CVE-2017-3563 : Detail

CVE-2017-3563

8.8
/
High
Authorization problems
A07-Identif. and Authent. Fail
0.11%V3
Local
2017-04-24
17h00 +00:00
2024-10-04
19h21 +00:00
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox component of Oracle Virtualization (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 5.0.38 and Prior to 5.1.20. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.0 8.8 HIGH CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

A vulnerability exploitable with Local access means that the vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack, and the attacker's path is via read/write/execute capabilities. In some cases, the attacker may be logged in locally in order to exploit the vulnerability, otherwise, she may rely on User Interaction to execute a malicious file.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker is authorized with (i.e. requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Changed

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the authorization privileges intended by the vulnerable component. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

[email protected]
V2 4.6 AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 41908

Publication date : 2017-04-19 22h00 +00:00
Author : Google Security Research
EDB Verified : Yes

Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1103 VirtualBox: Windows Process COM Injection EoP Platform: VirtualBox v5.0.32 r112930 x64 (Tested on Windows 10) Class: Elevation of Privilege Summary: The process hardening implemented by the VirtualBox driver can be circumvented to load arbitrary code inside a VirtualBox process giving access to the VBoxDrv driver which can allow routes to EoP from a normal user. Description: NOTE: I don’t know if you consider this an issue or not, considering the power of accessing the VBoxDrv driver and the efforts you’re going to to block access I’d assume it is. VirtualBox uses a number of different techniques to prevent untrusted code accessing the core system drivers. This is because most of VB runs as a non-admin user but the driver provides a number of privileged features such as allocating kernel memory and loading drivers. This process hardening is implemented in both the kernel driver (which prevents things like getting fully privileged handles to a VB process) and in user mode by hooking the library loader to block untrusted DLLs. Obviously if you could run untrusted code inside the main VirtualBox.exe process it would potentially lead to kernel code execution. Therefore it’d be interesting to bypass. Looking at VirtualBox.exe when it runs it loads a number of COM objects into memory. Due to the way COM works it’s possible to register a per-user version of an object (by it’s unique CLSID) and that’s taken in preference to the system wide version. As all VB processes run under the user’s identity we can replace a class registration (such as for the VirtualBox Client COM server) and the started copy of VirtualBox.exe will try and load our code instead. The trick is bypassing the signature checking process, we can’t just insert our own DLLs, so we must repurpose something which is already trusted, like most of the Microsoft signed binaries in Windows. The simplest attack vector is to use the Scriptlet Component COM server implemented in scrobj.dll. This allows us to register a COM object which instead of being implemented as a DLL is implemented in a scripting language such as JScript or VBScript. As scrobj.dll is verified as a signed MS binary it will load, however we get code execution inside the process through a JScript file which isn’t verified on a default Windows system. Of course JScript isn’t enough to call methods on the VBoxDrv driver so we need a way of breaking out of the restrictive script environment. You could perhaps find a buggy COM object and use that to ROP your way out, but there’s an easier way. The core parts of .NET (such as mscoree, mscorwks, mscorlib) are trusted binaries, so using some of the .NET COM registrations we can use .NET from JScript to bootstrap full .NET where we can do anything, such as calling arbitrary methods through P/Invoke. We can’t just register a .NET COM object though as .NET loads most DLLs via standard library loading which will be blocked by the signature checking, so instead we force .NET to load an assembly from a byte array which the process hardening code never sees. From a fixing perspective I’m sure there’s always going to be edge cases but you’d probably want to blacklist certain DLLs such as scrobj/jscript/vbscript etc. and also anything .NET related. Proof of Concept: I’ve provided a PoC as a scriptlet file and a registry reg script. When combined together the scriptlet replaces the VirtualBox Client COM server (CLSID: {DD3FC71D-26C0-4FE1-BF6F-67F633265BBA}) so when VirtualBox.exe tries to load it instead it gets a JScript implementation which bypasses the signature checking (as scrobj.dll/jscript.dll etc are MS signed system binaries). It then gets full execution by bootstrapping some arbitrary .NET code from memory (so there’s no DLL to verify) so that it can call exported library functions and access the VirtualBox driver. Prerequisites: You’ll need .NET 3.5 installed for the PoC to work. This isn’t strictly necessary you could register the appropriate COM classes for .NET 4 but no point polluting the registry even more. You need a configured VM to start. 1) Ensure that .NET 3.5 is installed. Otherwise the PoC will prompt you to install. 2) Copy poc.sct to the directory c:\poc so you have a file c:\poc\poc.sct on the local disk. 3) Start a VM using VBoxManage startvm "VM Name" (don’t use the GUI as that’ll also load our COM object which won’t work very well). 4) A message box should appear showing two memory addresses (which are the result of calling SUPR3PageAllocEx). The message box should be being displayed from the “unrestricted” VirtualBox.exe process. Expected Result: Loading Scriptlet code into memory should fail Observed Result: Scriptlet code is loaded and access to the device driver is allowed. Proof of Concept: https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/41908.zip

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Vm_virtualbox >> Version From (including) 5.0.0 To (excluding) 5.0.38

Oracle>>Vm_virtualbox >> Version From (including) 5.1.0 To (excluding) 5.1.20

References

http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038288
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41908/
Tags : exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97732
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID