CPE Details
Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Cumulative Update 6
2013
2019-11-05
15h05 +00:00
15h05 +00:00
2019-11-05
15h05 +00:00
15h05 +00:00
Alerte pour un CPE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CPE.
CPE Name: cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:exchange_server:2013:cumulative_update_6:*:*:*:*:*:*
Informations
Vendor
microsoftProduct
exchange_serverVersion
2013Update
cumulative_update_6Related CVE
| CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft Exchange Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected Exchange server, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability'. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, 1709 and Windows Server 2016, Windows Server, version 1709, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to remote code execution. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This is different than CVE-2017-11937. | 7.8 |
High |
||
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, 1709 and Windows Server 2016, Windows Server, version 1709, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to remote code execution. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". | 7.8 |
High |
||
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8540 and CVE-2017-8541. | 7.8 |
High |
||
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, and CVE-2017-8542. | 5.5 |
Medium |
||
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8538 and CVE-2017-8540. | 7.8 |
High |
||
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, and CVE-2017-8539. | 5.5 |
Medium |
||
| Outlook Web App (OWA) in Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 SP3, 2010 SP3, and 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 6 does not properly validate tokens in requests, which allows remote attackers to spoof the origin of e-mail messages via unspecified vectors, aka "Outlook Web App Token Spoofing Vulnerability." | 5 |
|||
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 6 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, aka "OWA XSS Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-6326. | 4.3 |
|||
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 6 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, aka "OWA XSS Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-6325. | 4.3 |
|||
| Outlook Web App (OWA) in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 6 does not properly validate redirection tokens, which allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and spoof the origin of e-mail messages via unspecified vectors, aka "Exchange URL Redirection Vulnerability." | 3.5 |
|||
| The (1) install and (2) upgrade processes in EMC NetWorker Module for Microsoft Applications (NMM) 2.2.1, 2.3 before build 122, and 2.4 before build 375, when Exchange Server is used, allow local users to read cleartext administrator credentials via unspecified vectors. | 2.1 |
|||
| The BlackBerry Collaboration Service in Research In Motion (RIM) BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) 5.0.3 through MR4 for Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Domino allows remote authenticated users to log into arbitrary user accounts associated with the same organization, and send messages, read messages, read contact lists, or cause a denial of service (login unavailability), via unspecified vectors. | 6.5 |
|||
| The installation of 1ArcServe Backup and Inoculan AV client modules for Exchange create a log file, exchverify.log, which contains usernames and passwords in plaintext. | 4.6 |
|||
| Microsoft email clients in Outlook, Exchange, and Windows Messaging automatically respond to Read Receipt and Delivery Receipt tags, which could allow an attacker to flood a mail system with responses by forging a Read Receipt request that is redirected to a large distribution list. | 5 |
