CVE-2011-0696 : Detail

CVE-2011-0696

Cross-Site Request Forgery - CSRF
A01-Broken Access Control
0.38%V3
Network
2011-02-14
19h00 +00:00
2011-02-23
09h00 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V2 6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.1

Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.1.0

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.1.2

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.1.3

    Configuraton 0

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.2

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.2.1

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.2.2

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.2.3

    Djangoproject>>Django >> Version 1.2.4

    References

    http://secunia.com/advisories/43297
    Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
    http://secunia.com/advisories/43382
    Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
    http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0439
    Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
    http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0429
    Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
    http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/09/6
    Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
    http://secunia.com/advisories/43230
    Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
    http://secunia.com/advisories/43426
    Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
    http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0372
    Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
    http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0441
    Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN
    http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1066-1
    Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
    http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46296
    Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
    http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:031
    Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
    http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2163
    Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
    http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0388
    Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN