CVE-2009-3743 : Detail

CVE-2009-3743

4.46%V3
Network
2010-08-26
18h00 +00:00
2018-10-10
16h57 +00:00
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Off-by-one error in the Ins_MINDEX function in the TrueType bytecode interpreter in Ghostscript before 8.71 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a malformed TrueType font in a document that trigger an integer overflow and a heap-based buffer overflow.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-189 Category : Numeric Errors
Weaknesses in this category are related to improper calculation or conversion of numbers.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 6.0

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 6.01

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 6.50

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 7.00

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 7.03

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 7.04

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.00

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.11

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.12

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.13

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.14

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.50

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.51

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.52

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.53

Artifex>>Afpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.54

Artifex>>Ghostscript_fonts >> Version 6.0

Artifex>>Ghostscript_fonts >> Version 8.11

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version To (including) 8.70

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.01

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.15

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.50

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.51

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.54

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.56

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.57

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.60

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.61

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.62

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.63

Artifex>>Gpl_ghostscript >> Version 8.64

References

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0095.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-17.xml
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024785
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/644319
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN