CVE-2016-7182 : Detail

CVE-2016-7182

9.8
/
Critical
A03-Injection
29.86%V4
Network
2016-10-13
23h00 +00:00
2018-10-12
17h57 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

The Graphics component in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; Office 2007 SP3; Office 2010 SP2; Word Viewer; Skype for Business 2016; Lync 2013 SP1; Lync 2010; Lync 2010 Attendee; and Live Meeting 2007 Console allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted True Type font, aka "True Type Font Parsing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.0 9.8 CRITICAL CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

 nvd@nist.gov
V2 10 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 40599

Publication date : 2016-10-19 22h00 +00:00
Author : Google Security Research
EDB Verified : Yes

Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=868 We have encountered Windows kernel crashes in the win32k!sbit_Embolden and win32k!ttfdCloseFontContext functions while processing corrupted TTF font files. Excerpts of them are shown below: --- KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (8e) This is a very common bugcheck. Usually the exception address pinpoints the driver/function that caused the problem. Always note this address as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address. Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003. This means a hard coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted /NODEBUG. This is not supposed to happen as developers should never have hardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ... If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and the system is booted /DEBUG. This will let us see why this breakpoint is happening. Arguments: Arg1: c0000005, The exception code that was not handled Arg2: 8e70bba3, The address that the exception occurred at Arg3: 9b7e3a84, Trap Frame Arg4: 00000000 Debugging Details: ------------------ EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s. FAULTING_IP: win32k!MultiUserGreTrackRemoveEngResource+1c 8e70bba3 8901 mov dword ptr [ecx],eax TRAP_FRAME: 9b7e3a84 -- (.trap 0xffffffff9b7e3a84) ErrCode = 00000002 eax=fa42ce68 ebx=fa42ce78 ecx=00000000 edx=00000000 esi=ff73a000 edi=fc4a4fc8 eip=8e70bba3 esp=9b7e3af8 ebp=9b7e3af8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na pe nc cs=0008 ss=0010 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00010246 win32k!MultiUserGreTrackRemoveEngResource+0x1c: 8e70bba3 8901 mov dword ptr [ecx],eax ds:0023:00000000=???????? Resetting default scope DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT BUGCHECK_STR: 0x8E PROCESS_NAME: csrss.exe CURRENT_IRQL: 2 ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) x86fre LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 82933d87 to 828cf978 STACK_TEXT: 9b7e303c 82933d87 00000003 1d46c818 00000065 nt!RtlpBreakWithStatusInstruction 9b7e308c 82934885 00000003 9b7e3490 00000000 nt!KiBugCheckDebugBreak+0x1c 9b7e3450 82933c24 0000008e c0000005 8e70bba3 nt!KeBugCheck2+0x68b 9b7e3474 829092a7 0000008e c0000005 8e70bba3 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x1e 9b7e3a14 828929a6 9b7e3a30 00000000 9b7e3a84 nt!KiDispatchException+0x1ac 9b7e3a7c 8289295a 9b7e3af8 8e70bba3 badb0d00 nt!CommonDispatchException+0x4a 9b7e3af8 8e70bbe6 ff73a000 fb77cd28 9b7e3b20 nt!Kei386EoiHelper+0x192 9b7e3b08 8e7ef63d ff73a010 8e7ef5c0 fb784cf0 win32k!EngFreeMem+0x16 9b7e3b20 8e7ef67c fa42ce78 9b7e3b98 9b7e3b3c win32k!ttfdCloseFontContext+0x51 9b7e3b30 8e7ef5d8 fb784cf0 9b7e3b74 8e7ef1f8 win32k!ttfdDestroyFont+0x16 9b7e3b3c 8e7ef1f8 fb784cf0 fe38ccf0 9b7e3bd8 win32k!ttfdSemDestroyFont+0x18 9b7e3b74 8e7ef41b fb784cf0 fe38ccf0 00000000 win32k!PDEVOBJ::DestroyFont+0x67 9b7e3ba4 8e7749c3 00000000 00000000 00000001 win32k!RFONTOBJ::vDeleteRFONT+0x33 9b7e3bcc 8e77660f 9b7e3bf0 fb784cf0 00000000 win32k!vRestartKillRFONTList+0x8d 9b7e3c00 8e84100e 00000006 fb284fc0 8eaf8fc8 win32k!PFTOBJ::bUnloadWorkhorse+0x15f 9b7e3c28 82891dc6 0500019c 002cf9cc 76e26bf4 win32k!GreRemoveFontMemResourceEx+0x60 9b7e3c28 76e26bf4 0500019c 002cf9cc 76e26bf4 nt!KiSystemServicePostCall 002cf9cc 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet --- And: --- PAGE_FAULT_IN_FREED_SPECIAL_POOL (cc) Memory was referenced after it was freed. This cannot be protected by try-except. When possible, the guilty driver's name (Unicode string) is printed on the bugcheck screen and saved in KiBugCheckDriver. Arguments: Arg1: fc1ffa54, memory referenced Arg2: 00000001, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation Arg3: 82848a05, if non-zero, the address which referenced memory. Arg4: 00000000, Mm internal code. Debugging Details: ------------------ WRITE_ADDRESS: fc1ffa54 Special pool FAULTING_IP: nt!memset+45 82848a05 f3ab rep stos dword ptr es:[edi] MM_INTERNAL_CODE: 0 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT BUGCHECK_STR: 0xCC PROCESS_NAME: csrss.exe CURRENT_IRQL: 2 ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) x86fre TRAP_FRAME: 8fb73d58 -- (.trap 0xffffffff8fb73d58) ErrCode = 00000002 eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=00000001 edx=00000000 esi=00000004 edi=fc1ffa54 eip=82848a05 esp=8fb73dcc ebp=8fb73e28 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc cs=0008 ss=0010 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00010202 nt!memset+0x45: 82848a05 f3ab rep stos dword ptr es:[edi] Resetting default scope LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 828eed87 to 8288a978 STACK_TEXT: 8fb738ac 828eed87 00000003 766f335a 00000065 nt!RtlpBreakWithStatusInstruction 8fb738fc 828ef885 00000003 00000000 0000000a nt!KiBugCheckDebugBreak+0x1c 8fb73cc0 8289d94d 00000050 fc1ffa54 00000001 nt!KeBugCheck2+0x68b 8fb73d40 8284ffa8 00000001 fc1ffa54 00000000 nt!MmAccessFault+0x104 8fb73d40 82848a05 00000001 fc1ffa54 00000000 nt!KiTrap0E+0xdc 8fb73dcc 8f15cca0 fc1ffa54 00000000 00000004 nt!memset+0x45 8fb73e28 8f050c00 0000000b 00000004 c0000002 win32k!sbit_Embolden+0x34d 8fb73e68 8efc3e10 fb972fd0 fc200ea0 faec6040 win32k!sbit_GetBitmap+0x18c 8fb73eb4 8efc9ff1 fc200010 fc20007c faec6040 win32k!fs_ContourScan+0x192 8fb73ff8 8efbef89 00000028 00000020 faec6000 win32k!lGetGlyphBitmap+0x1aa 8fb74020 8efbedd6 00000000 00000001 00000020 win32k!ttfdQueryFontData+0x15e 8fb74070 8efbdff2 fbf98010 fa794cf0 00000001 win32k!ttfdSemQueryFontData+0x45 8fb740b8 8f14eef5 fbf98010 fa794cf0 00000001 win32k!PDEVOBJ::QueryFontData+0x3e 8fb740e8 8f14ef48 fc586f20 ffa84130 8fb74114 win32k!RFONTOBJ::bInsertGlyphbitsLookaside+0xa7 8fb740f8 8f050663 0000000a fc586f20 8fb74798 win32k!RFONTOBJ::cGetGlyphDataLookaside+0x1c 8fb74114 8f03b2fc 8fb74798 8fb74148 8fb74144 win32k!STROBJ_bEnum+0x6c 8fb7414c 8f03b4d9 00000001 8fb74358 00000d0d win32k!GetTempTextBufferMetrics+0x61 8fb743d4 8ee34042 fc1cadb8 8fb74798 fa794cf0 win32k!EngTextOut+0x26 WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 8fb74410 8f13cce0 fb16edb8 8fb74798 fa794cf0 VBoxDisp+0x4042 8fb7446c 8f03dbcb fef7cc90 8fb74798 fa794cf0 win32k!WatchdogDrvTextOut+0x51 8fb744b8 8f03de38 8f13cc8f 8fb74724 fb16edb8 win32k!OffTextOut+0x71 8fb7473c 8f03d9a8 fb16edb8 8fb74798 fa794cf0 win32k!SpTextOut+0x1a2 8fb74a38 8efcc2d4 8fb74bfc fc0b8e20 fc0b8e7c win32k!GreExtTextOutWLocked+0x1040 8fb74ab4 8f01f251 00000000 ff7bf064 00001000 win32k!GreBatchTextOut+0x1e6 8fb74c24 8284cd5c 000000bc 001afd88 001afdb4 win32k!NtGdiFlushUserBatch+0x123 8fb74c34 76f16bf3 badb0d00 001afd88 00000000 nt!KiSystemServiceAccessTeb+0x10 8fb74c38 badb0d00 001afd88 00000000 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCall+0x3 8fb74c3c 001afd88 00000000 00000000 00000000 0xbadb0d00 8fb74c40 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x1afd88 --- While the two above crashes look differently, we believe they manifest a single security issue, as they occur interchangeably with our proof of concept files. The first one is a NULL pointer dereference while performing a list unlinking operation, while the second is an attempt to write to memory which has already been freed, and they both indicate a use-after-free condition. While we have not determined the specific root cause of the vulnerability, we have pinpointed the offending mutations to reside in the "OS/2" and "VDMX" tables. The issue reproduces on Windows 7 and 8.1. It is easiest to reproduce with Special Pools enabled for win32k.sys (leading to an immediate crash when the bug is triggered), but it is also possible to observe a crash on a default Windows installation. In order to reproduce the problem with the provided samples, it might be necessary to use a custom program which displays all of the font's glyphs at various point sizes. It is also required for the "Adjust for best performance" option to be set in "System > Advanced system settings > Advanced > Performance > Settings", most likely due to the "Smooth edges of screen fonts" getting unchecked. Attached is an archive with three proof of concept font files. Proof of Concept: https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/40599.zip

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Microsoft>>Live_meeting >> Version 2007

Microsoft>>Lync >> Version 2010

Microsoft>>Lync >> Version 2010

Microsoft>>Lync >> Version 2013

Microsoft>>Office >> Version 2007

Microsoft>>Office >> Version 2010

Microsoft>>Skype_for_business >> Version 2016

Microsoft>>Word_viewer >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_10 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_10 >> Version 1511

Microsoft>>Windows_10 >> Version 1607

Microsoft>>Windows_7 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_8.1 >> Version *

Microsoft>>Windows_rt_8.1 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2008 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version -

Microsoft>>Windows_server_2012 >> Version r2

Microsoft>>Windows_vista >> Version -

References

http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036988
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93395
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
The information presented on CVE Find originates from several carefully selected reference sources. CVE data is provided by MITRE Corporation and the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog is sourced from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), while EPSS scores come from FIRST.org. Additionally, data regarding software weaknesses (CWE) and common attack patterns (CAPEC) is maintained by MITRE Corporation, and information on hardware and software configurations (CPE) is provided by the NVD.