CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
---|---|---|---|---|
IBM App Connect V11.0.0.0 through V11.0.0.1, IBM Integration Bus V10.0.0.0 through V10.0.0.13, IBM Integration Bus V9.0.0.0 through V9.0.0.10, and WebSphere Message Broker V8.0.0.0 through V8.0.0.9 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 149639. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
IBM Integration Bus 9.0.0.0, 9.0.0.11, 10.0.0.0, and 10.0.0.14 (including IBM WebSphere Message Broker 8.0.0.0 and 8.0.0.9) has insecure permissions on certain files. A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability to modify or delete these files with an unknown impact. IBM X-Force ID: 127406. | 5.5 |
Medium |
||
IBM WebSphere Message Broker (IBM Integration Bus 9.0 and 10.0) could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information about software versions that could lead to further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 121341. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
IBM WebSphere Message Broker could allow a local user with specialized access to prevent the message broker from starting. IBM X-Force ID: 122033. | 2.5 |
Low |
||
IBM WebSphere Message Broker stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 123777. | 5.5 |
Medium |
||
IBM Integration Bus and WebSphere Message broker sets incorrect permissions for an object that could allow a local attacker to manipulate certain files. | 3.3 |
Low |
||
The integration server in IBM Integration Bus 9 before 9.0.0.6 and 10 before 10.0.0.5 and WebSphere Message Broker 8 before 8.0.0.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive Tomcat version information by sending a malformed POST request and then reading the Java stack trace. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
IBM WebSphere Message Broker 7 before 7.0.0.8 and 8 before 8.0.0.6 and IBM Integration Bus 9 before 9.0.0.3 and 10 before 10.0.0.0 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about the HTTP server via unspecified vectors. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
IBM WebSphere Message Broker 8 before 8.0.0.6 and Integration Bus 9 before 9.0.0.4 do not check authorization for MQSISTARTMSGFLOW and MQSISTOPMSGFLOW commands, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions, and start or stop a service, by issuing a command. | 3.2 |
|||
IBM Integration Bus 9 and 10 before 10.0.0.1 and WebSphere Message Broker 7 before 7.0.0.8 and 8 before 8.0.0.7 do not ensure that the correct security profile is selected, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | 3.5 |
|||
IBM WebSphere Message Broker Toolkit 7 before 7007 IF2 and 8 before 8005 IF1 and Integration Toolkit 9 before 9003 IF1 are distributed with MQ client JAR files that support only weak TLS ciphers, which might make it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network during a connection to an Integration Bus node. | 4.3 |
|||
The HTTPInput node in IBM WebSphere Message Broker 7.0 before 7.0.0.8 and 8.0 before 8.0.0.6 and IBM Integration Bus 9.0 before 9.0.0.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by triggering a SOAP fault. | 5 |
|||
The web user interface in IBM WebSphere Message Broker 8.0 before 8.0.0.6 and IBM Integration Bus 9.0 before 9.0.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information by reading the error page. | 4 |
|||
The XML4J parser in IBM WebSphere Message Broker 6.1 before 6.1.0.12, 7.0 before 7.0.0.7, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.4 and IBM Integration Bus 9.0 before 9.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted XML document that triggers expansion for many entities. | 4.3 |
|||
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0 before 7.0.0.29, 8.0 before 8.0.0.6, and 8.5 through 8.5.0.2 and WebSphere Message Broker 6.1, 7.0 through 7.0.0.5, and 8.0 through 8.0.0.2, when WS-Security is used, allows remote attackers to spoof the signatures of messages via a crafted SOAP message, related to a "Signature Wrap attack," a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1377 and CVE-2013-0489. | 4.3 |