Modes d'introduction
Implementation
Plateformes applicables
Langue
Name: Java (Undetermined)
Conséquences courantes
Portée |
Impact |
Probabilité |
Integrity Other | Modify Application Data, Alter Execution Logic | |
Mesures d’atténuation potentielles
Phases : Implementation
While double-checked locking can be achieved in some languages, it is inherently flawed in Java before 1.5, and cannot be achieved without compromising platform independence. Before Java 1.5, only use of the synchronized keyword is known to work. Beginning in Java 1.5, use of the "volatile" keyword allows double-checked locking to work successfully, although there is some debate as to whether it achieves sufficient performance gains. See references.
Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Références
REF-490
The "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" Declaration
David Bacon et al.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html REF-491
JSR 133 (Java Memory Model) FAQ
Jeremy Manson and Brian Goetz.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/jsr-133-faq.html#dcl REF-62
The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.
Soumission
Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Date de publication |
Version |
Anonymous Tool Vendor (under NDA) |
|
2007-05-07 +00:00 |
2007-05-07 +00:00 |
Draft 6 |
Modifications
Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Commentaire |
Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Context_Notes |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Description, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-24 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-01-12 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, References, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |