CPE Details
Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 5.8
5.8
2018-10-30
13h18 +00:00
13h18 +00:00
2018-10-30
13h18 +00:00
13h18 +00:00
Alerte pour un CPE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CPE.
CPE Name: cpe:2.3:a:redhat:cloudforms_management_engine:5.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Informations
Vendor
redhatProduct
cloudforms_management_engineVersion
5.8Related CVE
| CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A high severity vulnerability was found in all active versions of Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0. The out of band OS command injection vulnerability can be exploited by authenticated attacker while setuping conversion host through Infrastructure Migration Solution. This flaw allows attacker to execute arbitrary commands on CloudForms server. | 9.1 |
Critical |
||
| CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header | 8.8 |
High |
||
| cloudforms version, cloudforms 5.8 and cloudforms 5.9, is vulnerable to a cross-site-scripting. A flaw was found in CloudForms's v2v infrastructure mapping delete feature. A stored cross-site scripting due to improper sanitization of user input in Name field. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| A flaw was found in the CloudForms web interface, versions 5.8 - 5.10, where the RSS feed URLs are not properly restricted to authenticated users only. An attacker could use this flaw to view potentially sensitive information from CloudForms including data such as newly created virtual machines. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
| A flaw was found in the CloudForms API before 5.6.3.0, 5.7.3.1 and 5.8.1.2. A user with permissions to use the MiqReportResults capability within the API could potentially view data from other tenants or groups to which they should not have access. | 4.3 |
Medium |
||
| A flaw was found in CloudForms before 5.9.0.22 in the self-service UI snapshot feature where the name field is not properly sanitized for HTML and JavaScript input. An attacker could use this flaw to execute a stored XSS attack on an application administrator using CloudForms. Please note that CSP (Content Security Policy) prevents exploitation of this XSS however not all browsers support CSP. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1 lacks RBAC controls on certain methods in the rails application portion of CloudForms. An attacker with access could use a variety of methods within the rails application portion of CloudForms to escalate privileges. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) is vulnerable to an improper security setting in the dRuby component of CloudForms. An attacker with access to an unprivileged local shell could use this flaw to execute commands as a high privileged user. | 7.8 |
High |
2025©
tesweb SA
