Modes Of Introduction
Operation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Applicable Platforms
Language
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Common Consequences
Scope |
Impact |
Likelihood |
Availability | DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)
Note: Log files can become so large that they consume excessive resources, such as disk and CPU, which can hinder the performance of the system. | |
Non-Repudiation | Hide Activities
Note: Logging too much information can make the log files of less use to forensics analysts and developers when trying to diagnose a problem or recover from an attack. | |
Non-Repudiation | Hide Activities
Note: If system administrators are unable to effectively process log files, attempted attacks may go undetected, possibly leading to eventual system compromise. | |
Observed Examples
References |
Description |
| server records a large amount of data to the server log when it receives malformed headers |
| chain: application does not restrict access to front-end for updates, which allows attacker to fill the error log |
Potential Mitigations
Phases : Architecture and Design
Suppress large numbers of duplicate log messages and replace them with periodic summaries. For example, syslog may include an entry that states "last message repeated X times" when recording repeated events.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Support a maximum size for the log file that can be controlled by the administrator. If the maximum size is reached, the admin should be notified. Also, consider reducing functionality of the product. This may result in a denial-of-service to legitimate product users, but it will prevent the product from adversely impacting the entire system.
Phases : Implementation
Adjust configurations appropriately when the product is transitioned from a debug state to production.
Vulnerability Mapping Notes
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Comment : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Submission
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Date release |
Version |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-07-02 +00:00 |
2009-07-27 +00:00 |
1.5 |
Modifications
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Comment |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Likelihood_of_Exploit, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |