CVE-2011-1609 : Détail

CVE-2011-1609

SQL Injection
A03-Injection
0.23%V3
Network
2011-05-03
20h00 +00:00
2017-08-16
12h57 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x before 6.1(5)su2, 7.x before 7.1(5)su1, 8.0 before 8.0(3), and 8.5 before 8.5(1) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCtg85647.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V2 8.5 AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 35672

Date de publication : 2011-04-26 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Alberto Revelli
EDB Vérifié : Yes

source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47607/info Cisco Unified Communications Manager is prone to multiple SQL-injection vulnerabilities because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data before using it in an SQL query. Exploiting this issue could allow an authenticated attacker to compromise the affected device, access or modify data, or exploit latent vulnerabilities in the underlying database. http://www.example.com/ccmcip/xmldirectorylist.jsp?f=vsr'||0/1%20OR%201=1))%20-- http://www.example.com/ccmcip/xmldirectorylist.jsp?f=vsr'||1/0%20OR%201=1))%20--

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.0

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(1\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(1a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(1b\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(2\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(2\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(2\)su1a

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(3\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(3a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(3b\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(3b\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(4\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(4\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(4a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(4a\)su2

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(5\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 6.1\(5\)su1

Configuraton 0

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.0\(1\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.0\(1\)su1a

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.0\(2\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.0\(2a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.0\(2a\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.0\(2a\)su2

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(2a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(2a\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(2b\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3a\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3a\)su1a

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3b\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3b\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(3b\)su2

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(5\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(5\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(5\)su1a

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(5a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 7.1\(5b\)

Configuraton 0

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.0\(2c\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.0\(2c\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.0\(3\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.0\(3a\)

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.0\(3a\)su1

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.0\(3a\)su2

Cisco>>Unified_communications_manager >> Version 8.5

Références

http://secunia.com/advisories/44331
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025449
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1122
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47605
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID