CPE Details
IBM Security Guardium 10.0
10.0
2015-11-09
17h11 +00:00
17h11 +00:00
2015-11-13
21h24 +00:00
21h24 +00:00
Alerte pour un CPE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CPE.
CPE Name: cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Informations
Vendor
ibmProduct
security_guardiumVersion
10.0Related CVE
| CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740. | 5.9 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152080. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152082. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the software does not also use a salt as part of the input. IBM X-Force ID: 124743. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 150021. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 150022. | 9.8 |
Critical |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, and 10.1 through 10.1.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124675. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 124684. | 4.3 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 124736. | 3.3 |
Low |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124737. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124741. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not renew a session variable after a successful authentication which could lead to session fixation/hijacking vulnerability. This could force a user to utilize a cookie that may be known to an attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 124745. | 3.3 |
Low |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132549. | 5.5 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132550. | 5.5 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 132611. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 132613. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 135858. | 8.8 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 124633. | 9.9 |
Critical |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 124634. | 7.1 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, 9.5, 10.0, and 10.1 transmits sensitive data in cleartext in the query of the request. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 110409 | 3.7 |
Low |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124678 | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 does not perform an authentication check for a critical resource or functionality allowing anonymous users access to protected areas. IBM X-Force ID: 124685 | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-force ID: 124744 | 9.8 |
Critical |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 8.2, 9.0, and 10.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow a local attacker with CLI access to inject arbitrary commands which would be executed as root. IBM X-Force ID: 121174. | 7.4 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor appliance could allow a local user to inject commands that would be executed as root. | 7.8 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 10.x through 10.1 before p100 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information by reading an Application Error message. | 4.3 |
Medium |
||
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Security Guardium 8.2 before p310, 9.x through 9.5 before p700, and 10.x through 10.1 before p100 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 8.2 before p310, 9.x through 9.5 before p700, and 10.x through 10.1 before p100 allows local users to obtain sensitive cleartext information via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by password information. | 7.8 |
High |
||
| SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor 8.2 before p310, 9.x through 9.5 before p700, and 10.x through 10.1 before p100 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | 8.6 |
High |
||
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0 before p700 and 10.0 before p100 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive query-string information from SSL sessions via unspecified vectors. | 3.7 |
Low |
||
| Directory traversal vulnerability in IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor 10 before 10.0p100 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| diag in IBM Security Guardium 8.2 before p6015, 9.0 before p6015, 9.1, 9.5, and 10.0 before p6015 allows local users to obtain root access via unspecified key sequences. | 7.2 |
