Modes d'introduction
Architecture and Design
Implementation
Conséquences courantes
Portée |
Impact |
Probabilité |
Other | Other | |
Exemples observés
Références |
Description |
| download a file to arbitrary folders. |
| control downloads and executes a url in a parameter |
| resultant buffer overflow |
Mesures d’atténuation potentielles
Phases : Implementation
If you must expose a method, make sure to perform input validation on all arguments, and protect against all possible vulnerabilities.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Use code signing, although this does not protect against any weaknesses that are already in the control.
Phases : Architecture and Design // System Configuration
Where possible, avoid marking the control as safe for scripting.
Méthodes de détection
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Efficacité : High
Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Références
REF-503
Developing Secure ActiveX Controls
Microsoft.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions//ms533046(v=vs.85)?redirectedfrom=MSDN REF-62
The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.
Soumission
Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Date de publication |
Version |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2007-05-07 +00:00 |
2007-05-07 +00:00 |
Draft 6 |
Modifications
Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Commentaire |
Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Observed_Example, Other_Notes, Weakness_Ordinalities |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Type |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Description, Other_Notes |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, References, Relationships, Type |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |