have
hardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ...
If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and the
system is booted /DEBUG. This will let us see why this breakpoint is
happening.
Arguments:
Arg1: c0000005, The exception code that was not handled
Arg2: 8e70bba3, The address that the exception occurred at
Arg3: 9b7e3a84, Trap Frame
Arg4: 00000000
Debugging Details:
------------------
EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.
FAULTING_IP:
win32k!MultiUserGreTrackRemoveEngResource+1c
8e70bba3 8901 mov dword ptr [ecx],eax
TRAP_FRAME: 9b7e3a84 -- (.trap 0xffffffff9b7e3a84)
ErrCode = 00000002
eax=fa42ce68 ebx=fa42ce78 ecx=00000000 edx=00000000 esi=ff73a000 edi=fc4a4fc8
eip=8e70bba3 esp=9b7e3af8 ebp=9b7e3af8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na pe nc
cs=0008 ss=0010 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00010246
win32k!MultiUserGreTrackRemoveEngResource+0x1c:
8e70bba3 8901 mov dword ptr [ecx],eax ds:0023:00000000=????????
Resetting default scope
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT
BUGCHECK_STR: 0x8E
PROCESS_NAME: csrss.exe
CURRENT_IRQL: 2
ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) x86fre
LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 82933d87 to 828cf978
STACK_TEXT:
9b7e303c 82933d87 00000003 1d46c818 00000065 nt!RtlpBreakWithStatusInstruction
9b7e308c 82934885 00000003 9b7e3490 00000000 nt!KiBugCheckDebugBreak+0x1c
9b7e3450 82933c24 0000008e c0000005 8e70bba3 nt!KeBugCheck2+0x68b
9b7e3474 829092a7 0000008e c0000005 8e70bba3 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x1e
9b7e3a14 828929a6 9b7e3a30 00000000 9b7e3a84 nt!KiDispatchException+0x1ac
9b7e3a7c 8289295a 9b7e3af8 8e70bba3 badb0d00 nt!CommonDispatchException+0x4a
9b7e3af8 8e70bbe6 ff73a000 fb77cd28 9b7e3b20 nt!Kei386EoiHelper+0x192
9b7e3b08 8e7ef63d ff73a010 8e7ef5c0 fb784cf0 win32k!EngFreeMem+0x16
9b7e3b20 8e7ef67c fa42ce78 9b7e3b98 9b7e3b3c win32k!ttfdCloseFontContext+0x51
9b7e3b30 8e7ef5d8 fb784cf0 9b7e3b74 8e7ef1f8 win32k!ttfdDestroyFont+0x16
9b7e3b3c 8e7ef1f8 fb784cf0 fe38ccf0 9b7e3bd8 win32k!ttfdSemDestroyFont+0x18
9b7e3b74 8e7ef41b fb784cf0 fe38ccf0 00000000 win32k!PDEVOBJ::DestroyFont+0x67
9b7e3ba4 8e7749c3 00000000 00000000 00000001 win32k!RFONTOBJ::vDeleteRFONT+0x33
9b7e3bcc 8e77660f 9b7e3bf0 fb784cf0 00000000 win32k!vRestartKillRFONTList+0x8d
9b7e3c00 8e84100e 00000006 fb284fc0 8eaf8fc8 win32k!PFTOBJ::bUnloadWorkhorse+0x15f
9b7e3c28 82891dc6 0500019c 002cf9cc 76e26bf4 win32k!GreRemoveFontMemResourceEx+0x60
9b7e3c28 76e26bf4 0500019c 002cf9cc 76e26bf4 nt!KiSystemServicePostCall
002cf9cc 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
---
And:
---
PAGE_FAULT_IN_FREED_SPECIAL_POOL (cc)
Memory was referenced after it was freed.
This cannot be protected by try-except.
When possible, the guilty driver's name (Unicode string) is printed on
the bugcheck screen and saved in KiBugCheckDriver.
Arguments:
Arg1: fc1ffa54, memory referenced
Arg2: 00000001, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
Arg3: 82848a05, if non-zero, the address which referenced memory.
Arg4: 00000000, Mm internal code.
Debugging Details:
------------------
WRITE_ADDRESS: fc1ffa54 Special pool
FAULTING_IP:
nt!memset+45
82848a05 f3ab rep stos dword ptr es:[edi]
MM_INTERNAL_CODE: 0
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT
BUGCHECK_STR: 0xCC
PROCESS_NAME: csrss.exe
CURRENT_IRQL: 2
ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) x86fre
TRAP_FRAME: 8fb73d58 -- (.trap 0xffffffff8fb73d58)
ErrCode = 00000002
eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=00000001 edx=00000000 esi=00000004 edi=fc1ffa54
eip=82848a05 esp=8fb73dcc ebp=8fb73e28 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc
cs=0008 ss=0010 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00010202
nt!memset+0x45:
82848a05 f3ab rep stos dword ptr es:[edi]
Resetting default scope
LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 828eed87 to 8288a978
STACK_TEXT:
8fb738ac 828eed87 00000003 766f335a 00000065 nt!RtlpBreakWithStatusInstruction
8fb738fc 828ef885 00000003 00000000 0000000a nt!KiBugCheckDebugBreak+0x1c
8fb73cc0 8289d94d 00000050 fc1ffa54 00000001 nt!KeBugCheck2+0x68b
8fb73d40 8284ffa8 00000001 fc1ffa54 00000000 nt!MmAccessFault+0x104
8fb73d40 82848a05 00000001 fc1ffa54 00000000 nt!KiTrap0E+0xdc
8fb73dcc 8f15cca0 fc1ffa54 00000000 00000004 nt!memset+0x45
8fb73e28 8f050c00 0000000b 00000004 c0000002 win32k!sbit_Embolden+0x34d
8fb73e68 8efc3e10 fb972fd0 fc200ea0 faec6040 win32k!sbit_GetBitmap+0x18c
8fb73eb4 8efc9ff1 fc200010 fc20007c faec6040 win32k!fs_ContourScan+0x192
8fb73ff8 8efbef89 00000028 00000020 faec6000 win32k!lGetGlyphBitmap+0x1aa
8fb74020 8efbedd6 00000000 00000001 00000020 win32k!ttfdQueryFontData+0x15e
8fb74070 8efbdff2 fbf98010 fa794cf0 00000001 win32k!ttfdSemQueryFontData+0x45
8fb740b8 8f14eef5 fbf98010 fa794cf0 00000001 win32k!PDEVOBJ::QueryFontData+0x3e
8fb740e8 8f14ef48 fc586f20 ffa84130 8fb74114 win32k!RFONTOBJ::bInsertGlyphbitsLookaside+0xa7
8fb740f8 8f050663 0000000a fc586f20 8fb74798 win32k!RFONTOBJ::cGetGlyphDataLookaside+0x1c
8fb74114 8f03b2fc 8fb74798 8fb74148 8fb74144 win32k!STROBJ_bEnum+0x6c
8fb7414c 8f03b4d9 00000001 8fb74358 00000d0d win32k!GetTempTextBufferMetrics+0x61
8fb743d4 8ee34042 fc1cadb8 8fb74798 fa794cf0 win32k!EngTextOut+0x26
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
8fb74410 8f13cce0 fb16edb8 8fb74798 fa794cf0 VBoxDisp+0x4042
8fb7446c 8f03dbcb fef7cc90 8fb74798 fa794cf0 win32k!WatchdogDrvTextOut+0x51
8fb744b8 8f03de38 8f13cc8f 8fb74724 fb16edb8 win32k!OffTextOut+0x71
8fb7473c 8f03d9a8 fb16edb8 8fb74798 fa794cf0 win32k!SpTextOut+0x1a2
8fb74a38 8efcc2d4 8fb74bfc fc0b8e20 fc0b8e7c win32k!GreExtTextOutWLocked+0x1040
8fb74ab4 8f01f251 00000000 ff7bf064 00001000 win32k!GreBatchTextOut+0x1e6
8fb74c24 8284cd5c 000000bc 001afd88 001afdb4 win32k!NtGdiFlushUserBatch+0x123
8fb74c34 76f16bf3 badb0d00 001afd88 00000000 nt!KiSystemServiceAccessTeb+0x10
8fb74c38 badb0d00 001afd88 00000000 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCall+0x3
8fb74c3c 001afd88 00000000 00000000 00000000 0xbadb0d00
8fb74c40 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x1afd88
---
While the two above crashes look differently, we believe they manifest a single security issue, as they occur interchangeably with our proof of concept files. The first one is a NULL pointer dereference while performing a list unlinking operation, while the second is an attempt to write to memory which has already been freed, and they both indicate a use-after-free condition. While we have not determined the specific root cause of the vulnerability, we have pinpointed the offending mutations to reside in the "OS/2" and "VDMX" tables.
The issue reproduces on Windows 7 and 8.1. It is easiest to reproduce with Special Pools enabled for win32k.sys (leading to an immediate crash when the bug is triggered), but it is also possible to observe a crash on a default Windows installation. In order to reproduce the problem with the provided samples, it might be necessary to use a custom program which displays all of the font's glyphs at various point sizes. It is also required for the "Adjust for best performance" option to be set in "System > Advanced system settings > Advanced > Performance > Settings", most likely due to the "Smooth edges of screen fonts" getting unchecked.
Attached is an archive with three proof of concept font files.
Proof of Concept:
https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/40599.zip
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Microsoft>>Live_meeting >> Version 2007
Microsoft>>Lync >> Version 2010
Microsoft>>Lync >> Version 2010
Microsoft>>Lync >> Version 2013
Microsoft>>Office >> Version 2007
Microsoft>>Office >> Version 2010
Microsoft>>Skype_for_business >> Version 2016
Microsoft>>Word_viewer >> Version -
Microsoft>>Windows_10 >> Version -
Microsoft>>Windows_10 >> Version 1511
Microsoft>>Windows_10 >> Version 1607
Microsoft>>Windows_7 >> Version -
Microsoft>>Windows_8.1 >> Version *
Microsoft>>Windows_rt_8.1 >> Version -
Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -
Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version r2
Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version -
Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version r2
Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -
References