Modes Of Introduction
Implementation
Applicable Platforms
Language
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Common Consequences
Scope |
Impact |
Likelihood |
Confidentiality | Read Application Data | |
Observed Examples
References |
Description |
| Password exposed in debug information. |
| CGI script includes sensitive information in debug messages when an error is triggered. |
| FTP client with debug option enabled shows password to the screen. |
Potential Mitigations
Phases : Implementation
Do not leave debug statements that could be executed in the source code. Ensure that all debug information is eradicated before releasing the software.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
Detection Methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness : High
Vulnerability Mapping Notes
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Comment : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
NotesNotes
This overlaps other categories.
Submission
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Date release |
Version |
PLOVER |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Modifications
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Comment |
Sean Eidemiller |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
added/updated demonstrative examples |
Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
|
Veracode |
2008-08-15 +00:00 |
Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Relationship_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-09-27 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, Observed_Examples |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-06-23 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction, Type |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-12-10 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |