CVE-2015-8732 : Detail

CVE-2015-8732

5.5
/
Medium
A03-Injection
0.4%V3
Local
2016-01-04
01h00 +00:00
2016-12-05
13h57 +00:00
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

The dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp function in epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c in the ZigBee ZCL dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.9 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the Total Profile Number field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted packet.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.0 5.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

A vulnerability exploitable with Local access means that the vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack, and the attacker's path is via read/write/execute capabilities. In some cases, the attacker may be logged in locally in order to exploit the vulnerability, otherwise, she may rely on User Interaction to execute a malicious file.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

[email protected]
V2 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 38995

Publication date : 2015-12-15 23h00 +00:00
Author : Google Security Research
EDB Verified : Yes

Source: https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=661 The following crash due to a static out-of-bounds read can be observed in an ASAN build of Wireshark (current git master), by feeding a malformed file to tshark ("$ ./tshark -nVxr /path/to/file"): --- cut --- ==7849==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f8e33764094 at pc 0x7f8e29788726 bp 0x7ffe27806640 sp 0x7ffe27806638 READ of size 4 at 0x7f8e33764094 thread T0 #0 0x7f8e29788725 in dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3847:21 #1 0x7f8e2977f2be in dissect_zbee_zcl_pwr_prof wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3494:21 #2 0x7f8e271b0cc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #3 0x7f8e271a35ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #4 0x7f8e271ad2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #5 0x7f8e2719eccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #6 0x7f8e297738ac in dissect_zbee_zcl wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl.c:887:13 #7 0x7f8e271b0cc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #8 0x7f8e271a35ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #9 0x7f8e271ad2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #10 0x7f8e2719eccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #11 0x7f8e2974de40 in dissect_zbee_aps wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-aps.c:1029:21 #12 0x7f8e271b0cc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #13 0x7f8e271a35ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #14 0x7f8e271ad2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #15 0x7f8e2719eccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #16 0x7f8e29757897 in dissect_zbee_nwk_full wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:665:9 #17 0x7f8e297518aa in dissect_zbee_nwk wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:701:9 #18 0x7f8e29752ef7 in dissect_zbee_nwk_heur wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:337:5 #19 0x7f8e271ab417 in dissector_try_heuristic wireshark/epan/packet.c:2329:7 #20 0x7f8e2826863b in dissect_ieee802154_common wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.c:1139:17 #21 0x7f8e2825e35e in dissect_ieee802154 wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.c:561:5 #22 0x7f8e271b0cc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #23 0x7f8e271a35ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #24 0x7f8e271a2dbd in dissector_try_uint_new wireshark/epan/packet.c:1148:9 #25 0x7f8e27eb25f6 in dissect_frame wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-frame.c:500:11 #26 0x7f8e271b0cc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #27 0x7f8e271a35ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #28 0x7f8e271ad2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #29 0x7f8e2719eccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #30 0x7f8e2719e33b in dissect_record wireshark/epan/packet.c:501:3 #31 0x7f8e2714c3c9 in epan_dissect_run_with_taps wireshark/epan/epan.c:373:2 #32 0x5264eb in process_packet wireshark/tshark.c:3728:5 #33 0x51f960 in load_cap_file wireshark/tshark.c:3484:11 #34 0x515daf in main wireshark/tshark.c:2197:13 0x7f8e33764094 is located 44 bytes to the left of global variable 'ett_zbee_zcl_pwr_prof_enphases' defined in 'packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3329:13' (0x7f8e337640c0) of size 64 0x7f8e33764094 is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable 'ett_zbee_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofiles' defined in 'packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3328:13' (0x7f8e33764080) of size 20 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3847:21 in dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0ff2466e47c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ff2466e47d0: 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ff2466e47e0: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ff2466e47f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ff2466e4800: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 =>0x0ff2466e4810: 00 00[04]f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ff2466e4820: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ff2466e4830: 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ff2466e4840: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ff2466e4850: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ff2466e4860: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Heap right redzone: fb Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack partial redzone: f4 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==7849==ABORTING --- cut --- The crash was reported at https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11830. Attached are three files which trigger the crash. Update: there is also a similar crash due to out-of-bounds access to the global "ett_zbee_zcl_pwr_prof_enphases" array, see the report below. Attached is a file which triggers the crash. --- cut --- ==8228==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f0d4f321100 at pc 0x7f0d45344cd5 bp 0x7fff69e4e4a0 sp 0x7fff69e4e498 READ of size 4 at 0x7f0d4f321100 thread T0 #0 0x7f0d45344cd4 in dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_enphsschednotif wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3685:25 #1 0x7f0d4533bd04 in dissect_zbee_zcl_pwr_prof wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3463:21 #2 0x7f0d42d6dcc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #3 0x7f0d42d605ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #4 0x7f0d42d6a2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #5 0x7f0d42d5bccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #6 0x7f0d453308ac in dissect_zbee_zcl wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl.c:887:13 #7 0x7f0d42d6dcc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #8 0x7f0d42d605ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #9 0x7f0d42d6a2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #10 0x7f0d42d5bccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #11 0x7f0d4530b750 in dissect_zbee_apf wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-aps.c:1680:9 #12 0x7f0d42d6dcc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #13 0x7f0d42d605ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #14 0x7f0d42d6a2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #15 0x7f0d42d5bccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #16 0x7f0d4530aee1 in dissect_zbee_aps wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-aps.c:1033:13 #17 0x7f0d42d6dcc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #18 0x7f0d42d605ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #19 0x7f0d42d6a2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #20 0x7f0d42d5bccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #21 0x7f0d45314897 in dissect_zbee_nwk_full wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:665:9 #22 0x7f0d4530e8aa in dissect_zbee_nwk wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:701:9 #23 0x7f0d4530fef7 in dissect_zbee_nwk_heur wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:337:5 #24 0x7f0d42d68417 in dissector_try_heuristic wireshark/epan/packet.c:2329:7 #25 0x7f0d43e2563b in dissect_ieee802154_common wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.c:1139:17 #26 0x7f0d43e1b40a in dissect_ieee802154_nofcs wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.c:594:5 #27 0x7f0d42d6dcc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #28 0x7f0d42d605ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #29 0x7f0d42d5fdbd in dissector_try_uint_new wireshark/epan/packet.c:1148:9 #30 0x7f0d43a6f5f6 in dissect_frame wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-frame.c:500:11 #31 0x7f0d42d6dcc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #32 0x7f0d42d605ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #33 0x7f0d42d6a2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #34 0x7f0d42d5bccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #35 0x7f0d42d5b33b in dissect_record wireshark/epan/packet.c:501:3 #36 0x7f0d42d093c9 in epan_dissect_run_with_taps wireshark/epan/epan.c:373:2 #37 0x5264eb in process_packet wireshark/tshark.c:3728:5 #38 0x51f960 in load_cap_file wireshark/tshark.c:3484:11 #39 0x515daf in main wireshark/tshark.c:2197:13 0x7f0d4f321100 is located 32 bytes to the left of global variable 'ett_zbee_zcl_appl_ctrl_func' defined in 'packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:4460:13' (0x7f0d4f321120) of size 128 0x7f0d4f321100 is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable 'ett_zbee_zcl_pwr_prof_enphases' defined in 'packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3329:13' (0x7f0d4f3210c0) of size 64 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c:3685:25 in dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_enphsschednotif Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0fe229e5c1d0: 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe229e5c1e0: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0fe229e5c1f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe229e5c200: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0fe229e5c210: 00 00 04 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =>0x0fe229e5c220:[f9]f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe229e5c230: 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0fe229e5c240: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe229e5c250: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe229e5c260: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe229e5c270: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Heap right redzone: fb Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack partial redzone: f4 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==8228==ABORTING --- cut --- Furthermore, there is yet another similar condition in a somewhat related area of code, see the attached file and report below: --- cut --- ==8856==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f148fad2900 at pc 0x7f1485afc15d bp 0x7ffd41dc3de0 sp 0x7ffd41dc3dd8 READ of size 4 at 0x7f148fad2900 thread T0 #0 0x7f1485afc15c in dissect_zcl_appl_evtalt_get_alerts_rsp wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-ha.c:889:21 #1 0x7f1485afab0f in dissect_zbee_zcl_appl_evtalt wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-ha.c:818:21 #2 0x7f148351ecc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #3 0x7f14835115ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #4 0x7f148351b2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #5 0x7f148350cccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #6 0x7f1485ae18ac in dissect_zbee_zcl wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl.c:887:13 #7 0x7f148351ecc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #8 0x7f14835115ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #9 0x7f148351b2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #10 0x7f148350cccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #11 0x7f1485abbe40 in dissect_zbee_aps wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-aps.c:1029:21 #12 0x7f148351ecc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #13 0x7f14835115ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #14 0x7f148351b2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #15 0x7f148350cccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #16 0x7f1485ac5897 in dissect_zbee_nwk_full wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:665:9 #17 0x7f1485abf8aa in dissect_zbee_nwk wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:701:9 #18 0x7f1485ac0ef7 in dissect_zbee_nwk_heur wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-nwk.c:337:5 #19 0x7f1483519417 in dissector_try_heuristic wireshark/epan/packet.c:2329:7 #20 0x7f14845d663b in dissect_ieee802154_common wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.c:1139:17 #21 0x7f14845cc35e in dissect_ieee802154 wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.c:561:5 #22 0x7f148351ecc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #23 0x7f14835115ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #24 0x7f1483510dbd in dissector_try_uint_new wireshark/epan/packet.c:1148:9 #25 0x7f14842205f6 in dissect_frame wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-frame.c:500:11 #26 0x7f148351ecc1 in call_dissector_through_handle wireshark/epan/packet.c:616:8 #27 0x7f14835115ea in call_dissector_work wireshark/epan/packet.c:691:9 #28 0x7f148351b2be in call_dissector_only wireshark/epan/packet.c:2662:8 #29 0x7f148350cccf in call_dissector_with_data wireshark/epan/packet.c:2675:8 #30 0x7f148350c33b in dissect_record wireshark/epan/packet.c:501:3 #31 0x7f14834ba3c9 in epan_dissect_run_with_taps wireshark/epan/epan.c:373:2 #32 0x5264eb in process_packet wireshark/tshark.c:3728:5 #33 0x51f960 in load_cap_file wireshark/tshark.c:3484:11 #34 0x515daf in main wireshark/tshark.c:2197:13 0x7f148fad2900 is located 32 bytes to the left of global variable 'ett' defined in 'packet-zbee-zcl-ha.c:1391:18' (0x7f148fad2920) of size 136 0x7f148fad2900 is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable 'ett_zbee_zcl_appl_evtalt_alerts_struct' defined in 'packet-zbee-zcl-ha.c:698:13' (0x7f148fad28e0) of size 32 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-ha.c:889:21 in dissect_zcl_appl_evtalt_get_alerts_rsp Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0fe311f524d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f524e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f524f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52510: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =>0x0fe311f52520:[f9]f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52530: 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52540: 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52550: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52560: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0fe311f52570: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Heap right redzone: fb Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack partial redzone: f4 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==8856==ABORTING --- cut --- Proof of Concept: https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/38995.zip

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.0

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.1

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.2

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.3

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.4

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.5

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.6

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.7

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 1.12.8

Wireshark>>Wireshark >> Version 2.0.0

References

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/79382
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3505
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-05
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034551
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK