CVE-2015-1725 : Détail

CVE-2015-1725

Overflow
7.9%V3
Local
2015-06-09
23h00 +00:00
2018-10-12
17h57 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Buffer overflow in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2 and R2 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V2 7.2 AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 38271

Date de publication : 2015-09-21 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Nils Sommer
EDB Vérifié : Yes

Source: https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=312 This issue is very likely a null pointer issue affecting 32-bit Windows version. The offset is from add onto another offset which isn't quite zero, so not 100% convinced it is just a null pointer, however I wasn't able to influence the values. because it was very straight forward to get EIP there is a PoC setting EIP to 0xdeadbeef Debug output attached. Proof of Concept: https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/38271.zip
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 38270

Date de publication : 2015-09-21 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Nils Sommer
EDB Vérifié : Yes

Source: https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=313 The PoC triggers a pool buffer overflow in win32k!vSolidFillRect. When using Special Pool we get the crash immediately on the overwrite. Without Special Pool we often get a crash in the same function, but sometimes it crashes in a different function (similar to another issue, however with a different offset). This might be a result of the memory corruption or an out-of-memory condition before the overflow is triggered. Debugger output for all three different crashes attached. Proof of Concept: https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/38270.zip

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Windows_7 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_8 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_8.1 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_rt >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_rt_8.1 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Références

http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032525
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38270/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38271/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB