Cisco Aironet 1850 Firmware 8.9(4.58)

CPE Details

Cisco Aironet 1850 Firmware 8.9(4.58)
cisco
aironet_1850_firmware
8.9\(4.58\)
2019-10-21
14h38 +00:00
2021-04-19
12h00 +00:00
CPE NVD
Alerte pour un CPE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CPE.
Notifications manage

CPE Name: cpe:2.3:o:cisco:aironet_1850_firmware:8.9\(4.58\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Informations

Vendor

cisco

Product

aironet_1850_firmware

Version

8.9\(4.58\)

Related CVE

Open and find in CVE List

CVE ID Published Description Score Severity
CVE-2019-15264 2019-10-16 18h36 +00:00 A vulnerability in the Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol implementation of Cisco Aironet and Catalyst 9100 Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper resource management during CAPWAP message processing. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high volume of legitimate wireless management frames within a short time to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a device to restart unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition for clients associated with the AP.
6.5
Medium
CVE-2019-15261 2019-10-16 18h36 +00:00 A vulnerability in the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) VPN packet processing functionality in Cisco Aironet Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) frames that pass through the data plane of an affected AP. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by associating to a vulnerable AP, initiating a PPTP VPN connection to an arbitrary PPTP VPN server, and sending a malicious GRE frame through the data plane of the AP. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an internal process of the targeted AP to crash, which in turn would cause the AP to reload. The AP reload would cause a DoS condition for clients that are associated with the AP.
8.6
High