CAPEC-19

Embedding Scripts within Scripts
HIGH
HIGH
Stable
2014-06-23 00:00 +00:00
2023-01-24 00:00 +00:00

Alerte pour un CAPEC

Stay informed of any changes for a specific CAPEC.
Alert management

Description

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

Informations

Execution Flow

1) Explore

[Spider] Using a browser or an automated tool, an adversary records all entry points for inputs that happen to be reflected in a client-side script element. These script elements can be located in the HTML content (head, body, comments), in an HTML tag, XML, CSS, etc.

Technique
  • Use a spidering tool to follow and record all non-static links that are likely to have input parameters (through forms, URL, fragments, etc.) actively used by the Web application.
  • Use a proxy tool to record all links visited during a manual traversal of the web application.
  • Use a browser to manually explore the website and analyze how it is constructed. Many browsers' plugins are available to facilitate the analysis or automate the discovery.

2) Experiment

[Probe identified potential entry points for XSS vulnerability] The adversary uses the entry points gathered in the "Explore" phase as a target list and injects various common script payloads to determine if an entry point actually represents a vulnerability and to characterize the extent to which the vulnerability can be exploited.

Technique
  • Manually inject various script payloads into each identified entry point using a list of common script injection probes that typically work in a client-side script elements context and observe system behavior to determine if script was executed.
  • Manually inject various script payloads into each identified entry point using a list of common script injection probes that typically work in a server-side script elements context and observe system behavior to determine if script was executed.
  • Use an automated injection attack tool to inject various script payloads into each identified entry point using a list of common script injection probes that typically work in a client-side script elements context and observe system behavior to determine if script was executed.
  • Use an automated injection attack tool to inject various script payloads into each identified entry point using a list of common script injection probes that typically work in a server-side script elements context and observe system behavior to determine if script was executed.
  • Use a proxy tool to record results of the created requests.

3) Exploit

[Steal session IDs, credentials, page content, etc.] As the adversary succeeds in exploiting the vulnerability, they can choose to steal user's credentials in order to reuse or to analyze them later on.

Technique
  • Develop malicious JavaScript that is injected through vectors identified during the Experiment Phase and loaded by the victim's browser and sends document information to the adversary.
  • Develop malicious JavaScript that injected through vectors identified during the Experiment Phase and takes commands from an adversary's server and then causes the browser to execute appropriately.

4) Exploit

[Forceful browsing] When the adversary targets the current application or another one (through CSRF vulnerabilities), the user will then be the one who perform the attacks without being aware of it. These attacks are mostly targeting application logic flaws, but it can also be used to create a widespread attack against a particular website on the user's current network (Internet or not).

Technique
  • Develop malicious JavaScript that is injected through vectors identified during the Experiment Phase and loaded by the victim's browser and performs actions on the same web site
  • Develop malicious JavaScript that injected through vectors identified during the Experiment Phase and takes commands from an adversary's server and then causes the browser to execute request to other web sites (especially the web applications that have CSRF vulnerabilities).

5) Exploit

[Content spoofing] By manipulating the content, the adversary targets the information that the user would like to get from the website.

Technique
  • Develop malicious JavaScript that is injected through vectors identified during the Experiment Phase and loaded by the victim's browser and exposes adversary-modified invalid information to the user on the current web page.

Prerequisites

Target software must be able to execute scripts, and also grant the adversary privilege to write/upload scripts.

Skills Required

To load malicious script into open, e.g. world writable directory
Executing remote scripts on host and collecting output

Mitigations

Use browser technologies that do not allow client side scripting.
Utilize strict type, character, and encoding enforcement.
Server side developers should not proxy content via XHR or other means. If a HTTP proxy for remote content is setup on the server side, the client's browser has no way of discerning where the data is originating from.
Ensure all content that is delivered to client is sanitized against an acceptable content specification.
Perform input validation for all remote content.
Perform output validation for all remote content.
Disable scripting languages such as JavaScript in browser
Session tokens for specific host
Patching software. There are many attack vectors for XSS on the client side and the server side. Many vulnerabilities are fixed in service packs for browser, web servers, and plug in technologies, staying current on patch release that deal with XSS countermeasures mitigates this.
Privileges are constrained, if a script is loaded, ensure system runs in chroot jail or other limited authority mode

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

Submission

Name Organization Date Date Release
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2014-06-23 +00:00

Modifications

Name Organization Date Comment
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2017-05-01 +00:00 Updated Attack_Prerequisites, Description Summary, References, Related_Attack_Patterns, Related_Weaknesses, Resources_Required, Solutions_and_Mitigations
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2017-08-04 +00:00 Updated Description Summary
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2018-07-31 +00:00 Updated Examples-Instances, References
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2020-07-30 +00:00 Updated Description, Execution_Flow, Taxonomy_Mappings
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2022-02-22 +00:00 Updated Description, Example_Instances, Execution_Flow, Extended_Description
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2022-09-29 +00:00 Updated Example_Instances
CAPEC Content Team The MITRE Corporation 2023-01-24 +00:00 Updated Taxonomy_Mappings
Click on the button to the left (OFF), to authorize the inscription of cookie improving the functionalities of the site. Click on the button to the left (Accept all), to unauthorize the inscription of cookie improving the functionalities of the site.