CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive product information via vectors related to an error page. IBM X-Force ID: 92072. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
The ActiveMQ admin user interface in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging knowledge of the port number and webapp path. IBM X-Force ID: 92259. | 8.1 |
High |
||
XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted XML data. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
The HTTP Server Adapter in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2.x and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection-slot exhaustion) via a crafted HTTP request. | 5 |
|||
XMLscanner.java in Apache Xerces2 Java Parser before 2.12.0, as used in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 as well as Oracle Java SE 7u40 and earlier, Java SE 6u60 and earlier, Java SE 5.0u51 and earlier, JRockit R28.2.8 and earlier, JRockit R27.7.6 and earlier, Java SE Embedded 7u40 and earlier, and possibly other products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via vectors related to XML attribute names. | 7.1 |
|||
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via vectors involving the RNVisibility page and unspecified screens, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0560. | 6.5 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session. | 5 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to hijack sessions via a modified cookie path. | 4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. | 4 |
|||
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2983. | 3.5 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, and CVE-2013-0567. | 4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary FTP commands via unspecified vectors. | 6.4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not properly restrict file types and extensions, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted filename. | 4 |
|||
The console in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote attackers to read stack traces by triggering (1) an error or (2) an exception. | 5 |
|||
An unspecified third-party component in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 uses short session ID values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack sessions, and consequently obtain sensitive information, via a brute-force attack. | 5 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors. | 5 |
|||
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-5766. | 6.5 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, and CVE-2013-0475. | 4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. | 4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to upload arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | 6.5 |
|||
Directory traversal vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote authenticated users to read or modify files via unspecified vectors. | 6.5 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. | 4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. | 4 |
|||
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. | 4 |
|||
Unspecified vulnerability in the CLA2 server in IBM Gentran Integration Suite 4.3, Sterling Integrator 5.0 and 5.1, and Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2, as used in IBM Sterling File Gateway 1.1 through 2.2 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unknown vectors. | 9.3 |