Détail du CWE-609

CWE-609

Double-Checked Locking
Draft
2007-05-07
00h00 +00:00
2025-04-03
00h00 +00:00
Notifications pour un CWE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CWE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Nom: Double-Checked Locking

The product uses double-checked locking to access a resource without the overhead of explicit synchronization, but the locking is insufficient.

Description du CWE

Double-checked locking refers to the situation where a programmer checks to see if a resource has been initialized, grabs a lock, checks again to see if the resource has been initialized, and then performs the initialization if it has not occurred yet. This should not be done, as it is not guaranteed to work in all languages and on all architectures. In summary, other threads may not be operating inside the synchronous block and are not guaranteed to see the operations execute in the same order as they would appear inside the synchronous block.

Informations générales

Modes d'introduction

Implementation

Plateformes applicables

Langue

Name: Java (Undetermined)

Conséquences courantes

Portée Impact Probabilité
Integrity
Other
Modify Application Data, Alter Execution Logic

Mesures d’atténuation potentielles

Phases : Implementation
While double-checked locking can be achieved in some languages, it is inherently flawed in Java before 1.5, and cannot be achieved without compromising platform independence. Before Java 1.5, only use of the synchronized keyword is known to work. Beginning in Java 1.5, use of the "volatile" keyword allows double-checked locking to work successfully, although there is some debate as to whether it achieves sufficient performance gains. See references.

Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités

Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Références

REF-490

The "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" Declaration
David Bacon et al.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html

REF-491

JSR 133 (Java Memory Model) FAQ
Jeremy Manson and Brian Goetz.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/jsr-133-faq.html#dcl

REF-62

The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.

Soumission

Nom Organisation Date Date de publication Version
Anonymous Tool Vendor (under NDA) 2007-05-07 +00:00 2007-05-07 +00:00 Draft 6

Modifications

Nom Organisation Date Commentaire
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Context_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Description, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-11-24 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-01-12 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-05-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-10-29 +00:00 updated Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-12-13 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-10-30 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-01-03 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-04-03 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples