CPE Details
Alerte pour un CPE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CPE.
CPE Name: cpe:2.3:a:moodle:moodle:4.0.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Informations
Vendor
moodleProduct
moodleVersion
4.0.0Update
rc2Related CVE
| CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A vulnerability was found in Moodle. Additional checks are required to ensure users can only access the schedule of a report if they have permission to edit that report. | 4.3 |
Medium |
||
| A vulnerability was found in Moodle. Users with access to delete audiences from reports could delete audiences from other reports that they do not have permission to delete from. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| A vulnerability was found in Moodle. Additional checks are required to ensure users can only edit or delete RSS feeds that they have permission to modify. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| A vulnerability was found in Moodle. It is possible for users with the "send message" capability to view other users' names that they may not otherwise have access to via an error message in Messaging. Note: The name returned follows the full name format configured on the site. | 4.3 |
Medium |
||
| Incorrect CSRF token checks resulted in multiple CSRF risks. | 8.8 |
High |
||
| Actions in the admin management of analytics models did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk. | 8.8 |
High |
||
| Inadequate access control in Moodle LMS. This vulnerability could allow a local user with a student role to create arbitrary events intended for users with higher roles. It could also allow the attacker to add events to the calendar of all users without their prior consent. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| When duplicating a BigBlueButton activity, the original meeting ID was also duplicated instead of using a new ID for the new activity. This could provide unintended access to the original meeting. | 3.3 |
Low |
||
| Separate Groups mode restrictions were not honoured in the forum summary report, which would display users from other groups. | 3.3 |
Low |
||
| In a shared hosting environment that has been misconfigured to allow access to other users' content, a Moodle user who also has direct access to the web server outside of the Moodle webroot could utilise a local file include to achieve remote code execution. | 9.8 |
Critical |
||
| Insufficient web service capability checks made it possible to move categories a user had permission to manage, to a parent category they did not have the capability to manage. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
| Stronger revision number limitations were required on file serving endpoints to improve cache poisoning protection. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
| The course upload preview contained an XSS risk for users uploading unsafe data. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| ID numbers displayed in the quiz grading report required additional sanitizing to prevent a stored XSS risk. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| H5P metadata automatically populated the author with the user's username, which could be sensitive information. | 5.3 |
Medium |
||
| Wiki comments required additional sanitizing and access restrictions to prevent a stored XSS risk and potential IDOR risk. | 6.5 |
Medium |
||
| The CSV grade import method contained an XSS risk for users importing the spreadsheet, if it contained unsafe content. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| A remote code execution risk was identified in the IMSCP activity. By default this was only available to teachers and managers. | 8.8 |
High |
||
| A remote code execution risk was identified in the Lesson activity. By default this was only available to teachers and managers. | 8.8 |
High |
||
| Content on the groups page required additional sanitizing to prevent an XSS risk. This flaw affects Moodle versions 4.2, 4.1 to 4.1.3, 4.0 to 4.0.8 and 3.11 to 3.11.14. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| A limited SQL injection risk was identified on the Mnet SSO access control page. This flaw affects Moodle versions 4.2, 4.1 to 4.1.3, 4.0 to 4.0.8, 3.11 to 3.11.14, 3.9 to 3.9.21 and earlier unsupported versions. | 6.3 |
Medium |
||
| An issue in the logic used to check 0.0.0.0 against the cURL blocked hosts lists resulted in an SSRF risk. This flaw affects Moodle versions 4.2, 4.1 to 4.1.3, 4.0 to 4.0.8, 3.11 to 3.11.14, 3.9 to 3.9.21 and earlier unsupported versions. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| The vulnerability was found Moodle which exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in external Wiki method for listing pages. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted request to the affected application and execute limited SQL commands within the application database. | 7.3 |
High |
||
| The vulnerability was found Moodle which exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in some returnurl parameters. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website. This flaw allows a remote attacker to perform cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| The vulnerability was found Moodle which exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in blog search. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website. This flaw allows a remote attacker to perform cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| The vulnerability was found Moodle which exists due to insufficient limitations on the "start page" preference. A remote attacker can set that preference for another user. The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to otherwise restricted functionality. | 8.2 |
High |
||
| A blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in Moodle. This flaw exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in LTI provider library. The library does not utilise Moodle's inbuilt cURL helper, which resulted in a blind SSRF risk. An attacker can send a specially crafted HTTP request and trick the application to initiate requests to arbitrary systems. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform SSRF attacks. | 9.1 |
Critical |
||
| A vulnerability was found in Moodle which exists due to insufficient validation of the HTTP request origin in course redirect URL. A user's CSRF token was unnecessarily included in the URL when being redirected to a course they have just restored. A remote attacker can trick the victim to visit a specially crafted web page and perform arbitrary actions on behalf of the victim on the vulnerable website. This flaw allows an attacker to perform cross-site request forgery attacks. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability was discovered in Moodle. This flaw exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in policy tool. An attacker can trick the victim to open a specially crafted link that executes an arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website. This vulnerability may allow an attacker to perform cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks to gain access potentially sensitive information and modification of web pages. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| The stored-XSS vulnerability was discovered in Moodle which exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in several "social" user profile fields. An attacker could inject and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website. | 5.4 |
Medium |
||
| Enabling and disabling installed H5P libraries did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk. | 8.8 |
High |
||
| The H5P activity attempts report did not filter by groups, which in separate groups mode could reveal information to non-editing teachers about attempts/users in groups they should not have access to. | 4.3 |
Medium |
||
| A limited SQL injection risk was identified in the "browse list of users" site administration page. | 9.8 |
Critical |
||
| Recursive rendering of Mustache template helpers containing user input could, in some cases, result in an XSS risk or a page failing to load. | 7.1 |
High |
||
| A remote code execution risk when restoring backup files originating from Moodle 1.9 was identified. | 9.8 |
Critical |
||
| A reflected XSS issue was identified in the LTI module of Moodle. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in the LTI module. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website to steal potentially sensitive information, change appearance of the web page, can perform phishing and drive-by-download attacks. This vulnerability does not impact authenticated users. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| An open redirect issue was found in Moodle due to improper sanitization of user-supplied data in mobile auto-login feature. A remote attacker can create a link that leads to a trusted website, however, when clicked, it redirects the victims to arbitrary URL/domain. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to perform a phishing attack and steal potentially sensitive information. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| A stored XSS and blind SSRF vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in the SCORM track details. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website to steal potentially sensitive information, change appearance of the web page, can perform phishing and drive-by-download attacks. | 6.1 |
Medium |
||
| The vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to input validation error when importing lesson questions. This insufficient path checks results in arbitrary file read risk. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform directory traversal attacks. The capability to access this feature is only available to teachers, managers and admins by default. | 7.5 |
High |
||
| The vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to improper input validation when parsing PostScript code. An omitted execution parameter results in a remote code execution risk for sites running GhostScript versions older than 9.50. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may result in complete compromise of vulnerable system. | 9.8 |
Critical |
||
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Flash component infrastructure in YUI 2.4.0 through 2.8.1, as used in Bugzilla, Moodle, and other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to charts/assets/charts.swf. | 4.3 |
|||
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Flash component infrastructure in YUI 2.5.0 through 2.8.1, as used in Bugzilla, Moodle, and other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to uploader/assets/uploader.swf. | 4.3 |
|||
| SQL injection vulnerability in ing/blocks/mrbs/code/web/view_entry.php in the MRBS plugin for Moodle allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter. | 7.5 |
2025©
tesweb SA
